Cargando…

Intraoperative complications of vertebral body stenting system

BACKGROUND: Vertebral body stenting systems (VBSs) are superior to balloon kyphoplasty for performing vertebral augmentation and height restoration. However, VBS may likely result in more material-related complications that have been under-reported. Here, an 84-year-old female’s vertebral stents “to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kanematsu, Ryo, Hanakita, Junya, Takahashi, Toshiyuki, Minami, Manabu, Nakamura, Sho, Tokunaga, Shinya, Suda, Izumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10159301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37151457
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_299_2023
_version_ 1785037108746911744
author Kanematsu, Ryo
Hanakita, Junya
Takahashi, Toshiyuki
Minami, Manabu
Nakamura, Sho
Tokunaga, Shinya
Suda, Izumi
author_facet Kanematsu, Ryo
Hanakita, Junya
Takahashi, Toshiyuki
Minami, Manabu
Nakamura, Sho
Tokunaga, Shinya
Suda, Izumi
author_sort Kanematsu, Ryo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vertebral body stenting systems (VBSs) are superior to balloon kyphoplasty for performing vertebral augmentation and height restoration. However, VBS may likely result in more material-related complications that have been under-reported. Here, an 84-year-old female’s vertebral stents “toppled over” before the filling cement was fully applied, thus necessitating an additional posterior fusion. CASE DESCRIPTION: An 84-year-old female presented with low back pain after a fall. Dynamic standing and decubitus X-rays revealed a vertebral compression fracture at T12 resulting in an intravertebral vacuum cleft (i.e., the lowermost level of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis). When the VBS was performed, the stents “toppled over” just after removing the balloon catheters; we successfully restored with the cement volume in one stent but not the other, thus warranting an additional posterior fusion to maintain stability. CONCLUSION: The proper injection of cement into a VBS requires dual correct stent positioning, and careful control of requisite stent expansion. In an 84-year-old female with a T12 vertebral body fracture and a remarkable vacuum cleft, the VBS procedure resulted in an inadvertent injection into one stent thus warranting a secondary posterior fusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10159301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Scientific Scholar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101593012023-05-05 Intraoperative complications of vertebral body stenting system Kanematsu, Ryo Hanakita, Junya Takahashi, Toshiyuki Minami, Manabu Nakamura, Sho Tokunaga, Shinya Suda, Izumi Surg Neurol Int Case Report BACKGROUND: Vertebral body stenting systems (VBSs) are superior to balloon kyphoplasty for performing vertebral augmentation and height restoration. However, VBS may likely result in more material-related complications that have been under-reported. Here, an 84-year-old female’s vertebral stents “toppled over” before the filling cement was fully applied, thus necessitating an additional posterior fusion. CASE DESCRIPTION: An 84-year-old female presented with low back pain after a fall. Dynamic standing and decubitus X-rays revealed a vertebral compression fracture at T12 resulting in an intravertebral vacuum cleft (i.e., the lowermost level of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis). When the VBS was performed, the stents “toppled over” just after removing the balloon catheters; we successfully restored with the cement volume in one stent but not the other, thus warranting an additional posterior fusion to maintain stability. CONCLUSION: The proper injection of cement into a VBS requires dual correct stent positioning, and careful control of requisite stent expansion. In an 84-year-old female with a T12 vertebral body fracture and a remarkable vacuum cleft, the VBS procedure resulted in an inadvertent injection into one stent thus warranting a secondary posterior fusion. Scientific Scholar 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10159301/ /pubmed/37151457 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_299_2023 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Surgical Neurology International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Case Report
Kanematsu, Ryo
Hanakita, Junya
Takahashi, Toshiyuki
Minami, Manabu
Nakamura, Sho
Tokunaga, Shinya
Suda, Izumi
Intraoperative complications of vertebral body stenting system
title Intraoperative complications of vertebral body stenting system
title_full Intraoperative complications of vertebral body stenting system
title_fullStr Intraoperative complications of vertebral body stenting system
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative complications of vertebral body stenting system
title_short Intraoperative complications of vertebral body stenting system
title_sort intraoperative complications of vertebral body stenting system
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10159301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37151457
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_299_2023
work_keys_str_mv AT kanematsuryo intraoperativecomplicationsofvertebralbodystentingsystem
AT hanakitajunya intraoperativecomplicationsofvertebralbodystentingsystem
AT takahashitoshiyuki intraoperativecomplicationsofvertebralbodystentingsystem
AT minamimanabu intraoperativecomplicationsofvertebralbodystentingsystem
AT nakamurasho intraoperativecomplicationsofvertebralbodystentingsystem
AT tokunagashinya intraoperativecomplicationsofvertebralbodystentingsystem
AT sudaizumi intraoperativecomplicationsofvertebralbodystentingsystem