Cargando…

Comparisons of the effects of two types of titratable mandibular advancement devices on respiratory parameters and upper airway dimensions in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of two types of titratable mandibular advancement devices (MADs), namely MAD-H (allowing limited vertical opening) and MAD-S (allowing free vertical opening), on respiratory parameters and upper airway dimensions in patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Xiaoxin, Lobbezoo, Frank, Chen, Hui, Rosenmöller, Boudewijn R. A. M., Berkhout, Erwin, de Lange, Jan, Aarab, Ghizlane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10160211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36928350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-04945-z
_version_ 1785037240984928256
author Shi, Xiaoxin
Lobbezoo, Frank
Chen, Hui
Rosenmöller, Boudewijn R. A. M.
Berkhout, Erwin
de Lange, Jan
Aarab, Ghizlane
author_facet Shi, Xiaoxin
Lobbezoo, Frank
Chen, Hui
Rosenmöller, Boudewijn R. A. M.
Berkhout, Erwin
de Lange, Jan
Aarab, Ghizlane
author_sort Shi, Xiaoxin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of two types of titratable mandibular advancement devices (MADs), namely MAD-H (allowing limited vertical opening) and MAD-S (allowing free vertical opening), on respiratory parameters and upper airway dimensions in patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with mild to moderate OSA (5 ≤ apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) < 30 /h) were randomly assigned to two parallel MAD groups. All MADs were subjectively titrated according to a standardized protocol during a 3-month follow-up. Every patient underwent two polysomnographic recordings, and two cone beam computed tomography scans in supine position: one at baseline and another one after 3 months with the MAD in situ. The primary outcome variables were the AHI in supine position (AHI-supine) and the minimal cross-sectional area of the upper airway in supine position (CSAmin-supine). RESULTS: A total of 49 patients were recruited, and 31 patients (21 men and 10 women) with a mean (± SD) age of 48.5 (± 13.9) years and a mean AHI of 16.6 (± 6.7) /h completed the study. In the per-protocol analysis, there was no significant difference between MAD-H (n = 16) and MAD-S (n = 15) in their effects on AHI-supine (P = 0.14) and CSAmin-supine (P = 0.59). Similar results were found in the intention-to-treat analysis (P = 0.47 and 0.57, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, we conclude that there is no significant difference in the effects of an MAD allowing limited vertical opening and an MAD allowing free vertical opening on respiratory parameters and upper airway dimensions in patients with mild to moderate OSA. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: MADs allowing limited vertical opening and allowing free vertical opening have similar effects on respiratory parameters and upper airway dimensions in patients with mild to moderate OSA. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02724865. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02724865
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10160211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101602112023-05-06 Comparisons of the effects of two types of titratable mandibular advancement devices on respiratory parameters and upper airway dimensions in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial Shi, Xiaoxin Lobbezoo, Frank Chen, Hui Rosenmöller, Boudewijn R. A. M. Berkhout, Erwin de Lange, Jan Aarab, Ghizlane Clin Oral Investig Research OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of two types of titratable mandibular advancement devices (MADs), namely MAD-H (allowing limited vertical opening) and MAD-S (allowing free vertical opening), on respiratory parameters and upper airway dimensions in patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with mild to moderate OSA (5 ≤ apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) < 30 /h) were randomly assigned to two parallel MAD groups. All MADs were subjectively titrated according to a standardized protocol during a 3-month follow-up. Every patient underwent two polysomnographic recordings, and two cone beam computed tomography scans in supine position: one at baseline and another one after 3 months with the MAD in situ. The primary outcome variables were the AHI in supine position (AHI-supine) and the minimal cross-sectional area of the upper airway in supine position (CSAmin-supine). RESULTS: A total of 49 patients were recruited, and 31 patients (21 men and 10 women) with a mean (± SD) age of 48.5 (± 13.9) years and a mean AHI of 16.6 (± 6.7) /h completed the study. In the per-protocol analysis, there was no significant difference between MAD-H (n = 16) and MAD-S (n = 15) in their effects on AHI-supine (P = 0.14) and CSAmin-supine (P = 0.59). Similar results were found in the intention-to-treat analysis (P = 0.47 and 0.57, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, we conclude that there is no significant difference in the effects of an MAD allowing limited vertical opening and an MAD allowing free vertical opening on respiratory parameters and upper airway dimensions in patients with mild to moderate OSA. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: MADs allowing limited vertical opening and allowing free vertical opening have similar effects on respiratory parameters and upper airway dimensions in patients with mild to moderate OSA. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02724865. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02724865 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-17 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10160211/ /pubmed/36928350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-04945-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Shi, Xiaoxin
Lobbezoo, Frank
Chen, Hui
Rosenmöller, Boudewijn R. A. M.
Berkhout, Erwin
de Lange, Jan
Aarab, Ghizlane
Comparisons of the effects of two types of titratable mandibular advancement devices on respiratory parameters and upper airway dimensions in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial
title Comparisons of the effects of two types of titratable mandibular advancement devices on respiratory parameters and upper airway dimensions in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparisons of the effects of two types of titratable mandibular advancement devices on respiratory parameters and upper airway dimensions in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparisons of the effects of two types of titratable mandibular advancement devices on respiratory parameters and upper airway dimensions in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons of the effects of two types of titratable mandibular advancement devices on respiratory parameters and upper airway dimensions in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparisons of the effects of two types of titratable mandibular advancement devices on respiratory parameters and upper airway dimensions in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparisons of the effects of two types of titratable mandibular advancement devices on respiratory parameters and upper airway dimensions in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10160211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36928350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-04945-z
work_keys_str_mv AT shixiaoxin comparisonsoftheeffectsoftwotypesoftitratablemandibularadvancementdevicesonrespiratoryparametersandupperairwaydimensionsinpatientswithobstructivesleepapneaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lobbezoofrank comparisonsoftheeffectsoftwotypesoftitratablemandibularadvancementdevicesonrespiratoryparametersandupperairwaydimensionsinpatientswithobstructivesleepapneaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chenhui comparisonsoftheeffectsoftwotypesoftitratablemandibularadvancementdevicesonrespiratoryparametersandupperairwaydimensionsinpatientswithobstructivesleepapneaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rosenmollerboudewijnram comparisonsoftheeffectsoftwotypesoftitratablemandibularadvancementdevicesonrespiratoryparametersandupperairwaydimensionsinpatientswithobstructivesleepapneaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT berkhouterwin comparisonsoftheeffectsoftwotypesoftitratablemandibularadvancementdevicesonrespiratoryparametersandupperairwaydimensionsinpatientswithobstructivesleepapneaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT delangejan comparisonsoftheeffectsoftwotypesoftitratablemandibularadvancementdevicesonrespiratoryparametersandupperairwaydimensionsinpatientswithobstructivesleepapneaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT aarabghizlane comparisonsoftheeffectsoftwotypesoftitratablemandibularadvancementdevicesonrespiratoryparametersandupperairwaydimensionsinpatientswithobstructivesleepapneaarandomizedcontrolledtrial