Cargando…
Intraoperative complications of vertebral body stenting system
BACKGROUND: Vertebral body stenting systems (VBSs) are superior to balloon kyphoplasty for performing vertebral augmentation and height restoration. However, VBS may likely result in more material-related complications that have been under-reported. Here, an 84-year-old female’s vertebral stents “to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Scientific Scholar
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10159301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37151457 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_299_2023 |
_version_ | 1785037108746911744 |
---|---|
author | Kanematsu, Ryo Hanakita, Junya Takahashi, Toshiyuki Minami, Manabu Nakamura, Sho Tokunaga, Shinya Suda, Izumi |
author_facet | Kanematsu, Ryo Hanakita, Junya Takahashi, Toshiyuki Minami, Manabu Nakamura, Sho Tokunaga, Shinya Suda, Izumi |
author_sort | Kanematsu, Ryo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Vertebral body stenting systems (VBSs) are superior to balloon kyphoplasty for performing vertebral augmentation and height restoration. However, VBS may likely result in more material-related complications that have been under-reported. Here, an 84-year-old female’s vertebral stents “toppled over” before the filling cement was fully applied, thus necessitating an additional posterior fusion. CASE DESCRIPTION: An 84-year-old female presented with low back pain after a fall. Dynamic standing and decubitus X-rays revealed a vertebral compression fracture at T12 resulting in an intravertebral vacuum cleft (i.e., the lowermost level of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis). When the VBS was performed, the stents “toppled over” just after removing the balloon catheters; we successfully restored with the cement volume in one stent but not the other, thus warranting an additional posterior fusion to maintain stability. CONCLUSION: The proper injection of cement into a VBS requires dual correct stent positioning, and careful control of requisite stent expansion. In an 84-year-old female with a T12 vertebral body fracture and a remarkable vacuum cleft, the VBS procedure resulted in an inadvertent injection into one stent thus warranting a secondary posterior fusion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10159301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Scientific Scholar |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101593012023-05-05 Intraoperative complications of vertebral body stenting system Kanematsu, Ryo Hanakita, Junya Takahashi, Toshiyuki Minami, Manabu Nakamura, Sho Tokunaga, Shinya Suda, Izumi Surg Neurol Int Case Report BACKGROUND: Vertebral body stenting systems (VBSs) are superior to balloon kyphoplasty for performing vertebral augmentation and height restoration. However, VBS may likely result in more material-related complications that have been under-reported. Here, an 84-year-old female’s vertebral stents “toppled over” before the filling cement was fully applied, thus necessitating an additional posterior fusion. CASE DESCRIPTION: An 84-year-old female presented with low back pain after a fall. Dynamic standing and decubitus X-rays revealed a vertebral compression fracture at T12 resulting in an intravertebral vacuum cleft (i.e., the lowermost level of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis). When the VBS was performed, the stents “toppled over” just after removing the balloon catheters; we successfully restored with the cement volume in one stent but not the other, thus warranting an additional posterior fusion to maintain stability. CONCLUSION: The proper injection of cement into a VBS requires dual correct stent positioning, and careful control of requisite stent expansion. In an 84-year-old female with a T12 vertebral body fracture and a remarkable vacuum cleft, the VBS procedure resulted in an inadvertent injection into one stent thus warranting a secondary posterior fusion. Scientific Scholar 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10159301/ /pubmed/37151457 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_299_2023 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Surgical Neurology International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Kanematsu, Ryo Hanakita, Junya Takahashi, Toshiyuki Minami, Manabu Nakamura, Sho Tokunaga, Shinya Suda, Izumi Intraoperative complications of vertebral body stenting system |
title | Intraoperative complications of vertebral body stenting system |
title_full | Intraoperative complications of vertebral body stenting system |
title_fullStr | Intraoperative complications of vertebral body stenting system |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraoperative complications of vertebral body stenting system |
title_short | Intraoperative complications of vertebral body stenting system |
title_sort | intraoperative complications of vertebral body stenting system |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10159301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37151457 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_299_2023 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kanematsuryo intraoperativecomplicationsofvertebralbodystentingsystem AT hanakitajunya intraoperativecomplicationsofvertebralbodystentingsystem AT takahashitoshiyuki intraoperativecomplicationsofvertebralbodystentingsystem AT minamimanabu intraoperativecomplicationsofvertebralbodystentingsystem AT nakamurasho intraoperativecomplicationsofvertebralbodystentingsystem AT tokunagashinya intraoperativecomplicationsofvertebralbodystentingsystem AT sudaizumi intraoperativecomplicationsofvertebralbodystentingsystem |