Cargando…

Accuracy of two methods to detect the presence of halitosis: the volatile sulfur compounds concentration in the mouth air and the information from a close person

This study aimed to analyze the accuracy of two methods for detecting halitosis, the organoleptic assessment by a trained professional (OA) with volatile sulfur compounds (VSC) measurement via Halimeter(®) (Interscan Corporation) and information obtained from a close person (ICP). METHODOLODY: Parti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: RODRIGUES, Nádia Cristina Pinheiro, ABRÃO, Alexandre, NADANOVSKY, Paulo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10159043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37132667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2022-0412
_version_ 1785037047274143744
author RODRIGUES, Nádia Cristina Pinheiro
ABRÃO, Alexandre
NADANOVSKY, Paulo
author_facet RODRIGUES, Nádia Cristina Pinheiro
ABRÃO, Alexandre
NADANOVSKY, Paulo
author_sort RODRIGUES, Nádia Cristina Pinheiro
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to analyze the accuracy of two methods for detecting halitosis, the organoleptic assessment by a trained professional (OA) with volatile sulfur compounds (VSC) measurement via Halimeter(®) (Interscan Corporation) and information obtained from a close person (ICP). METHODOLODY: Participants were patients and companions who visited a university hospital over one year period to perform digestive endoscopy. A total of 138 participants were included in the VSC test, whose 115 were also included in the ICP test. ROC curves were constructed to establish the best VSC cut-off points. RESULTS: The prevalence of halitosis was 12% (95%CI: 7% to 18%) and 9% (95%CI 3% to 14%) for the OA and ICP, respectively. At the cut-off point >80 parts per billion (ppb) VSC, the prevalence of halitosis was 18% (95%CI: 12% to 25%). At the cut-off point >65 ppb VSC, sensitivity and specificity were 94% and 76%, respectively. At the cut-off point >140 ppb, sensitivity was 47% and specificity 96%. For the ICP, sensitivity was 14% and specificity 92%. CONCLUSIONS: VSC presents high sensitivity at the cut-off point of >65 ppb and high specificity at the cut-off point of >140 ppb. ICP had high specificity, but low sensitivity. The OA can express either occasional or chronic bad breath, whereas the ICP can be a potential instrument to detect chronic halitosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10159043
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101590432023-05-05 Accuracy of two methods to detect the presence of halitosis: the volatile sulfur compounds concentration in the mouth air and the information from a close person RODRIGUES, Nádia Cristina Pinheiro ABRÃO, Alexandre NADANOVSKY, Paulo J Appl Oral Sci Original Article This study aimed to analyze the accuracy of two methods for detecting halitosis, the organoleptic assessment by a trained professional (OA) with volatile sulfur compounds (VSC) measurement via Halimeter(®) (Interscan Corporation) and information obtained from a close person (ICP). METHODOLODY: Participants were patients and companions who visited a university hospital over one year period to perform digestive endoscopy. A total of 138 participants were included in the VSC test, whose 115 were also included in the ICP test. ROC curves were constructed to establish the best VSC cut-off points. RESULTS: The prevalence of halitosis was 12% (95%CI: 7% to 18%) and 9% (95%CI 3% to 14%) for the OA and ICP, respectively. At the cut-off point >80 parts per billion (ppb) VSC, the prevalence of halitosis was 18% (95%CI: 12% to 25%). At the cut-off point >65 ppb VSC, sensitivity and specificity were 94% and 76%, respectively. At the cut-off point >140 ppb, sensitivity was 47% and specificity 96%. For the ICP, sensitivity was 14% and specificity 92%. CONCLUSIONS: VSC presents high sensitivity at the cut-off point of >65 ppb and high specificity at the cut-off point of >140 ppb. ICP had high specificity, but low sensitivity. The OA can express either occasional or chronic bad breath, whereas the ICP can be a potential instrument to detect chronic halitosis. Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP 2023-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10159043/ /pubmed/37132667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2022-0412 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
RODRIGUES, Nádia Cristina Pinheiro
ABRÃO, Alexandre
NADANOVSKY, Paulo
Accuracy of two methods to detect the presence of halitosis: the volatile sulfur compounds concentration in the mouth air and the information from a close person
title Accuracy of two methods to detect the presence of halitosis: the volatile sulfur compounds concentration in the mouth air and the information from a close person
title_full Accuracy of two methods to detect the presence of halitosis: the volatile sulfur compounds concentration in the mouth air and the information from a close person
title_fullStr Accuracy of two methods to detect the presence of halitosis: the volatile sulfur compounds concentration in the mouth air and the information from a close person
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of two methods to detect the presence of halitosis: the volatile sulfur compounds concentration in the mouth air and the information from a close person
title_short Accuracy of two methods to detect the presence of halitosis: the volatile sulfur compounds concentration in the mouth air and the information from a close person
title_sort accuracy of two methods to detect the presence of halitosis: the volatile sulfur compounds concentration in the mouth air and the information from a close person
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10159043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37132667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2022-0412
work_keys_str_mv AT rodriguesnadiacristinapinheiro accuracyoftwomethodstodetectthepresenceofhalitosisthevolatilesulfurcompoundsconcentrationinthemouthairandtheinformationfromacloseperson
AT abraoalexandre accuracyoftwomethodstodetectthepresenceofhalitosisthevolatilesulfurcompoundsconcentrationinthemouthairandtheinformationfromacloseperson
AT nadanovskypaulo accuracyoftwomethodstodetectthepresenceofhalitosisthevolatilesulfurcompoundsconcentrationinthemouthairandtheinformationfromacloseperson