Cargando…
CheckList for EvaluAtion of Radiomics research (CLEAR): a step-by-step reporting guideline for authors and reviewers endorsed by ESR and EuSoMII
Even though radiomics can hold great potential for supporting clinical decision-making, its current use is mostly limited to academic research, without applications in routine clinical practice. The workflow of radiomics is complex due to several methodological steps and nuances, which often leads t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10160267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37142815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01415-8 |
_version_ | 1785037249155432448 |
---|---|
author | Kocak, Burak Baessler, Bettina Bakas, Spyridon Cuocolo, Renato Fedorov, Andrey Maier-Hein, Lena Mercaldo, Nathaniel Müller, Henning Orlhac, Fanny Pinto dos Santos, Daniel Stanzione, Arnaldo Ugga, Lorenzo Zwanenburg, Alex |
author_facet | Kocak, Burak Baessler, Bettina Bakas, Spyridon Cuocolo, Renato Fedorov, Andrey Maier-Hein, Lena Mercaldo, Nathaniel Müller, Henning Orlhac, Fanny Pinto dos Santos, Daniel Stanzione, Arnaldo Ugga, Lorenzo Zwanenburg, Alex |
author_sort | Kocak, Burak |
collection | PubMed |
description | Even though radiomics can hold great potential for supporting clinical decision-making, its current use is mostly limited to academic research, without applications in routine clinical practice. The workflow of radiomics is complex due to several methodological steps and nuances, which often leads to inadequate reporting and evaluation, and poor reproducibility. Available reporting guidelines and checklists for artificial intelligence and predictive modeling include relevant good practices, but they are not tailored to radiomic research. There is a clear need for a complete radiomics checklist for study planning, manuscript writing, and evaluation during the review process to facilitate the repeatability and reproducibility of studies. We here present a documentation standard for radiomic research that can guide authors and reviewers. Our motivation is to improve the quality and reliability and, in turn, the reproducibility of radiomic research. We name the checklist CLEAR (CheckList for EvaluAtion of Radiomics research), to convey the idea of being more transparent. With its 58 items, the CLEAR checklist should be considered a standardization tool providing the minimum requirements for presenting clinical radiomics research. In addition to a dynamic online version of the checklist, a public repository has also been set up to allow the radiomics community to comment on the checklist items and adapt the checklist for future versions. Prepared and revised by an international group of experts using a modified Delphi method, we hope the CLEAR checklist will serve well as a single and complete scientific documentation tool for authors and reviewers to improve the radiomics literature. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-023-01415-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10160267 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101602672023-05-06 CheckList for EvaluAtion of Radiomics research (CLEAR): a step-by-step reporting guideline for authors and reviewers endorsed by ESR and EuSoMII Kocak, Burak Baessler, Bettina Bakas, Spyridon Cuocolo, Renato Fedorov, Andrey Maier-Hein, Lena Mercaldo, Nathaniel Müller, Henning Orlhac, Fanny Pinto dos Santos, Daniel Stanzione, Arnaldo Ugga, Lorenzo Zwanenburg, Alex Insights Imaging Guideline Even though radiomics can hold great potential for supporting clinical decision-making, its current use is mostly limited to academic research, without applications in routine clinical practice. The workflow of radiomics is complex due to several methodological steps and nuances, which often leads to inadequate reporting and evaluation, and poor reproducibility. Available reporting guidelines and checklists for artificial intelligence and predictive modeling include relevant good practices, but they are not tailored to radiomic research. There is a clear need for a complete radiomics checklist for study planning, manuscript writing, and evaluation during the review process to facilitate the repeatability and reproducibility of studies. We here present a documentation standard for radiomic research that can guide authors and reviewers. Our motivation is to improve the quality and reliability and, in turn, the reproducibility