Cargando…
Management of hangman’s fractures using anchored anterior cervical cages
BACKGROUND: Hangman’s fractures comprise approximately 20% of C2 fractures and often require surgery to correct significant angulation and/or subluxation. Recently, anchored anterior cervical cages (ACCs) have been used to fuse C2-3 as they reduce the risks of soft-tissue dissection, bone drilling,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Scientific Scholar
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10159285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37151433 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_796_2022 |
_version_ | 1785037104587210752 |
---|---|
author | Cho, Steve S. Farber, S. Harrison Kiernan, Hayley Teng, Clare W. Wanebo, Oliver R. Ponce, Francisco A. Tumialán, Luis M. Wanebo, John E. |
author_facet | Cho, Steve S. Farber, S. Harrison Kiernan, Hayley Teng, Clare W. Wanebo, Oliver R. Ponce, Francisco A. Tumialán, Luis M. Wanebo, John E. |
author_sort | Cho, Steve S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hangman’s fractures comprise approximately 20% of C2 fractures and often require surgery to correct significant angulation and/or subluxation. Recently, anchored anterior cervical cages (ACCs) have been used to fuse C2-3 as they reduce the risks of soft-tissue dissection, bone drilling, operative time, and postoperative dysphagia. METHODS: This single-center and retrospective study (2012–2019) included 12 patients (3 type I, 6 type II, and 3 type IIa fractures) undergoing C2-3 ACCs (zero profile, half plate, full plate). Preoperative and postoperative radiographic and clinical data were analyzed. RESULTS: The 12 patients demonstrated the following findings: a mean operative time of 106 ± 21 min, blood loss averaging 67 ± 58 mL, and mean length of stay of 9.8 ± 7.7 days (6.4 ± 5.5 days in intensive care). The mean differences in preoperative versus postoperative radiographs showed an increase in disc angle (9.0° ± 9.4° vs. 14.0° ± 7.2°), reduction of subluxation (18.5% ± 13.6% vs. 2.6% ± 6.2%), and maintenance of C2-7 lordosis (14.3° ± 9.5° vs. 14.4° ± 9.5°). All patients demonstrated fusion on dynamic films obtained >6 months postoperatively. In addition, only one patient had Grade 0 subsidence, three had transient postoperative dysphagia, whereas none had either intraoperative complications or 90-day readmissions. CONCLUSION: ACCs proved to be a viable alternative to traditional anterior cervical discectomy/fusion to treat 12 patients with C2-3 hangman’s fractures in this preliminary study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10159285 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Scientific Scholar |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101592852023-05-05 Management of hangman’s fractures using anchored anterior cervical cages Cho, Steve S. Farber, S. Harrison Kiernan, Hayley Teng, Clare W. Wanebo, Oliver R. Ponce, Francisco A. Tumialán, Luis M. Wanebo, John E. Surg Neurol Int Original Article BACKGROUND: Hangman’s fractures comprise approximately 20% of C2 fractures and often require surgery to correct significant angulation and/or subluxation. Recently, anchored anterior cervical cages (ACCs) have been used to fuse C2-3 as they reduce the risks of soft-tissue dissection, bone drilling, operative time, and postoperative dysphagia. METHODS: This single-center and retrospective study (2012–2019) included 12 patients (3 type I, 6 type II, and 3 type IIa fractures) undergoing C2-3 ACCs (zero profile, half plate, full plate). Preoperative and postoperative radiographic and clinical data were analyzed. RESULTS: The 12 patients demonstrated the following findings: a mean operative time of 106 ± 21 min, blood loss averaging 67 ± 58 mL, and mean length of stay of 9.8 ± 7.7 days (6.4 ± 5.5 days in intensive care). The mean differences in preoperative versus postoperative radiographs showed an increase in disc angle (9.0° ± 9.4° vs. 14.0° ± 7.2°), reduction of subluxation (18.5% ± 13.6% vs. 2.6% ± 6.2%), and maintenance of C2-7 lordosis (14.3° ± 9.5° vs. 14.4° ± 9.5°). All patients demonstrated fusion on dynamic films obtained >6 months postoperatively. In addition, only one patient had Grade 0 subsidence, three had transient postoperative dysphagia, whereas none had either intraoperative complications or 90-day readmissions. CONCLUSION: ACCs proved to be a viable alternative to traditional anterior cervical discectomy/fusion to treat 12 patients with C2-3 hangman’s fractures in this preliminary study. Scientific Scholar 2023-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10159285/ /pubmed/37151433 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_796_2022 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Surgical Neurology International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Cho, Steve S. Farber, S. Harrison Kiernan, Hayley Teng, Clare W. Wanebo, Oliver R. Ponce, Francisco A. Tumialán, Luis M. Wanebo, John E. Management of hangman’s fractures using anchored anterior cervical cages |
title | Management of hangman’s fractures using anchored anterior cervical cages |
title_full | Management of hangman’s fractures using anchored anterior cervical cages |
title_fullStr | Management of hangman’s fractures using anchored anterior cervical cages |
title_full_unstemmed | Management of hangman’s fractures using anchored anterior cervical cages |
title_short | Management of hangman’s fractures using anchored anterior cervical cages |
title_sort | management of hangman’s fractures using anchored anterior cervical cages |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10159285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37151433 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_796_2022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chosteves managementofhangmansfracturesusinganchoredanteriorcervicalcages AT farbersharrison managementofhangmansfracturesusinganchoredanteriorcervicalcages AT kiernanhayley managementofhangmansfracturesusinganchoredanteriorcervicalcages AT tengclarew managementofhangmansfracturesusinganchoredanteriorcervicalcages AT wanebooliverr managementofhangmansfracturesusinganchoredanteriorcervicalcages AT poncefranciscoa managementofhangmansfracturesusinganchoredanteriorcervicalcages AT tumialanluism managementofhangmansfracturesusinganchoredanteriorcervicalcages AT wanebojohne managementofhangmansfracturesusinganchoredanteriorcervicalcages |