Cargando…

Management of hangman’s fractures using anchored anterior cervical cages

BACKGROUND: Hangman’s fractures comprise approximately 20% of C2 fractures and often require surgery to correct significant angulation and/or subluxation. Recently, anchored anterior cervical cages (ACCs) have been used to fuse C2-3 as they reduce the risks of soft-tissue dissection, bone drilling,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Steve S., Farber, S. Harrison, Kiernan, Hayley, Teng, Clare W., Wanebo, Oliver R., Ponce, Francisco A., Tumialán, Luis M., Wanebo, John E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10159285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37151433
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_796_2022
_version_ 1785037104587210752
author Cho, Steve S.
Farber, S. Harrison
Kiernan, Hayley
Teng, Clare W.
Wanebo, Oliver R.
Ponce, Francisco A.
Tumialán, Luis M.
Wanebo, John E.
author_facet Cho, Steve S.
Farber, S. Harrison
Kiernan, Hayley
Teng, Clare W.
Wanebo, Oliver R.
Ponce, Francisco A.
Tumialán, Luis M.
Wanebo, John E.
author_sort Cho, Steve S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hangman’s fractures comprise approximately 20% of C2 fractures and often require surgery to correct significant angulation and/or subluxation. Recently, anchored anterior cervical cages (ACCs) have been used to fuse C2-3 as they reduce the risks of soft-tissue dissection, bone drilling, operative time, and postoperative dysphagia. METHODS: This single-center and retrospective study (2012–2019) included 12 patients (3 type I, 6 type II, and 3 type IIa fractures) undergoing C2-3 ACCs (zero profile, half plate, full plate). Preoperative and postoperative radiographic and clinical data were analyzed. RESULTS: The 12 patients demonstrated the following findings: a mean operative time of 106 ± 21 min, blood loss averaging 67 ± 58 mL, and mean length of stay of 9.8 ± 7.7 days (6.4 ± 5.5 days in intensive care). The mean differences in preoperative versus postoperative radiographs showed an increase in disc angle (9.0° ± 9.4° vs. 14.0° ± 7.2°), reduction of subluxation (18.5% ± 13.6% vs. 2.6% ± 6.2%), and maintenance of C2-7 lordosis (14.3° ± 9.5° vs. 14.4° ± 9.5°). All patients demonstrated fusion on dynamic films obtained >6 months postoperatively. In addition, only one patient had Grade 0 subsidence, three had transient postoperative dysphagia, whereas none had either intraoperative complications or 90-day readmissions. CONCLUSION: ACCs proved to be a viable alternative to traditional anterior cervical discectomy/fusion to treat 12 patients with C2-3 hangman’s fractures in this preliminary study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10159285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Scientific Scholar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101592852023-05-05 Management of hangman’s fractures using anchored anterior cervical cages Cho, Steve S. Farber, S. Harrison Kiernan, Hayley Teng, Clare W. Wanebo, Oliver R. Ponce, Francisco A. Tumialán, Luis M. Wanebo, John E. Surg Neurol Int Original Article BACKGROUND: Hangman’s fractures comprise approximately 20% of C2 fractures and often require surgery to correct significant angulation and/or subluxation. Recently, anchored anterior cervical cages (ACCs) have been used to fuse C2-3 as they reduce the risks of soft-tissue dissection, bone drilling, operative time, and postoperative dysphagia. METHODS: This single-center and retrospective study (2012–2019) included 12 patients (3 type I, 6 type II, and 3 type IIa fractures) undergoing C2-3 ACCs (zero profile, half plate, full plate). Preoperative and postoperative radiographic and clinical data were analyzed. RESULTS: The 12 patients demonstrated the following findings: a mean operative time of 106 ± 21 min, blood loss averaging 67 ± 58 mL, and mean length of stay of 9.8 ± 7.7 days (6.4 ± 5.5 days in intensive care). The mean differences in preoperative versus postoperative radiographs showed an increase in disc angle (9.0° ± 9.4° vs. 14.0° ± 7.2°), reduction of subluxation (18.5% ± 13.6% vs. 2.6% ± 6.2%), and maintenance of C2-7 lordosis (14.3° ± 9.5° vs. 14.4° ± 9.5°). All patients demonstrated fusion on dynamic films obtained >6 months postoperatively. In addition, only one patient had Grade 0 subsidence, three had transient postoperative dysphagia, whereas none had either intraoperative complications or 90-day readmissions. CONCLUSION: ACCs proved to be a viable alternative to traditional anterior cervical discectomy/fusion to treat 12 patients with C2-3 hangman’s fractures in this preliminary study. Scientific Scholar 2023-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10159285/ /pubmed/37151433 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_796_2022 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Surgical Neurology International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Cho, Steve S.
Farber, S. Harrison
Kiernan, Hayley
Teng, Clare W.
Wanebo, Oliver R.
Ponce, Francisco A.
Tumialán, Luis M.
Wanebo, John E.
Management of hangman’s fractures using anchored anterior cervical cages
title Management of hangman’s fractures using anchored anterior cervical cages
title_full Management of hangman’s fractures using anchored anterior cervical cages
title_fullStr Management of hangman’s fractures using anchored anterior cervical cages
title_full_unstemmed Management of hangman’s fractures using anchored anterior cervical cages
title_short Management of hangman’s fractures using anchored anterior cervical cages
title_sort management of hangman’s fractures using anchored anterior cervical cages
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10159285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37151433
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_796_2022
work_keys_str_mv AT chosteves managementofhangmansfracturesusinganchoredanteriorcervicalcages
AT farbersharrison managementofhangmansfracturesusinganchoredanteriorcervicalcages
AT kiernanhayley managementofhangmansfracturesusinganchoredanteriorcervicalcages
AT tengclarew managementofhangmansfracturesusinganchoredanteriorcervicalcages
AT wanebooliverr managementofhangmansfracturesusinganchoredanteriorcervicalcages
AT poncefranciscoa managementofhangmansfracturesusinganchoredanteriorcervicalcages
AT tumialanluism managementofhangmansfracturesusinganchoredanteriorcervicalcages
AT wanebojohne managementofhangmansfracturesusinganchoredanteriorcervicalcages