Cargando…

Perioperative external ventricular drainage vs. no-EVD strategy in pediatric posterior fossa tumors—pilot study results

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric brain tumors of the posterior fossa often present with occlusive hydrocephalus. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) or ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS) has been established for definite hydrocephalus treatment. The aim of the study was to analyze the impact and safety o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krause, Matthias, Meixensberger, Jürgen, von Einsiedel, Hagen Graf, Gräfe, Daniel, Nestler, Ulf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10160201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36637468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-022-05819-7
_version_ 1785037238592077824
author Krause, Matthias
Meixensberger, Jürgen
von Einsiedel, Hagen Graf
Gräfe, Daniel
Nestler, Ulf
author_facet Krause, Matthias
Meixensberger, Jürgen
von Einsiedel, Hagen Graf
Gräfe, Daniel
Nestler, Ulf
author_sort Krause, Matthias
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Pediatric brain tumors of the posterior fossa often present with occlusive hydrocephalus. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) or ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS) has been established for definite hydrocephalus treatment. The aim of the study was to analyze the impact and safety of perioperative temporary external ventricular CSF drainage (EVD) placement on postoperative hydrocephalus outcome compared to a no-EVD strategy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective database, 36 posterior fossa tumor patients of 2–18 years were included with a follow-up of 1 year. Fifty-eight percent presented with preoperative hydrocephalus. Patients were assigned to non-hydrocephalus group: group I (n = 15) and to preoperative hydrocephalus, group IIa with EVD placement (n = 9), and group IIb without EVD (n = 12). RESULTS: Median age of patients was 8.1 years (range 3.17 to 16.58 years). One-third of 21 hydrocephalus patients required ETV or VPS (n = 7). Occurrence of de novo hydrocephalus in group I after surgery was not observed in our cohort. Age and histology were no confounding factor for EVD placement between group IIa and IIb (p = 0.34). The use of EVD did not result in better control of hydrocephalus compared to no-EVD patients considering pre- and postoperative MRI ventricular indices (p = 0.4). Perioperative placement of an EVD resulted in a threefold risk for subsequent VPS or ETV (group IIa 55.5% vs group IIb 16.6%): relative risk for EVD patients compared to no-EVD patients with hydrocephalus was 3.3 (CI = 1.06–13.43, p = 0.09). CONCLUSION: Perioperative EVD placement appears to harbor a threefold relative risk of requiring subsequent permanent CSF diversion in children above 2 years. EVD was not more effective to control ventricular enlargement compared to tumor removal alone. The no-EVD strategy was safe and did not result in postoperative complications. Thus, to evaluate potential adverse effects on hydrocephalus outcome by EVD placement, a prospective study is warranted to falsify the results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10160201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101602012023-05-06 Perioperative external ventricular drainage vs. no-EVD strategy in pediatric posterior fossa tumors—pilot study results Krause, Matthias Meixensberger, Jürgen von Einsiedel, Hagen Graf Gräfe, Daniel Nestler, Ulf Childs Nerv Syst Original Article INTRODUCTION: Pediatric brain tumors of the posterior fossa often present with occlusive hydrocephalus. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) or ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS) has been established for definite hydrocephalus treatment. The aim of the study was to analyze the impact and safety of perioperative temporary external ventricular CSF drainage (EVD) placement on postoperative hydrocephalus outcome compared to a no-EVD strategy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective database, 36 posterior fossa tumor patients of 2–18 years were included with a follow-up of 1 year. Fifty-eight percent presented with preoperative hydrocephalus. Patients were assigned to non-hydrocephalus group: group I (n = 15) and to preoperative hydrocephalus, group IIa with EVD placement (n = 9), and group IIb without EVD (n = 12). RESULTS: Median age of patients was 8.1 years (range 3.17 to 16.58 years). One-third of 21 hydrocephalus patients required ETV or VPS (n = 7). Occurrence of de novo hydrocephalus in group I after surgery was not observed in our cohort. Age and histology were no confounding factor for EVD placement between group IIa and IIb (p = 0.34). The use of EVD did not result in better control of hydrocephalus compared to no-EVD patients considering pre- and postoperative MRI ventricular indices (p = 0.4). Perioperative placement of an EVD resulted in a threefold risk for subsequent VPS or ETV (group IIa 55.5% vs group IIb 16.6%): relative risk for EVD patients compared to no-EVD patients with hydrocephalus was 3.3 (CI = 1.06–13.43, p = 0.09). CONCLUSION: Perioperative EVD placement appears to harbor a threefold relative risk of requiring subsequent permanent CSF diversion in children above 2 years. EVD was not more effective to control ventricular enlargement compared to tumor removal alone. The no-EVD strategy was safe and did not result in postoperative complications. Thus, to evaluate potential adverse effects on hydrocephalus outcome by EVD placement, a prospective study is warranted to falsify the results. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-01-13 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10160201/ /pubmed/36637468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-022-05819-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Krause, Matthias
Meixensberger, Jürgen
von Einsiedel, Hagen Graf
Gräfe, Daniel
Nestler, Ulf
Perioperative external ventricular drainage vs. no-EVD strategy in pediatric posterior fossa tumors—pilot study results
title Perioperative external ventricular drainage vs. no-EVD strategy in pediatric posterior fossa tumors—pilot study results
title_full Perioperative external ventricular drainage vs. no-EVD strategy in pediatric posterior fossa tumors—pilot study results
title_fullStr Perioperative external ventricular drainage vs. no-EVD strategy in pediatric posterior fossa tumors—pilot study results
title_full_unstemmed Perioperative external ventricular drainage vs. no-EVD strategy in pediatric posterior fossa tumors—pilot study results
title_short Perioperative external ventricular drainage vs. no-EVD strategy in pediatric posterior fossa tumors—pilot study results
title_sort perioperative external ventricular drainage vs. no-evd strategy in pediatric posterior fossa tumors—pilot study results
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10160201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36637468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-022-05819-7
work_keys_str_mv AT krausematthias perioperativeexternalventriculardrainagevsnoevdstrategyinpediatricposteriorfossatumorspilotstudyresults
AT meixensbergerjurgen perioperativeexternalventriculardrainagevsnoevdstrategyinpediatricposteriorfossatumorspilotstudyresults
AT voneinsiedelhagengraf perioperativeexternalventriculardrainagevsnoevdstrategyinpediatricposteriorfossatumorspilotstudyresults
AT grafedaniel perioperativeexternalventriculardrainagevsnoevdstrategyinpediatricposteriorfossatumorspilotstudyresults
AT nestlerulf perioperativeexternalventriculardrainagevsnoevdstrategyinpediatricposteriorfossatumorspilotstudyresults