Cargando…
Distribution of capitalized benefits from land conservation
Land conservation efforts throughout the United States sustain ecological benefits while generating wealth in the housing market through capitalization of amenities. This paper estimates the benefits of conservation that are capitalized into proximate home values and quantifies how those benefits ar...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10160954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37094159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2215262120 |
_version_ | 1785037388039323648 |
---|---|
author | Lang, Corey VanCeylon, Jarron Ando, Amy W. |
author_facet | Lang, Corey VanCeylon, Jarron Ando, Amy W. |
author_sort | Lang, Corey |
collection | PubMed |
description | Land conservation efforts throughout the United States sustain ecological benefits while generating wealth in the housing market through capitalization of amenities. This paper estimates the benefits of conservation that are capitalized into proximate home values and quantifies how those benefits are distributed across demographic groups. Using detailed property and household-level data from Massachusetts, we estimate that new land conservation led to $62 million in new housing wealth equity. However, houses owned by low-income or Black or Hispanic households are less likely to be located near protected areas, and hence, these populations are less likely to benefit financially. Direct study of the distribution of this new wealth from capitalized conservation is highly unequal, with the richest quartile of households receiving 43%, White households receiving 91%, and the richest White households receiving 40%, which is nearly 140% more than would be expected under equal distribution. We extend our analysis using census data for the entire United States and observe parallel patterns. We estimate that recent land conservation generated $9.8 billion in wealth through the housing market and that wealthier and White households benefited disproportionately. These findings suggest regressive and racially disparate incidence of the wealth benefits of land conservation policy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10160954 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | National Academy of Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101609542023-05-06 Distribution of capitalized benefits from land conservation Lang, Corey VanCeylon, Jarron Ando, Amy W. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Social Sciences Land conservation efforts throughout the United States sustain ecological benefits while generating wealth in the housing market through capitalization of amenities. This paper estimates the benefits of conservation that are capitalized into proximate home values and quantifies how those benefits are distributed across demographic groups. Using detailed property and household-level data from Massachusetts, we estimate that new land conservation led to $62 million in new housing wealth equity. However, houses owned by low-income or Black or Hispanic households are less likely to be located near protected areas, and hence, these populations are less likely to benefit financially. Direct study of the distribution of this new wealth from capitalized conservation is highly unequal, with the richest quartile of households receiving 43%, White households receiving 91%, and the richest White households receiving 40%, which is nearly 140% more than would be expected under equal distribution. We extend our analysis using census data for the entire United States and observe parallel patterns. We estimate that recent land conservation generated $9.8 billion in wealth through the housing market and that wealthier and White households benefited disproportionately. These findings suggest regressive and racially disparate incidence of the wealth benefits of land conservation policy. National Academy of Sciences 2023-04-24 2023-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10160954/ /pubmed/37094159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2215262120 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Social Sciences Lang, Corey VanCeylon, Jarron Ando, Amy W. Distribution of capitalized benefits from land conservation |
title | Distribution of capitalized benefits from land conservation |
title_full | Distribution of capitalized benefits from land conservation |
title_fullStr | Distribution of capitalized benefits from land conservation |
title_full_unstemmed | Distribution of capitalized benefits from land conservation |
title_short | Distribution of capitalized benefits from land conservation |
title_sort | distribution of capitalized benefits from land conservation |
topic | Social Sciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10160954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37094159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2215262120 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT langcorey distributionofcapitalizedbenefitsfromlandconservation AT vanceylonjarron distributionofcapitalizedbenefitsfromlandconservation AT andoamyw distributionofcapitalizedbenefitsfromlandconservation |