Cargando…

Iranian researchers’ perspective about concept and effect of open science on research publication

BACKGROUND: Sharing research outputs with open science methods for different stakeholders causes better access to different studies to solve problems in diverse fields, which leads to equal access conditions to research resources, as well as greater scientific productivity. Therefore, the aim of thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zarghani, Maryam, Nemati-Anaraki, Leila, Sedghi, Shahram, Chakoli, Abdolreza Noroozi, Rowhani-Farid, Anisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10159672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37143102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09420-9
_version_ 1785037151278202880
author Zarghani, Maryam
Nemati-Anaraki, Leila
Sedghi, Shahram
Chakoli, Abdolreza Noroozi
Rowhani-Farid, Anisa
author_facet Zarghani, Maryam
Nemati-Anaraki, Leila
Sedghi, Shahram
Chakoli, Abdolreza Noroozi
Rowhani-Farid, Anisa
author_sort Zarghani, Maryam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sharing research outputs with open science methods for different stakeholders causes better access to different studies to solve problems in diverse fields, which leads to equal access conditions to research resources, as well as greater scientific productivity. Therefore, the aim of this study was to perceive the concept of openness in research among Iranian health researchers. METHODS: From the beginning of August to the middle of November 2021, twenty semi-structured interviews were held with Iranian health researchers from different fields using purposeful, snowball, and convenience sampling. The interviews continued until data saturation. Data analysis was performed with thematic analysis using MAXQDA 20. Finally, seven main issues related to open science were identified. RESULTS: Through analysis of the interviews, 235 primary codes and 173 main codes were extracted in 22 subclasses. After careful evaluation and integration of subclasses and classes, they were finally classified into nine categories and three main themes. Analysis showed that openness in research was related to three main themes: researchers’ understanding of open science, the impact of open science on publication and sharing of research, concerns and reluctance to open research. CONCLUSION: The conditions of access to research output should be specified given the diversity of studies conducted in the field of health; issues like privacy as an important topic of access to data and information in the health system should also be specified. Our analysis indicated that the conditions of publication and sharing of research processes should be stated according to different scopes of health fields. The concept of open science was related to access to findings and other research items regardless of cost, political, social, or racial barriers, which could create collective wisdom in the development of knowledge. The process of publication and sharing of research related to open access applies to all types of outputs, conditions of access, increasing trust in research, creation of diverse publication paths, and broader participation of citizens in research. Open science practices should be promoted to increase the circulation and exploitation rates of knowledge while adjusting and respecting the limits of privacy, intellectual property and national security rights of countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10159672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101596722023-05-06 Iranian researchers’ perspective about concept and effect of open science on research publication Zarghani, Maryam Nemati-Anaraki, Leila Sedghi, Shahram Chakoli, Abdolreza Noroozi Rowhani-Farid, Anisa BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Sharing research outputs with open science methods for different stakeholders causes better access to different studies to solve problems in diverse fields, which leads to equal access conditions to research resources, as well as greater scientific productivity. Therefore, the aim of this study was to perceive the concept of openness in research among Iranian health researchers. METHODS: From the beginning of August to the middle of November 2021, twenty semi-structured interviews were held with Iranian health researchers from different fields using purposeful, snowball, and convenience sampling. The interviews continued until data saturation. Data analysis was performed with thematic analysis using MAXQDA 20. Finally, seven main issues related to open science were identified. RESULTS: Through analysis of the interviews, 235 primary codes and 173 main codes were extracted in 22 subclasses. After careful evaluation and integration of subclasses and classes, they were finally classified into nine categories and three main themes. Analysis showed that openness in research was related to three main themes: researchers’ understanding of open science, the impact of open science on publication and sharing of research, concerns and reluctance to open research. CONCLUSION: The conditions of access to research output should be specified given the diversity of studies conducted in the field of health; issues like privacy as an important topic of access to data and information in the health system should also be specified. Our analysis indicated that the conditions of publication and sharing of research processes should be stated according to different scopes of health fields. The concept of open science was related to access to findings and other research items regardless of cost, political, social, or racial barriers, which could create collective wisdom in the development of knowledge. The process of publication and sharing of research related to open access applies to all types of outputs, conditions of access, increasing trust in research, creation of diverse publication paths, and broader participation of citizens in research. Open science practices should be promoted to increase the circulation and exploitation rates of knowledge while adjusting and respecting the limits of privacy, intellectual property and national security rights of countries. BioMed Central 2023-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10159672/ /pubmed/37143102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09420-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zarghani, Maryam
Nemati-Anaraki, Leila
Sedghi, Shahram
Chakoli, Abdolreza Noroozi
Rowhani-Farid, Anisa
Iranian researchers’ perspective about concept and effect of open science on research publication
title Iranian researchers’ perspective about concept and effect of open science on research publication
title_full Iranian researchers’ perspective about concept and effect of open science on research publication
title_fullStr Iranian researchers’ perspective about concept and effect of open science on research publication
title_full_unstemmed Iranian researchers’ perspective about concept and effect of open science on research publication
title_short Iranian researchers’ perspective about concept and effect of open science on research publication
title_sort iranian researchers’ perspective about concept and effect of open science on research publication
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10159672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37143102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09420-9
work_keys_str_mv AT zarghanimaryam iranianresearchersperspectiveaboutconceptandeffectofopenscienceonresearchpublication
AT nematianarakileila iranianresearchersperspectiveaboutconceptandeffectofopenscienceonresearchpublication
AT sedghishahram iranianresearchersperspectiveaboutconceptandeffectofopenscienceonresearchpublication
AT chakoliabdolrezanoroozi iranianresearchersperspectiveaboutconceptandeffectofopenscienceonresearchpublication
AT rowhanifaridanisa iranianresearchersperspectiveaboutconceptandeffectofopenscienceonresearchpublication