Cargando…

The microbiome of an outpatient rehabilitation clinic and predictors of contamination: A pilot study

BACKGROUND: Understanding sources of microbial contamination in outpatient rehabilitation (REHAB) clinics is important to patients and healthcare providers. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to characterize the microbiome of an outpatient REHAB clinic and examine relationships between clinic fa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brigando, Gabriella, Sutton, Casey, Uebelhor, Olivia, Pitsoulakis, Nicholas, Pytynia, Matthew, Dillon, Thomas, Elliott-Burke, Teresa, Hubert, Nathaniel, Martinez-Guryn, Kristina, Bolch, Charlotte, Ciancio, Mae J., Evans, Christian C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10159339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37141300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281299
_version_ 1785037119984500736
author Brigando, Gabriella
Sutton, Casey
Uebelhor, Olivia
Pitsoulakis, Nicholas
Pytynia, Matthew
Dillon, Thomas
Elliott-Burke, Teresa
Hubert, Nathaniel
Martinez-Guryn, Kristina
Bolch, Charlotte
Ciancio, Mae J.
Evans, Christian C.
author_facet Brigando, Gabriella
Sutton, Casey
Uebelhor, Olivia
Pitsoulakis, Nicholas
Pytynia, Matthew
Dillon, Thomas
Elliott-Burke, Teresa
Hubert, Nathaniel
Martinez-Guryn, Kristina
Bolch, Charlotte
Ciancio, Mae J.
Evans, Christian C.
author_sort Brigando, Gabriella
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Understanding sources of microbial contamination in outpatient rehabilitation (REHAB) clinics is important to patients and healthcare providers. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to characterize the microbiome of an outpatient REHAB clinic and examine relationships between clinic factors and contamination. METHODS: Forty commonly contacted surfaces in an outpatient REHAB clinic were observed for frequency of contact and swiped using environmental sample collection kits. Surfaces were categorized based on frequency of contact and cleaning and surface type. Total bacterial and fungal load was assessed using primer sets specific for the 16S rRNA and ITS genes, respectively. Bacterial samples were sequenced using the Illumina system and analyzed using Illumina-utils, Minimum Entropy Decomposition, QIIME2 (for alpha and beta diversity), LEfSe and ANCOM-BC for taxonomic differential abundance and ADONIS to test for differences in beta diversity (p<0.05). RESULTS: Porous surfaces had more bacterial DNA compared to non-porous surfaces (median non-porous = 0.0016ng/μL, 95%CI = 0.0077–0.00024ng/μL, N = 15; porous = 0.0084 ng/μL, 95%CI = 0.0046–0.019 ng/μL, N = 18. p = 0.0066,DNA. Samples clustered by type of surface with non-porous surfaces further differentiated by those contacted by hand versus foot. ADONIS two-way ANOVA showed that the interaction of porosity and contact frequency (but neither alone) had a significant effect on 16S communities (F = 1.7234, R(2) = 0.0609, p = 0.032). DISCUSSION: Porosity of surfaces and the way they are contacted may play an underestimated, but important role in microbial contamination. Additional research involving a broader range of clinics is required to confirm results. Results suggest that surface and contact-specific cleaning and hygiene measures may be needed for optimal sanitization in outpatient REHAB clinics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10159339
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101593392023-05-05 The microbiome of an outpatient rehabilitation clinic and predictors of contamination: A pilot study Brigando, Gabriella Sutton, Casey Uebelhor, Olivia Pitsoulakis, Nicholas Pytynia, Matthew Dillon, Thomas Elliott-Burke, Teresa Hubert, Nathaniel Martinez-Guryn, Kristina Bolch, Charlotte Ciancio, Mae J. Evans, Christian C. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Understanding sources of microbial contamination in outpatient rehabilitation (REHAB) clinics is important to patients and healthcare providers. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to characterize the microbiome of an outpatient REHAB clinic and examine relationships between clinic factors and contamination. METHODS: Forty commonly contacted surfaces in an outpatient REHAB clinic were observed for frequency of contact and swiped using environmental sample collection kits. Surfaces were categorized based on frequency of contact and cleaning and surface type. Total bacterial and fungal load was assessed using primer sets specific for the 16S rRNA and ITS genes, respectively. Bacterial samples were sequenced using the Illumina system and analyzed using Illumina-utils, Minimum Entropy Decomposition, QIIME2 (for alpha and beta diversity), LEfSe and ANCOM-BC for taxonomic differential abundance and ADONIS to test for differences in beta diversity (p<0.05). RESULTS: Porous surfaces had more bacterial DNA compared to non-porous surfaces (median non-porous = 0.0016ng/μL, 95%CI = 0.0077–0.00024ng/μL, N = 15; porous = 0.0084 ng/μL, 95%CI = 0.0046–0.019 ng/μL, N = 18. p = 0.0066,DNA. Samples clustered by type of surface with non-porous surfaces further differentiated by those contacted by hand versus foot. ADONIS two-way ANOVA showed that the interaction of porosity and contact frequency (but neither alone) had a significant effect on 16S communities (F = 1.7234, R(2) = 0.0609, p = 0.032). DISCUSSION: Porosity of surfaces and the way they are contacted may play an underestimated, but important role in microbial contamination. Additional research involving a broader range of clinics is required to confirm results. Results suggest that surface and contact-specific cleaning and hygiene measures may be needed for optimal sanitization in outpatient REHAB clinics. Public Library of Science 2023-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10159339/ /pubmed/37141300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281299 Text en © 2023 Brigando et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brigando, Gabriella
Sutton, Casey
Uebelhor, Olivia
Pitsoulakis, Nicholas
Pytynia, Matthew
Dillon, Thomas
Elliott-Burke, Teresa
Hubert, Nathaniel
Martinez-Guryn, Kristina
Bolch, Charlotte
Ciancio, Mae J.
