Cargando…

Comparative transcriptome analysis of the mechanism difference in heat stress response between indica rice cultivar “IR64” and japonica cultivar “Koshihikari” at the seedling stage

Heat stress (HS) has become a major abiotic stress in rice, considering the frequency and intensity of extreme hot weather. There is an urgent need to explore the differences in molecular mechanisms of HS tolerance in different cultivars, especially in indica and japonica. In this study, we investig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yingfeng, Wang, Yubo, Chen, Wenjuan, Dong, Yating, Zhang, Guilian, Deng, Huabing, Liu, Xiong, Lu, Xuedan, Wang, Feng, Chen, Guihua, Xiao, Yunhua, Tang, Wenbang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10160441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37153001
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1135577
_version_ 1785037278986371072
author Wang, Yingfeng
Wang, Yubo
Chen, Wenjuan
Dong, Yating
Zhang, Guilian
Deng, Huabing
Liu, Xiong
Lu, Xuedan
Wang, Feng
Chen, Guihua
Xiao, Yunhua
Tang, Wenbang
author_facet Wang, Yingfeng
Wang, Yubo
Chen, Wenjuan
Dong, Yating
Zhang, Guilian
Deng, Huabing
Liu, Xiong
Lu, Xuedan
Wang, Feng
Chen, Guihua
Xiao, Yunhua
Tang, Wenbang
author_sort Wang, Yingfeng
collection PubMed
description Heat stress (HS) has become a major abiotic stress in rice, considering the frequency and intensity of extreme hot weather. There is an urgent need to explore the differences in molecular mechanisms of HS tolerance in different cultivars, especially in indica and japonica. In this study, we investigated the transcriptome information of IR64 (indica, IR) and Koshihikari (japonica, Kos) in response to HS at the seedling stage. From the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) consistently expressed at six time points, 599 DEGs were identified that were co-expressed in both cultivars, as well as 945 and 1,180 DEGs that were specifically expressed in IR and Kos, respectively. The results of GO and KEGG analysis showed two different HS response pathways for IR and Kos. IR specifically expressed DEGs were mainly enriched in chloroplast-related pathways, whereas Kos specifically expressed DEGs were mainly enriched in endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria-related pathways. Meanwhile, we highlighted the importance of NO biosynthesis genes, especially nitrate reductase genes, in the HS response of IR based on protein-protein interaction networks. In addition, we found that heat shock proteins and heat shock factors play very important roles in both cultivars. This study not only provides new insights into the differences in HS responses between different subspecies of rice, but also lays the foundation for future research on molecular mechanisms and breeding of heat-tolerant cultivars.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10160441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101604412023-05-06 Comparative transcriptome analysis of the mechanism difference in heat stress response between indica rice cultivar “IR64” and japonica cultivar “Koshihikari” at the seedling stage Wang, Yingfeng Wang, Yubo Chen, Wenjuan Dong, Yating Zhang, Guilian Deng, Huabing Liu, Xiong Lu, Xuedan Wang, Feng Chen, Guihua Xiao, Yunhua Tang, Wenbang Front Genet Genetics Heat stress (HS) has become a major abiotic stress in rice, considering the frequency and intensity of extreme hot weather. There is an urgent need to explore the differences in molecular mechanisms of HS tolerance in different cultivars, especially in indica and japonica. In this study, we investigated the transcriptome information of IR64 (indica, IR) and Koshihikari (japonica, Kos) in response to HS at the seedling stage. From the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) consistently expressed at six time points, 599 DEGs were identified that were co-expressed in both cultivars, as well as 945 and 1,180 DEGs that were specifically expressed in IR and Kos, respectively. The results of GO and KEGG analysis showed two different HS response pathways for IR and Kos. IR specifically expressed DEGs were mainly enriched in chloroplast-related pathways, whereas Kos specifically expressed DEGs were mainly enriched in endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria-related pathways. Meanwhile, we highlighted the importance of NO biosynthesis genes, especially nitrate reductase genes, in the HS response of IR based on protein-protein interaction networks. In addition, we found that heat shock proteins and heat shock factors play very important roles in both cultivars. This study not only provides new insights into the differences in HS responses between different subspecies of rice, but also lays the foundation for future research on molecular mechanisms and breeding of heat-tolerant cultivars. