Cargando…
Microtia Reconstruction: Our Strategies to Improve the Outcomes
Introduction : Autologous costal cartilage framework placement is currently the gold standard in patients with microtia. In this article, we present the modifications developed by the author, generally following the principles established by Nagata, and discuss the technical details that have led us...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10159698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37153348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1762907 |
_version_ | 1785037156466556928 |
---|---|
author | Sharma, Mohit G., Srilekha Reddy Kongara, Shruti Jain, Vasundhara K.S, Shravan Rai Harijee, Ankita Badam, Abhinandan Maharaja, Nirav G. Joseph, Thomas R., Janarthanan Iyer, Subramania |
author_facet | Sharma, Mohit G., Srilekha Reddy Kongara, Shruti Jain, Vasundhara K.S, Shravan Rai Harijee, Ankita Badam, Abhinandan Maharaja, Nirav G. Joseph, Thomas R., Janarthanan Iyer, Subramania |
author_sort | Sharma, Mohit |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction : Autologous costal cartilage framework placement is currently the gold standard in patients with microtia. In this article, we present the modifications developed by the author, generally following the principles established by Nagata, and discuss the technical details that have led us to achieve consistently stable and good long-term outcomes for auricular reconstruction in microtia. Materials and Methods : A retrospective review of microtia reconstruction performed from 2015 to 2021 was done. Those who underwent primary reconstruction for microtia and with a minimum follow-up of 6 months with documented photographs were included. Those who underwent secondary reconstruction for microtia and those who did not follow-up for a minimum period of 6 months were excluded. Outcomes were assessed with regard to appearance, and durability of the result. Influence of certain changes like delaying reconstruction until 15 years of age, use of nylon for framework fabrication, etc. over the outcome were assessed. Results : Of 11 ears reconstructed at less than 15 years of age, only one patient (9%) had a good long-term outcome, whereas of the 17 ears reconstructed at greater than 15 years of age, nine patients (53%) had a good long-term outcome. In our experience, infections and wire extrusions were the significant events related to severe cartilage resorption. Conclusion : In our experience, delaying the first stage to 15 years or later, using double-armed nylon sutures, and reducing the projection of the third layer of the framework in select cases have helped to improve our outcomes. Second stage of reconstruction can be avoided if patient is satisfied with the projection achieved in the first stage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10159698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101596982023-05-05 Microtia Reconstruction: Our Strategies to Improve the Outcomes Sharma, Mohit G., Srilekha Reddy Kongara, Shruti Jain, Vasundhara K.S, Shravan Rai Harijee, Ankita Badam, Abhinandan Maharaja, Nirav G. Joseph, Thomas R., Janarthanan Iyer, Subramania Indian J Plast Surg Introduction : Autologous costal cartilage framework placement is currently the gold standard in patients with microtia. In this article, we present the modifications developed by the author, generally following the principles established by Nagata, and discuss the technical details that have led us to achieve consistently stable and good long-term outcomes for auricular reconstruction in microtia. Materials and Methods : A retrospective review of microtia reconstruction performed from 2015 to 2021 was done. Those who underwent primary reconstruction for microtia and with a minimum follow-up of 6 months with documented photographs were included. Those who underwent secondary reconstruction for microtia and those who did not follow-up for a minimum period of 6 months were excluded. Outcomes were assessed with regard to appearance, and durability of the result. Influence of certain changes like delaying reconstruction until 15 years of age, use of nylon for framework fabrication, etc. over the outcome were assessed. Results : Of 11 ears reconstructed at less than 15 years of age, only one patient (9%) had a good long-term outcome, whereas of the 17 ears reconstructed at greater than 15 years of age, nine patients (53%) had a good long-term outcome. In our experience, infections and wire extrusions were the significant events related to severe cartilage resorption. Conclusion : In our experience, delaying the first stage to 15 years or later, using double-armed nylon sutures, and reducing the projection of the third layer of the framework in select cases have helped to improve our outcomes. Second stage of reconstruction can be avoided if patient is satisfied with the projection achieved in the first stage. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10159698/ /pubmed/37153348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1762907 Text en Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Sharma, Mohit G., Srilekha Reddy Kongara, Shruti Jain, Vasundhara K.S, Shravan Rai Harijee, Ankita Badam, Abhinandan Maharaja, Nirav G. Joseph, Thomas R., Janarthanan Iyer, Subramania Microtia Reconstruction: Our Strategies to Improve the Outcomes |
title | Microtia Reconstruction: Our Strategies to Improve the Outcomes |
title_full | Microtia Reconstruction: Our Strategies to Improve the Outcomes |
title_fullStr | Microtia Reconstruction: Our Strategies to Improve the Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Microtia Reconstruction: Our Strategies to Improve the Outcomes |
title_short | Microtia Reconstruction: Our Strategies to Improve the Outcomes |
title_sort | microtia reconstruction: our strategies to improve the outcomes |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10159698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37153348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1762907 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharmamohit microtiareconstructionourstrategiestoimprovetheoutcomes AT gsrilekhareddy microtiareconstructionourstrategiestoimprovetheoutcomes AT kongarashruti microtiareconstructionourstrategiestoimprovetheoutcomes AT jainvasundhara microtiareconstructionourstrategiestoimprovetheoutcomes AT ksshravanrai microtiareconstructionourstrategiestoimprovetheoutcomes AT harijeeankita microtiareconstructionourstrategiestoimprovetheoutcomes AT badamabhinandan microtiareconstructionourstrategiestoimprovetheoutcomes AT maharajaniravg microtiareconstructionourstrategiestoimprovetheoutcomes AT josephthomas microtiareconstructionourstrategiestoimprovetheoutcomes AT rjanarthanan microtiareconstructionourstrategiestoimprovetheoutcomes AT iyersubramania microtiareconstructionourstrategiestoimprovetheoutcomes |