of radiomic research. We name the checklist CLEAR (CheckList for EvaluAtion of Radiomics research), to convey the idea of being more transparent. With its 58 items, the CLEAR checklist should be considered a standardization tool providing the minimum requirements for presenting clinical radiomics research. In addition to a dynamic online version of the checklist, a public repository has also been set up to allow the radiomics community to comment on the checklist items and adapt the checklist for future versions. Prepared and revised by an international group of experts using a modified Delphi method, we hope the CLEAR checklist will serve well as a single and complete scientific documentation tool for authors and reviewers to improve the radiomics literature. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-023-01415-8. Springer Vienna 2023-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10160267/ /pubmed/37142815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01415-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Guideline Kocak, Burak Baessler, Bettina Bakas, Spyridon Cuocolo, Renato Fedorov, Andrey Maier-Hein, Lena Mercaldo, Nathaniel Müller, Henning Orlhac, Fanny Pinto dos Santos, Daniel Stanzione, Arnaldo Ugga, Lorenzo Zwanenburg, Alex CheckList for EvaluAtion of Radiomics research (CLEAR): a step-by-step reporting guideline for authors and reviewers endorsed by ESR and EuSoMII |
title | CheckList for EvaluAtion of Radiomics research (CLEAR): a step-by-step reporting guideline for authors and reviewers endorsed by ESR and EuSoMII |
title_full | CheckList for EvaluAtion of Radiomics research (CLEAR): a step-by-step reporting guideline for authors and reviewers endorsed by ESR and EuSoMII |
title_fullStr | CheckList for EvaluAtion of Radiomics research (CLEAR): a step-by-step reporting guideline for authors and reviewers endorsed by ESR and EuSoMII |
title_full_unstemmed | CheckList for EvaluAtion of Radiomics research (CLEAR): a step-by-step reporting guideline for authors and reviewers endorsed by ESR and EuSoMII |
title_short | CheckList for EvaluAtion of Radiomics research (CLEAR): a step-by-step reporting guideline for authors and reviewers endorsed by ESR and EuSoMII |
title_sort | checklist for evaluation of radiomics research (clear): a step-by-step reporting guideline for authors and reviewers endorsed by esr and eusomii |
topic | Guideline |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10160267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37142815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01415-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kocakburak checklistforevaluationofradiomicsresearchclearastepbystepreportingguidelineforauthorsandreviewersendorsedbyesrandeusomii AT baesslerbettina checklistforevaluationofradiomicsresearchclearastepbystepreportingguidelineforauthorsandreviewersendorsedbyesrandeusomii AT bakasspyridon checklistforevaluationofradiomicsresearchclearastepbystepreportingguidelineforauthorsandreviewersendorsedbyesrandeusomii AT cuocolorenato checklistforevaluationofradiomicsresearchclearastepbystepreportingguidelineforauthorsandreviewersendorsedbyesrandeusomii AT fedorovandrey checklistforevaluationofradiomicsresearchclearastepbystepreportingguidelineforauthorsandreviewersendorsedbyesrandeusomii AT maierheinlena checklistforevaluationofradiomicsresearchclearastepbystepreportingguidelineforauthorsandreviewersendorsedbyesrandeusomii AT mercaldonathaniel checklistforevaluationofradiomicsresearchclearastepbystepreportingguidelineforauthorsandreviewersendorsedbyesrandeusomii AT mullerhenning checklistforevaluationofradiomicsresearchclearastepbystepreportingguidelineforauthorsandreviewersendorsedbyesrandeusomii AT orlhacfanny checklistforevaluationofradiomicsresearchclearastepbystepreportingguidelineforauthorsandreviewersendorsedbyesrandeusomii AT pintodossantosdaniel checklistforevaluationofradiomicsresearchclearastepbystepreportingguidelineforauthorsandreviewersendorsedbyesrandeusomii AT stanzionearnaldo checklistforevaluationofradiomicsresearchclearastepbystepreportingguidelineforauthorsandreviewersendorsedbyesrandeusomii AT uggalorenzo checklistforevaluationofradiomicsresearchclearastepbystepreportingguidelineforauthorsandreviewersendorsedbyesrandeusomii AT zwanenburgalex checklistforevaluationofradiomicsresearchclearastepbystepreportingguidelineforauthorsandreviewersendorsedbyesrandeusomii |