Cargando…

Tourists’ valuation of nature in protected areas: A systematic review

In the face of biodiversity loss, it is crucial to broaden the arguments for conservation of protected areas by acknowledging diverse values of nature. We systematically reviewed empirical studies to investigate tourists’ values of nature in protected areas over time and across regions. To do so, we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gross, Milena, Pearson, Jasmine, Arbieu, Ugo, Riechers, Maraja, Thomsen, Simon, Martín-López, Berta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10160295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37071324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-023-01845-0
_version_ 1785037251060695040
author Gross, Milena
Pearson, Jasmine
Arbieu, Ugo
Riechers, Maraja
Thomsen, Simon
Martín-López, Berta
author_facet Gross, Milena
Pearson, Jasmine
Arbieu, Ugo
Riechers, Maraja
Thomsen, Simon
Martín-López, Berta
author_sort Gross, Milena
collection PubMed
description In the face of biodiversity loss, it is crucial to broaden the arguments for conservation of protected areas by acknowledging diverse values of nature. We systematically reviewed empirical studies to investigate tourists’ values of nature in protected areas over time and across regions. To do so, we explored (1) the main ecological and social characteristics of the case studies; (2) methodological approaches; and (3) value types. Based on the review of 152 articles, we found that economic valuation has received the most scientific attention, while socio-cultural valuation approaches have recently increased. Values were primarily elicited and analyzed quantitatively and in monetary metrics, although valuation methods and frameworks have diversified over the past two decades. However, considering the role of valuation methods and frameworks as value-articulating institutions, we suggest that future research on nature valuation also applies qualitative and non-monetary methods, elicits diverse values, and conducts plural valuation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13280-023-01845-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10160295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101602952023-05-06 Tourists’ valuation of nature in protected areas: A systematic review Gross, Milena Pearson, Jasmine Arbieu, Ugo Riechers, Maraja Thomsen, Simon Martín-López, Berta Ambio Review In the face of biodiversity loss, it is crucial to broaden the arguments for conservation of protected areas by acknowledging diverse values of nature. We systematically reviewed empirical studies to investigate tourists’ values of nature in protected areas over time and across regions. To do so, we explored (1) the main ecological and social characteristics of the case studies; (2) methodological approaches; and (3) value types. Based on the review of 152 articles, we found that economic valuation has received the most scientific attention, while socio-cultural valuation approaches have recently increased. Values were primarily elicited and analyzed quantitatively and in monetary metrics, although valuation methods and frameworks have diversified over the past two decades. However, considering the role of valuation methods and frameworks as value-articulating institutions, we suggest that future research on nature valuation also applies qualitative and non-monetary methods, elicits diverse values, and conducts plural valuation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13280-023-01845-0. Springer Netherlands 2023-04-18 2023-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10160295/ /pubmed/37071324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-023-01845-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Gross, Milena
Pearson, Jasmine
Arbieu, Ugo
Riechers, Maraja
Thomsen, Simon
Martín-López, Berta
Tourists’ valuation of nature in protected areas: A systematic review
title Tourists’ valuation of nature in protected areas: A systematic review
title_full Tourists’ valuation of nature in protected areas: A systematic review
title_fullStr Tourists’ valuation of nature in protected areas: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Tourists’ valuation of nature in protected areas: A systematic review
title_short Tourists’ valuation of nature in protected areas: A systematic review
title_sort tourists’ valuation of nature in protected areas: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10160295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37071324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-023-01845-0
work_keys_str_mv AT grossmilena touristsvaluationofnatureinprotectedareasasystematicreview
AT pearsonjasmine touristsvaluationofnatureinprotectedareasasystematicreview
AT arbieuugo touristsvaluationofnatureinprotectedareasasystematicreview
AT riechersmaraja touristsvaluationofnatureinprotectedareasasystematicreview
AT thomsensimon touristsvaluationofnatureinprotectedareasasystematicreview
AT martinlopezberta touristsvaluationofnatureinprotectedareasasystematicreview