Cargando…

Risk factors differ for viable and low viable crushed piglets in free farrowing pens

Newborn piglets have a high risk of being crushed by the sow, and this risk implies welfare and economic consequences. The aim of this study was to investigate the importance of differentiating between low viable (secondary crushing losses) and viable crushed (primary crushing losses) piglets for th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spörri-Vontobel, Cornelia, Simmler, Michael, Wechsler, Beat, Scriba, Madeleine F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10160680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37152692
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1172446
_version_ 1785037333816410112
author Spörri-Vontobel, Cornelia
Simmler, Michael
Wechsler, Beat
Scriba, Madeleine F.
author_facet Spörri-Vontobel, Cornelia
Simmler, Michael
Wechsler, Beat
Scriba, Madeleine F.
author_sort Spörri-Vontobel, Cornelia
collection PubMed
description Newborn piglets have a high risk of being crushed by the sow, and this risk implies welfare and economic consequences. The aim of this study was to investigate the importance of differentiating between low viable (secondary crushing losses) and viable crushed (primary crushing losses) piglets for the evaluation of risk factors for crushing related to characteristics of the sow, the litter, and the environment. Eleven Swiss farmers recorded sows’ production data (parity class, gestation length, numbers of live-born and stillborn piglets), data (age, sex, weight, cause of death, and signs of weakness) for every live-born piglet that died in the first week after birth (piglet loss), and ambient temperature. Piglet losses were assigned to five categorical events: piglet loss, subdivided into not crushed and crushed, the latter being further subdivided into low viable crushed and viable crushed. Piglets recorded by the farmer as crushed were assigned to the events low viable crushed and viable crushed based on the piglet’s body weight and signs of weakness (diseases, malformations). Data of 9,543 live-born piglets from 740 litters were eventually used to statistically model the hazard of dying at any given time in the first week after birth due to one of these events (mixed-effects Cox model). Five potential risk factors were analyzed as co-variates: parity class, gestation length, number of live-born piglets, number of stillborn piglets, and daily number of hours with ambient temperature >30°C. We identified two risk factors for dying from the event viable crushed that were not identified as risk factors for low viable crushed, namely shorter gestation length and higher daily number of hours with ambient temperature  > 30°C. Vice-versa, we identified additional live-born piglets in the litter as risk factor for low viable crushed, but not for viable crushed. Our results show the importance of differentiating between low viable and viable crushed piglets for the interpretation of risk factors for crushing losses. Therefore, we suggest that for breeding purposes and in research, this differentiation should be made.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10160680
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101606802023-05-06 Risk factors differ for viable and low viable crushed piglets in free farrowing pens Spörri-Vontobel, Cornelia Simmler, Michael Wechsler, Beat Scriba, Madeleine F. Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Newborn piglets have a high risk of being crushed by the sow, and this risk implies welfare and economic consequences. The aim of this study was to investigate the importance of differentiating between low viable (secondary crushing losses) and viable crushed (primary crushing losses) piglets for the evaluation of risk factors for crushing related to characteristics of the sow, the litter, and the environment. Eleven Swiss farmers recorded sows’ production data (parity class, gestation length, numbers of live-born and stillborn piglets), data (age, sex, weight, cause of death, and signs of weakness) for every live-born piglet that died in the first week after birth (piglet loss), and ambient temperature. Piglet losses were assigned to five categorical events: piglet loss, subdivided into not crushed and crushed, the latter being further subdivided into low viable crushed and viable crushed. Piglets recorded by the farmer as crushed were assigned to the events low viable crushed and viable crushed based on the piglet’s body weight and signs of weakness (diseases, malformations). Data of 9,543 live-born piglets from 740 litters were eventually used to statistically model the hazard of dying at any given time in the first week after birth due to one of these events (mixed-effects Cox model). Five potential risk factors were analyzed as co-variates: parity class, gestation length, number of live-born piglets, number of stillborn piglets, and daily number of hours with ambient temperature >30°C. We identified two risk factors for dying from the event viable crushed that were not identified as risk factors for low viable crushed, namely shorter gestation length and higher daily number of hours with ambient temperature  > 30°C. Vice-versa, we identified additional live-born piglets in the litter as risk factor for low viable crushed, but not for viable crushed. Our results show the importance of differentiating between low viable and viable crushed piglets for the interpretation of risk factors for crushing losses. Therefore, we suggest that for breeding purposes and in research, this differentiation should be made. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10160680/ /pubmed/37152692 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1172446 Text en Copyright © 2023 Spörri-Vontobel, Simmler, Wechsler and Scriba. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Spörri-Vontobel, Cornelia
Simmler, Michael
Wechsler, Beat
Scriba, Madeleine F.
Risk factors differ for viable and low viable crushed piglets in free farrowing pens
title Risk factors differ for viable and low viable crushed piglets in free farrowing pens
title_full Risk factors differ for viable and low viable crushed piglets in free farrowing pens
title_fullStr Risk factors differ for viable and low viable crushed piglets in free farrowing pens
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors differ for viable and low viable crushed piglets in free farrowing pens
title_short Risk factors differ for viable and low viable crushed piglets in free farrowing pens
title_sort risk factors differ for viable and low viable crushed piglets in free farrowing pens
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10160680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37152692
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1172446
work_keys_str_mv AT sporrivontobelcornelia riskfactorsdifferforviableandlowviablecrushedpigletsinfreefarrowingpens
AT simmlermichael riskfactorsdifferforviableandlowviablecrushedpigletsinfreefarrowingpens
AT wechslerbeat riskfactorsdifferforviableandlowviablecrushedpigletsinfreefarrowingpens
AT scribamadeleinef riskfactorsdifferforviableandlowviablecrushedpigletsinfreefarrowingpens