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10160441/ /pubmed/37153001 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1135577 Text en Copyright © 2023 Wang, Wang, Chen, Dong, Zhang, Deng, Liu, Lu, Wang, Chen, Xiao and Tang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Wang, Yingfeng
Wang, Yubo
Chen, Wenjuan
Dong, Yating
Zhang, Guilian
Deng, Huabing
Liu, Xiong
Lu, Xuedan
Wang, Feng
Chen, Guihua
Xiao, Yunhua
Tang, Wenbang
Comparative transcriptome analysis of the mechanism difference in heat stress response between indica rice cultivar “IR64” and japonica cultivar “Koshihikari” at the seedling stage
title Comparative transcriptome analysis of the mechanism difference in heat stress response between indica rice cultivar “IR64” and japonica cultivar “Koshihikari” at the seedling stage
title_full Comparative transcriptome analysis of the mechanism difference in heat stress response between indica rice cultivar “IR64” and japonica cultivar “Koshihikari” at the seedling stage
title_fullStr Comparative transcriptome analysis of the mechanism difference in heat stress response between indica rice cultivar “IR64” and japonica cultivar “Koshihikari” at the seedling stage
title_full_unstemmed Comparative transcriptome analysis of the mechanism difference in heat stress response between indica rice cultivar “IR64” and japonica cultivar “Koshihikari” at the seedling stage
title_short Comparative transcriptome analysis of the mechanism difference in heat stress response between indica rice cultivar “IR64” and japonica cultivar “Koshihikari” at the seedling stage
title_sort comparative transcriptome analysis of the mechanism difference in heat stress response between indica rice cultivar “ir64” and japonica cultivar “koshihikari” at the seedling stage
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10160441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37153001
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1135577
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyingfeng comparativetranscriptomeanalysisofthemechanismdifferenceinheatstressresponsebetweenindicaricecultivarir64andjaponicacultivarkoshihikariattheseedlingstage
AT wangyubo comparativetranscriptomeanalysisofthemechanismdifferenceinheatstressresponsebetweenindicaricecultivarir64andjaponicacultivarkoshihikariattheseedlingstage
AT chenwenjuan comparativetranscriptomeanalysisofthemechanismdifferenceinheatstressresponsebetweenindicaricecultivarir64andjaponicacultivarkoshihikariattheseedlingstage
AT dongyating comparativetranscriptomeanalysisofthemechanismdifferenceinheatstressresponsebetweenindicaricecultivarir64andjaponicacultivarkoshihikariattheseedlingstage
AT zhangguilian comparativetranscriptomeanalysisofthemechanismdifferenceinheatstressresponsebetweenindicaricecultivarir64andjaponicacultivarkoshihikariattheseedlingstage
AT denghuabing comparativetranscriptomeanalysisofthemechanismdifferenceinheatstressresponsebetweenindicaricecultivarir64andjaponicacultivarkoshihikariattheseedlingstage
AT liuxiong comparativetranscriptomeanalysisofthemechanismdifferenceinheatstressresponsebetweenindicaricecultivarir64andjaponicacultivarkoshihikariattheseedlingstage
AT luxuedan comparativetranscriptomeanalysisofthemechanismdifferenceinheatstressresponsebetweenindicaricecultivarir64andjaponicacultivarkoshihikariattheseedlingstage
AT wangfeng comparativetranscriptomeanalysisofthemechanismdifferenceinheatstressresponsebetweenindicaricecultivarir64andjaponicacultivarkoshihikariattheseedlingstage
AT chenguihua comparativetranscriptomeanalysisofthemechanismdifferenceinheatstressresponsebetweenindicaricecultivarir64andjaponicacultivarkoshihikariattheseedlingstage
AT xiaoyunhua comparativetranscriptomeanalysisofthemechanismdifferenceinheatstressresponsebetweenindicaricecultivarir64andjaponicacultivarkoshihikariattheseedlingstage
AT tangwenbang comparativetranscriptomeanalysisofthemechanismdifferenceinheatstressresponsebetweenindicaricecultivarir64andjaponicacultivarkoshihikariattheseedlingstage