Evans, Christian C.
The microbiome of an outpatient rehabilitation clinic and predictors of contamination: A pilot study
title The microbiome of an outpatient rehabilitation clinic and predictors of contamination: A pilot study
title_full The microbiome of an outpatient rehabilitation clinic and predictors of contamination: A pilot study
title_fullStr The microbiome of an outpatient rehabilitation clinic and predictors of contamination: A pilot study
title_full_unstemmed The microbiome of an outpatient rehabilitation clinic and predictors of contamination: A pilot study
title_short The microbiome of an outpatient rehabilitation clinic and predictors of contamination: A pilot study
title_sort microbiome of an outpatient rehabilitation clinic and predictors of contamination: a pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10159339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37141300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281299
work_keys_str_mv AT brigandogabriella themicrobiomeofanoutpatientrehabilitationclinicandpredictorsofcontaminationapilotstudy
AT suttoncasey themicrobiomeofanoutpatientrehabilitationclinicandpredictorsofcontaminationapilotstudy
AT uebelhorolivia themicrobiomeofanoutpatientrehabilitationclinicandpredictorsofcontaminationapilotstudy
AT pitsoulakisnicholas themicrobiomeofanoutpatientrehabilitationclinicandpredictorsofcontaminationapilotstudy
AT pytyniamatthew themicrobiomeofanoutpatientrehabilitationclinicandpredictorsofcontaminationapilotstudy
AT dillonthomas themicrobiomeofanoutpatientrehabilitationclinicandpredictorsofcontaminationapilotstudy
AT elliottburketeresa themicrobiomeofanoutpatientrehabilitationclinicandpredictorsofcontaminationapilotstudy
AT hubertnathaniel themicrobiomeofanoutpatientrehabilitationclinicandpredictorsofcontaminationapilotstudy
AT martinezgurynkristina themicrobiomeofanoutpatientrehabilitationclinicandpredictorsofcontaminationapilotstudy
AT bolchcharlotte themicrobiomeofanoutpatientrehabilitationclinicandpredictorsofcontaminationapilotstudy
AT cianciomaej themicrobiomeofanoutpatientrehabilitationclinicandpredictorsofcontaminationapilotstudy
AT evanschristianc themicrobiomeofanoutpatientrehabilitationclinicandpredictorsofcontaminationapilotstudy
AT brigandogabriella microbiomeofanoutpatientrehabilitationclinicandpredictorsofcontaminationapilotstudy
AT suttoncasey microbiomeofanoutpatientrehabilitationclinicandpredictorsofcontaminationapilotstudy
AT uebelhorolivia microbiomeofanoutpatientrehabilitationclinicandpredictorsofcontaminationapilotstudy
AT pitsoulakisnicholas microbiomeofanoutpatientrehabilitationclinicandpredictorsofcontaminationapilotstudy
AT pytyniamatthew microbiomeofanoutpatientrehabilitationclinicandpredictorsofcontaminationapilotstudy
AT dillonthomas microbiomeofanoutpatientrehabilitationclinicandpredictorsofcontaminationapilotstudy
AT elliottburketeresa microbiomeofanoutpatientrehabilitationclinicandpredictorsofcontaminationapilotstudy
AT hubertnathaniel microbiomeofanoutpatientrehabilitationclinicandpredictorsofcontaminationapilotstudy
AT martinezgurynkristina microbiomeofanoutpatientrehabilitationclinicandpredictorsofcontaminationapilotstudy
AT bolchcharlotte microbiomeofanoutpatientrehabilitationclinicandpredictorsofcontaminationapilotstudy
AT cianciomaej microbiomeofanoutpatientrehabilitationclinicandpredictorsofcontaminationapilotstudy
AT evanschristianc microbiomeofanoutpatientrehabilitationclinicandpredictorsofcontaminationapilotstudy