Cargando…
Machine Learning–Based Identification of Target Groups for Thrombectomy in Acute Stroke
Whether endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) improves functional outcome in patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke that do not comply with inclusion criteria of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) but that are considered for EVT in clinical practice is uncertain. We aimed to systematically ide...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10159968/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35670996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12975-022-01040-5 |
_version_ | 1785037191145062400 |
---|---|
author | Quandt, Fanny Flottmann, Fabian Madai, Vince I. Alegiani, Anna Küpper, Clemens Kellert, Lars Hilbert, Adam Frey, Dietmar Liebig, Thomas Fiehler, Jens Goyal, Mayank Saver, Jeffrey L. Gerloff, Christian Thomalla, Götz Tiedt, Steffen |
author_facet | Quandt, Fanny Flottmann, Fabian Madai, Vince I. Alegiani, Anna Küpper, Clemens Kellert, Lars Hilbert, Adam Frey, Dietmar Liebig, Thomas Fiehler, Jens Goyal, Mayank Saver, Jeffrey L. Gerloff, Christian Thomalla, Götz Tiedt, Steffen |
author_sort | Quandt, Fanny |
collection | PubMed |
description | Whether endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) improves functional outcome in patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke that do not comply with inclusion criteria of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) but that are considered for EVT in clinical practice is uncertain. We aimed to systematically identify patients with LVO stroke underrepresented in RCTs who might benefit from EVT. Following the premises that (i) patients without reperfusion after EVT represent a non-treated control group and (ii) the level of reperfusion affects outcome in patients with benefit from EVT but not in patients without treatment benefit, we systematically assessed the importance of reperfusion level on functional outcome prediction using machine learning in patients with LVO stroke treated with EVT in clinical practice (N = 5235, German-Stroke-Registry) and in patients treated with EVT or best medical management from RCTs (N = 1488, Virtual-International-Stroke-Trials-Archive). The importance of reperfusion level on outcome prediction in an RCT-like real-world cohort equaled the importance of EVT treatment allocation for outcome prediction in RCT data and was higher compared to an unselected real-world population. The importance of reperfusion level was magnified in patient groups underrepresented in RCTs, including patients with lower NIHSS scores (0–10), M2 occlusions, and lower ASPECTS (0–5 and 6–8). Reperfusion level was equally important in patients with vertebrobasilar as with anterior LVO stroke. The importance of reperfusion level for outcome prediction identifies patient target groups who likely benefit from EVT, including vertebrobasilar stroke patients and among patients underrepresented in RCT patients with low NIHSS scores, low ASPECTS, and M2 occlusions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12975-022-01040-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10159968 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101599682023-05-06 Machine Learning–Based Identification of Target Groups for Thrombectomy in Acute Stroke Quandt, Fanny Flottmann, Fabian Madai, Vince I. Alegiani, Anna Küpper, Clemens Kellert, Lars Hilbert, Adam Frey, Dietmar Liebig, Thomas Fiehler, Jens Goyal, Mayank Saver, Jeffrey L. Gerloff, Christian Thomalla, Götz Tiedt, Steffen Transl Stroke Res Original Article Whether endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) improves functional outcome in patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke that do not comply with inclusion criteria of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) but that are considered for EVT in clinical practice is uncertain. We aimed to systematically identify patients with LVO stroke underrepresented in RCTs who might benefit from EVT. Following the premises that (i) patients without reperfusion after EVT represent a non-treated control group and (ii) the level of reperfusion affects outcome in patients with benefit from EVT but not in patients without treatment benefit, we systematically assessed the importance of reperfusion level on functional outcome prediction using machine learning in patients with LVO stroke treated with EVT in clinical practice (N = 5235, German-Stroke-Registry) and in patients treated with EVT or best medical management from RCTs (N = 1488, Virtual-International-Stroke-Trials-Archive). The importance of reperfusion level on outcome prediction in an RCT-like real-world cohort equaled the importance of EVT treatment allocation for outcome prediction in RCT data and was higher compared to an unselected real-world population. The importance of reperfusion level was magnified in patient groups underrepresented in RCTs, including patients with lower NIHSS scores (0–10), M2 occlusions, and lower ASPECTS (0–5 and 6–8). Reperfusion level was equally important in patients with vertebrobasilar as with anterior LVO stroke. The importance of reperfusion level for outcome prediction identifies patient target groups who likely benefit from EVT, including vertebrobasilar stroke patients and among patients underrepresented in RCT patients with low NIHSS scores, low ASPECTS, and M2 occlusions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12975-022-01040-5. Springer US 2022-06-07 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10159968/ /pubmed/35670996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12975-022-01040-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Quandt, Fanny Flottmann, Fabian Madai, Vince I. Alegiani, Anna Küpper, Clemens Kellert, Lars Hilbert, Adam Frey, Dietmar Liebig, Thomas Fiehler, Jens Goyal, Mayank Saver, Jeffrey L. Gerloff, Christian Thomalla, Götz Tiedt, Steffen Machine Learning–Based Identification of Target Groups for Thrombectomy in Acute Stroke |
title | Machine Learning–Based Identification of Target Groups for Thrombectomy in Acute Stroke |
title_full | Machine Learning–Based Identification of Target Groups for Thrombectomy in Acute Stroke |
title_fullStr | Machine Learning–Based Identification of Target Groups for Thrombectomy in Acute Stroke |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine Learning–Based Identification of Target Groups for Thrombectomy in Acute Stroke |
title_short | Machine Learning–Based Identification of Target Groups for Thrombectomy in Acute Stroke |
title_sort | machine learning–based identification of target groups for thrombectomy in acute stroke |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10159968/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35670996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12975-022-01040-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quandtfanny machinelearningbasedidentificationoftargetgroupsforthrombectomyinacutestroke AT flottmannfabian machinelearningbasedidentificationoftargetgroupsforthrombectomyinacutestroke AT madaivincei machinelearningbasedidentificationoftargetgroupsforthrombectomyinacutestroke AT alegianianna machinelearningbasedidentificationoftargetgroupsforthrombectomyinacutestroke AT kupperclemens machinelearningbasedidentificationoftargetgroupsforthrombectomyinacutestroke AT kellertlars machinelearningbasedidentificationoftargetgroupsforthrombectomyinacutestroke AT hilbertadam machinelearningbasedidentificationoftargetgroupsforthrombectomyinacutestroke AT freydietmar machinelearningbasedidentificationoftargetgroupsforthrombectomyinacutestroke AT liebigthomas machinelearningbasedidentificationoftargetgroupsforthrombectomyinacutestroke AT fiehlerjens machinelearningbasedidentificationoftargetgroupsforthrombectomyinacutestroke AT goyalmayank machinelearningbasedidentificationoftargetgroupsforthrombectomyinacutestroke AT saverjeffreyl machinelearningbasedidentificationoftargetgroupsforthrombectomyinacutestroke AT gerloffchristian machinelearningbasedidentificationoftargetgroupsforthrombectomyinacutestroke AT thomallagotz machinelearningbasedidentificationoftargetgroupsforthrombectomyinacutestroke AT tiedtsteffen machinelearningbasedidentificationoftargetgroupsforthrombectomyinacutestroke AT machinelearningbasedidentificationoftargetgroupsforthrombectomyinacutestroke |