Cargando…
Comparison of plug-based versus suture-based vascular closure for large-bore arterial access: a collaborative meta-analysis of observational and randomized studies
BACKGROUND: Large-bore arteriotomies can be percutaneously closed with suture-based or plug-based vascular closure device (VCD) strategies. The efficacy of both techniques remains controversial. AIMS: We conducted a meta-analysis of comparative studies between both VCD strategies, focusing on the mo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10160216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36749418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02145-5 |
_version_ | 1785037241931792384 |
---|---|
author | Dumpies, Oliver Jobs, Alexander Obradovic, Danilo van Wiechen, Maarten Hartung, Philipp Rotta detto Loria, Johannes Wilde, Johannes Majunke, Nicolas Kiefer, Philipp Noack, Thilo Thiele, Holger van Mieghem, Nicolas Desch, Steffen Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed |
author_facet | Dumpies, Oliver Jobs, Alexander Obradovic, Danilo van Wiechen, Maarten Hartung, Philipp Rotta detto Loria, Johannes Wilde, Johannes Majunke, Nicolas Kiefer, Philipp Noack, Thilo Thiele, Holger van Mieghem, Nicolas Desch, Steffen Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed |
author_sort | Dumpies, Oliver |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Large-bore arteriotomies can be percutaneously closed with suture-based or plug-based vascular closure device (VCD) strategies. The efficacy of both techniques remains controversial. AIMS: We conducted a meta-analysis of comparative studies between both VCD strategies, focusing on the most commonly applied VCDs (MANTA and ProGlide). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google scholar for observational studies (OS) and randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing vascular closure with the MANTA-based and the ProGlide-based technique. The principal endpoint of this analysis was access-site related vascular complications. Both study types were analyzed separately. RESULTS: Access-site related vascular complications were less frequent after vascular closure with the MANTA technique in the analysis of OS (RR 0.61 [95%CI 0.43–0.89], p = 0.01, I(2) = 0%), but more frequent in the analysis of RCT data (RR 1.70 [95%CI 1.16–2.51], p = 0.01, I(2) = 0%). Both data sets provided no significant difference between the VCD techniques in terms of overall bleeding events (OS: RR 0.57 [95%CI 0.32–1.02], p = 0.06, I(2) = 70%; and RCT: RR 1.37 [95%CI 0.82–2.28], p = 0.23, I(2) = 30%). RCT data showed that endovascular stenting or vascular surgery due to VCD failure occurred more often after MANTA application (RR 3.53 [95%CI 1.07–11.33], p = 0.04, I(2) = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: While OS point to favorable outcomes for large-bore vascular closure with the MANTA-based technique, RCT data show that this strategy is associated with more access-site related vascular complications as well as endovascular stenting or vascular surgery due to device failure compared with the ProGlide-based technique. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-022-02145-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10160216 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101602162023-05-06 Comparison of plug-based versus suture-based vascular closure for large-bore arterial access: a collaborative meta-analysis of observational and randomized studies Dumpies, Oliver Jobs, Alexander Obradovic, Danilo van Wiechen, Maarten Hartung, Philipp Rotta detto Loria, Johannes Wilde, Johannes Majunke, Nicolas Kiefer, Philipp Noack, Thilo Thiele, Holger van Mieghem, Nicolas Desch, Steffen Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed Clin Res Cardiol Original Paper BACKGROUND: Large-bore arteriotomies can be percutaneously closed with suture-based or plug-based vascular closure device (VCD) strategies. The efficacy of both techniques remains controversial. AIMS: We conducted a meta-analysis of comparative studies between both VCD strategies, focusing on the most commonly applied VCDs (MANTA and ProGlide). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google scholar for observational studies (OS) and randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing vascular closure with the MANTA-based and the ProGlide-based technique. The principal endpoint of this analysis was access-site related vascular complications. Both study types were analyzed separately. RESULTS: Access-site related vascular complications were less frequent after vascular closure with the MANTA technique in the analysis of OS (RR 0.61 [95%CI 0.43–0.89], p = 0.01, I(2) = 0%), but more frequent in the analysis of RCT data (RR 1.70 [95%CI 1.16–2.51], p = 0.01, I(2) = 0%). Both data sets provided no significant difference between the VCD techniques in terms of overall bleeding events (OS: RR 0.57 [95%CI 0.32–1.02], p = 0.06, I(2) = 70%; and RCT: RR 1.37 [95%CI 0.82–2.28], p = 0.23, I(2) = 30%). RCT data showed that endovascular stenting or vascular surgery due to VCD failure occurred more often after MANTA application (RR 3.53 [95%CI 1.07–11.33], p = 0.04, I(2) = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: While OS point to favorable outcomes for large-bore vascular closure with the MANTA-based technique, RCT data show that this strategy is associated with more access-site related vascular complications as well as endovascular stenting or vascular surgery due to device failure compared with the ProGlide-based technique. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-022-02145-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-02-07 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10160216/ /pubmed/36749418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02145-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Dumpies, Oliver Jobs, Alexander Obradovic, Danilo van Wiechen, Maarten Hartung, Philipp Rotta detto Loria, Johannes Wilde, Johannes Majunke, Nicolas Kiefer, Philipp Noack, Thilo Thiele, Holger van Mieghem, Nicolas Desch, Steffen Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed Comparison of plug-based versus suture-based vascular closure for large-bore arterial access: a collaborative meta-analysis of observational and randomized studies |
title | Comparison of plug-based versus suture-based vascular closure for large-bore arterial access: a collaborative meta-analysis of observational and randomized studies |
title_full | Comparison of plug-based versus suture-based vascular closure for large-bore arterial access: a collaborative meta-analysis of observational and randomized studies |
title_fullStr | Comparison of plug-based versus suture-based vascular closure for large-bore arterial access: a collaborative meta-analysis of observational and randomized studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of plug-based versus suture-based vascular closure for large-bore arterial access: a collaborative meta-analysis of observational and randomized studies |
title_short | Comparison of plug-based versus suture-based vascular closure for large-bore arterial access: a collaborative meta-analysis of observational and randomized studies |
title_sort | comparison of plug-based versus suture-based vascular closure for large-bore arterial access: a collaborative meta-analysis of observational and randomized studies |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10160216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36749418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02145-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dumpiesoliver comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies AT jobsalexander comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies AT obradovicdanilo comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies AT vanwiechenmaarten comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies AT hartungphilipp comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies AT rottadettoloriajohannes comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies AT wildejohannes comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies AT majunkenicolas comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies AT kieferphilipp comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies AT noackthilo comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies AT thieleholger comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies AT vanmieghemnicolas comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies AT deschsteffen comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies AT abdelwahabmohamed comparisonofplugbasedversussuturebasedvascularclosureforlargeborearterialaccessacollaborativemetaanalysisofobservationalandrandomizedstudies |