Cargando…

Prediction of conduction disturbances in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement

AIM: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) can cause intraventricular conduction disturbances (ICA), particularly left bundle branch block (BBB) and high-degree atrioventricular block (HAVB). The aim of this study was to investigate clinical, anatomical, procedural, and electrophysiological...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pavlicek, Valérie, Mahfoud, Felix, Bubel, Katharina, Fries, Peter, Ewen, Sebastian, Böhm, Michael, Scheller, Bruno, Ukena, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10160192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36680617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-023-02160-0
_version_ 1785037236709883904
author Pavlicek, Valérie
Mahfoud, Felix
Bubel, Katharina
Fries, Peter
Ewen, Sebastian
Böhm, Michael
Scheller, Bruno
Ukena, Christian
author_facet Pavlicek, Valérie
Mahfoud, Felix
Bubel, Katharina
Fries, Peter
Ewen, Sebastian
Böhm, Michael
Scheller, Bruno
Ukena, Christian
author_sort Pavlicek, Valérie
collection PubMed
description AIM: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) can cause intraventricular conduction disturbances (ICA), particularly left bundle branch block (BBB) and high-degree atrioventricular block (HAVB). The aim of this study was to investigate clinical, anatomical, procedural, and electrophysiological parameters predicting ICA after TAVR. METHODS: Patients with severe aortic stenosis (n = 203) without pacing devices undergoing TAVR with a self-expanding (n = 103) or balloon-expanding (n = 100) valve were enrolled. Clinical and anatomical parameters, such as length of the membranous septum (MS) and implantation depth, were assessed. His-ventricular interval (HVi) before and after implantation was determined. 12-lead-electrocardiograms (ECG) before, during and after 3 and 30 days after TAVR were analyzed for detection of any ICA. RESULTS: Among 203 consecutive patients (aortic valve area 0.78 ± 0.18 cm(2), age 80 ± 6 years, 54% male, left ventricular ejection fraction 52 ± 10%), TAVR led to a significant prolongation of infranodal conduction in all patients from 49 ± 10 ms to 59 ± 16 ms (p = 0.01). The HVi prolongation was independent of valve types, occurrence of HAVB or ICA. Fifteen patients (7%) developed HAVB requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation and 63 patients (31%) developed ICA within 30 days. Pre-existing BBB (OR 11.64; 95% CI 2.87–47.20; p = 0.001), new-onset left BBB (OR 15.72; 95% CI 3.05–81.03; p = 0.001), and diabetes mellitus (OR 3.88; 95% CI 1.30–15.99; p = 0.02) independently predicted HAVB requiring PPM. Neither pre-existing right BBB, a prolonged postHVi, increases in PR duration, any of the TAVR implantation procedural and anatomic nor echocardiographic characteristics were predictive for later HAVB. CONCLUSIONS: New-onset left BBB and diabetes mellitus independently predicted HAVB requiring PPM after TAVR and helped to identify patients at risk. Electrophysiologic study (EPS) of atrioventricular conduction was neither specific nor predictive of HAVB and can be skipped. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04128384 (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov). GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10160192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101601922023-05-06 Prediction of conduction disturbances in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement Pavlicek, Valérie Mahfoud, Felix Bubel, Katharina Fries, Peter Ewen, Sebastian Böhm, Michael Scheller, Bruno Ukena, Christian Clin Res Cardiol Original Paper AIM: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) can cause intraventricular conduction disturbances (ICA), particularly left bundle branch block (BBB) and high-degree atrioventricular block (HAVB). The aim of this study was to investigate clinical, anatomical, procedural, and electrophysiological parameters predicting ICA after TAVR. METHODS: Patients with severe aortic stenosis (n = 203) without pacing devices undergoing TAVR with a self-expanding (n = 103) or balloon-expanding (n = 100) valve were enrolled. Clinical and anatomical parameters, such as length of the membranous septum (MS) and implantation depth, were assessed. His-ventricular interval (HVi) before and after implantation was determined. 12-lead-electrocardiograms (ECG) before, during and after 3 and 30 days after TAVR were analyzed for detection of any ICA. RESULTS: Among 203 consecutive patients (aortic valve area 0.78 ± 0.18 cm(2), age 80 ± 6 years, 54% male, left ventricular ejection fraction 52 ± 10%), TAVR led to a significant prolongation of infranodal conduction in all patients from 49 ± 10 ms to 59 ± 16 ms (p = 0.01). The HVi prolongation was independent of valve types, occurrence of HAVB or ICA. Fifteen patients (7%) developed HAVB requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation and 63 patients (31%) developed ICA within 30 days. Pre-existing BBB (OR 11.64; 95% CI 2.87–47.20; p = 0.001), new-onset left BBB (OR 15.72; 95% CI 3.05–81.03; p = 0.001), and diabetes mellitus (OR 3.88; 95% CI 1.30–15.99; p = 0.02) independently predicted HAVB requiring PPM. Neither pre-existing right BBB, a prolonged postHVi, increases in PR duration, any of the TAVR implantation procedural and anatomic nor echocardiographic characteristics were predictive for later HAVB. CONCLUSIONS: New-onset left BBB and diabetes mellitus independently predicted HAVB requiring PPM after TAVR and helped to identify patients at risk. Electrophysiologic study (EPS) of atrioventricular conduction was neither specific nor predictive of HAVB and can be skipped. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04128384 (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov). GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-01-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10160192/ /pubmed/36680617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-023-02160-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Pavlicek, Valérie
Mahfoud, Felix
Bubel, Katharina
Fries, Peter
Ewen, Sebastian
Böhm, Michael
Scheller, Bruno
Ukena, Christian
Prediction of conduction disturbances in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title Prediction of conduction disturbances in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title_full Prediction of conduction disturbances in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title_fullStr Prediction of conduction disturbances in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of conduction disturbances in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title_short Prediction of conduction disturbances in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title_sort prediction of conduction disturbances in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10160192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36680617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-023-02160-0
work_keys_str_mv AT pavlicekvalerie predictionofconductiondisturbancesinpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT mahfoudfelix predictionofconductiondisturbancesinpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT bubelkatharina predictionofconductiondisturbancesinpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT friespeter predictionofconductiondisturbancesinpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT ewensebastian predictionofconductiondisturbancesinpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT bohmmichael predictionofconductiondisturbancesinpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT schellerbruno predictionofconductiondisturbancesinpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT ukenachristian predictionofconductiondisturbancesinpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement