Cargando…

Comparison of plug-based versus suture-based vascular closure for large-bore arterial access: a collaborative meta-analysis of observational and randomized studies

BACKGROUND: Large-bore arteriotomies can be percutaneously closed with suture-based or plug-based vascular closure device (VCD) strategies. The efficacy of both techniques remains controversial. AIMS: We conducted a meta-analysis of comparative studies between both VCD strategies, focusing on the mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dumpies, Oliver, Jobs, Alexander, Obradovic, Danilo, van Wiechen, Maarten, Hartung, Philipp, Rotta detto Loria, Johannes, Wilde, Johannes, Majunke, Nicolas, Kiefer, Philipp, Noack, Thilo, Thiele, Holger, van Mieghem, Nicolas, Desch, Steffen, Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10160216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36749418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02145-5
_version_ 1785037241931792384
author Dumpies, Oliver
Jobs, Alexander
Obradovic, Danilo
van Wiechen, Maarten
Hartung, Philipp
Rotta detto Loria, Johannes
Wilde, Johannes
Majunke, Nicolas
Kiefer, Philipp
Noack, Thilo
Thiele, Holger
van Mieghem, Nicolas
Desch, Steffen
Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed
author_facet Dumpies, Oliver
Jobs, Alexander
Obradovic, Danilo
van Wiechen, Maarten
Hartung, Philipp
Rotta detto Loria, Johannes
Wilde, Johannes
Majunke, Nicolas
Kiefer, Philipp
Noack, Thilo
Thiele, Holger
van Mieghem, Nicolas
Desch, Steffen
Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed
author_sort Dumpies, Oliver
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Large-bore arteriotomies can be percutaneously closed with suture-based or plug-based vascular closure device (VCD) strategies. The efficacy of both techniques remains controversial. AIMS: We conducted a meta-analysis of comparative studies between both VCD strategies, focusing on the most commonly applied VCDs (MANTA and ProGlide). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google scholar for observational studies (OS) and randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing vascular closure with the MANTA-based and the ProGlide-based technique. The principal endpoint of this analysis was access-site related vascular complications. Both study types were analyzed separately. RESULTS: Access-site related vascular complications were less frequent after vascular closure with the MANTA technique in the analysis of OS (RR 0.61 [95%CI 0.43–0.89], p = 0.01, I(2) = 0%), but more frequent in the analysis of RCT data (RR 1.70 [95%CI 1.16–2.51], p = 0.01, I(2) = 0%). Both data sets provided no significant difference between the VCD techniques in terms of overall bleeding events (OS: RR 0.57 [95%CI 0.32–1.02], p = 0.06, I(2) = 70%; and RCT: RR 1.37 [95%CI 0.82–2.28], p = 0.23, I(2) = 30%). RCT data showed that endovascular stenting or vascular surgery due to VCD failure occurred more often after MANTA application (RR 3.53 [95%CI 1.07–11.33], p = 0.04, I(2) = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: While OS point to favorable outcomes for large-bore vascular closure with the MANTA-based technique, RCT data show that this strategy is associated with more access-site related vascular complications as well as endovascular stenting or vascular surgery due to device failure compared with the ProGlide-based technique. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-022-02145-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10160216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101602162023-05-06 Comparison of plug-based versus suture-based vascular closure for large-bore arterial access: a collaborative meta-analysis of observational and randomized studies Dumpies, Oliver Jobs, Alexander Obradovic, Danilo van Wiechen, Maarten Hartung, Philipp Rotta detto Loria, Johannes Wilde, Johannes Majunke, Nicolas Kiefer, Philipp Noack, Thilo Thiele, Holger van Mieghem, Nicolas Desch, Steffen Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed Clin Res Cardiol Original Paper BACKGROUND: Large-bore arteriotomies can be percutaneously closed with suture-based or plug-based vascular closure device (VCD) strategies. The efficacy of both techniques remains controversial. AIMS: We conducted a meta-analysis of comparative studies between both VCD strategies, focusing on the most commonly applied VCDs (MANTA and ProGlide). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google scholar for observational studies (OS) and randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing vascular closure with the MANTA-based and the ProGlide-based technique. The principal endpoint of this analysis was access-site related vascular complications. Both study types were analyzed separately. RESULTS: Access-site related vascular complications were less frequent after vascular closure with the MANTA technique in the analysis of OS (RR 0.61 [95%CI 0.43–0.89], p = 0.01, I(2) = 0%), but more frequent in the analysis of RCT data (RR 1.70 [95%CI 1.16–2.51], p = 0.01, I(2) = 0%). Both data sets provided no significant difference between the VCD techniques in terms of overall bleeding events (OS: RR 0.57 [95%CI 0.32–1.02], p = 0.06, I(2) = 70%; and RCT: RR 1.37 [95%CI 0.82–2.28], p = 0.23, I(2) = 30%). RCT data showed that endovascular stenting or vascular surgery due to VCD failure occurred more often after MANTA application (RR 3.53 [95%CI 1.07–11.33], p = 0.04, I(2) = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: While OS point to favorable outcomes for large-bore vascular closure with the MANTA-based technique, RCT data show that this strategy is associated with more access-site related vascular complications as well as endovascular stenting or vascular surgery due to device failure compared with the ProGlide-based technique. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-022-02145-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-02-07 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10160216/ /pubmed/36749418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02145-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Dumpies, Oliver
Jobs, Alexander
Obradovic, Danilo
van Wiechen, Maarten
Hartung, Philipp
Rotta detto Loria, Johannes
Wilde, Johannes
Majunke, Nicolas
Kiefer, Philipp
Noack, Thilo
Thiele, Holger
van Mieghem, Nicolas
Desch, Steffen
Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed
Comparison of plug-based versus suture-based vascular closure for large-bore arterial access: a collaborative meta-analysis of observational and randomized studies
title Comparison of plug-based versus suture-based vascular closure for large-bore arterial access: a collaborative meta-analysis of observational and randomized studies
title_full Comparison of plug-based versus suture-based vascular closure for large-bore arterial access: a collaborative meta-analysis of observational and randomized studies
title_fullStr Comparison of plug-based versus suture-based vascular closure for large-bore arterial access: a collaborative meta-analysis of observational and randomized studies
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of plug-based versus suture-based vascular closure for large-bore arterial access: a collaborative meta-analysis of observational and randomized studies
title_short Comparison of plug-based versus suture-based vascular closure for large-bore arterial access: a collaborative meta-analysis of observational and randomized studies
title_sort comparison of plug-based versus suture-based vascular closure for large-bore arterial access: a collaborative meta-analysis of observational and randomized studies
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10160216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36749418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02145-5
work_keys_str_mv AT dumpiesoliver comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies
AT jobsalexander comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies
AT obradovicdanilo comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies
AT vanwiechenmaarten comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies
AT hartungphilipp comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies
AT rottadettoloriajohannes comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies
AT wildejohannes comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies
AT majunkenicolas comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies
AT kieferphilipp comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies
AT noackthilo comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies
AT thieleholger comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies
AT vanmieghemnicolas comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies
AT deschsteffen comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies
AT abdelwahabmohamed comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies