Cargando…
Perioperative external ventricular drainage vs. no-EVD strategy in pediatric posterior fossa tumors—pilot study results
INTRODUCTION: Pediatric brain tumors of the posterior fossa often present with occlusive hydrocephalus. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) or ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS) has been established for definite hydrocephalus treatment. The aim of the study was to analyze the impact and safety o...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10160201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36637468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-022-05819-7 |
_version_ | 1785037238592077824 |
---|---|
author | Krause, Matthias Meixensberger, Jürgen von Einsiedel, Hagen Graf Gräfe, Daniel Nestler, Ulf |
author_facet | Krause, Matthias Meixensberger, Jürgen von Einsiedel, Hagen Graf Gräfe, Daniel Nestler, Ulf |
author_sort | Krause, Matthias |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Pediatric brain tumors of the posterior fossa often present with occlusive hydrocephalus. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) or ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS) has been established for definite hydrocephalus treatment. The aim of the study was to analyze the impact and safety of perioperative temporary external ventricular CSF drainage (EVD) placement on postoperative hydrocephalus outcome compared to a no-EVD strategy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective database, 36 posterior fossa tumor patients of 2–18 years were included with a follow-up of 1 year. Fifty-eight percent presented with preoperative hydrocephalus. Patients were assigned to non-hydrocephalus group: group I (n = 15) and to preoperative hydrocephalus, group IIa with EVD placement (n = 9), and group IIb without EVD (n = 12). RESULTS: Median age of patients was 8.1 years (range 3.17 to 16.58 years). One-third of 21 hydrocephalus patients required ETV or VPS (n = 7). Occurrence of de novo hydrocephalus in group I after surgery was not observed in our cohort. Age and histology were no confounding factor for EVD placement between group IIa and IIb (p = 0.34). The use of EVD did not result in better control of hydrocephalus compared to no-EVD patients considering pre- and postoperative MRI ventricular indices (p = 0.4). Perioperative placement of an EVD resulted in a threefold risk for subsequent VPS or ETV (group IIa 55.5% vs group IIb 16.6%): relative risk for EVD patients compared to no-EVD patients with hydrocephalus was 3.3 (CI = 1.06–13.43, p = 0.09). CONCLUSION: Perioperative EVD placement appears to harbor a threefold relative risk of requiring subsequent permanent CSF diversion in children above 2 years. EVD was not more effective to control ventricular enlargement compared to tumor removal alone. The no-EVD strategy was safe and did not result in postoperative complications. Thus, to evaluate potential adverse effects on hydrocephalus outcome by EVD placement, a prospective study is warranted to falsify the results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10160201 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101602012023-05-06 Perioperative external ventricular drainage vs. no-EVD strategy in pediatric posterior fossa tumors—pilot study results Krause, Matthias Meixensberger, Jürgen von Einsiedel, Hagen Graf Gräfe, Daniel Nestler, Ulf Childs Nerv Syst Original Article INTRODUCTION: Pediatric brain tumors of the posterior fossa often present with occlusive hydrocephalus. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) or ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS) has been established for definite hydrocephalus treatment. The aim of the study was to analyze the impact and safety of perioperative temporary external ventricular CSF drainage (EVD) placement on postoperative hydrocephalus outcome compared to a no-EVD strategy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective database, 36 posterior fossa tumor patients of 2–18 years were included with a follow-up of 1 year. Fifty-eight percent presented with preoperative hydrocephalus. Patients were assigned to non-hydrocephalus group: group I (n = 15) and to preoperative hydrocephalus, group IIa with EVD placement (n = 9), and group IIb without EVD (n = 12). RESULTS: Median age of patients was 8.1 years (range 3.17 to 16.58 years). One-third of 21 hydrocephalus patients required ETV or VPS (n = 7). Occurrence of de novo hydrocephalus in group I after surgery was not observed in our cohort. Age and histology were no confounding factor for EVD placement between group IIa and IIb (p = 0.34). The use of EVD did not result in better control of hydrocephalus compared to no-EVD patients considering pre- and postoperative MRI ventricular indices (p = 0.4). Perioperative placement of an EVD resulted in a threefold risk for subsequent VPS or ETV (group IIa 55.5% vs group IIb 16.6%): relative risk for EVD patients compared to no-EVD patients with hydrocephalus was 3.3 (CI = 1.06–13.43, p = 0.09). CONCLUSION: Perioperative EVD placement appears to harbor a threefold relative risk of requiring subsequent permanent CSF diversion in children above 2 years. EVD was not more effective to control ventricular enlargement compared to tumor removal alone. The no-EVD strategy was safe and did not result in postoperative complications. Thus, to evaluate potential adverse effects on hydrocephalus outcome by EVD placement, a prospective study is warranted to falsify the results. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-01-13 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10160201/ /pubmed/36637468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-022-05819-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Krause, Matthias Meixensberger, Jürgen von Einsiedel, Hagen Graf Gräfe, Daniel Nestler, Ulf Perioperative external ventricular drainage vs. no-EVD strategy in pediatric posterior fossa tumors—pilot study results |
title | Perioperative external ventricular drainage vs. no-EVD strategy in pediatric posterior fossa tumors—pilot study results |
title_full | Perioperative external ventricular drainage vs. no-EVD strategy in pediatric posterior fossa tumors—pilot study results |
title_fullStr | Perioperative external ventricular drainage vs. no-EVD strategy in pediatric posterior fossa tumors—pilot study results |
title_full_unstemmed | Perioperative external ventricular drainage vs. no-EVD strategy in pediatric posterior fossa tumors—pilot study results |
title_short | Perioperative external ventricular drainage vs. no-EVD strategy in pediatric posterior fossa tumors—pilot study results |
title_sort | perioperative external ventricular drainage vs. no-evd strategy in pediatric posterior fossa tumors—pilot study results |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10160201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36637468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-022-05819-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krausematthias perioperativeexternalventriculardrainagevsnoevdstrategyinpediatricposteriorfossatumorspilotstudyresults AT meixensbergerjurgen perioperativeexternalventriculardrainagevsnoevdstrategyinpediatricposteriorfossatumorspilotstudyresults AT voneinsiedelhagengraf perioperativeexternalventriculardrainagevsnoevdstrategyinpediatricposteriorfossatumorspilotstudyresults AT grafedaniel perioperativeexternalventriculardrainagevsnoevdstrategyinpediatricposteriorfossatumorspilotstudyresults AT nestlerulf perioperativeexternalventriculardrainagevsnoevdstrategyinpediatricposteriorfossatumorspilotstudyresults |