Cargando…

Distribution of capitalized benefits from land conservation

Land conservation efforts throughout the United States sustain ecological benefits while generating wealth in the housing market through capitalization of amenities. This paper estimates the benefits of conservation that are capitalized into proximate home values and quantifies how those benefits ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lang, Corey, VanCeylon, Jarron, Ando, Amy W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10160954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37094159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2215262120
_version_ 1785037388039323648
author Lang, Corey
VanCeylon, Jarron
Ando, Amy W.
author_facet Lang, Corey
VanCeylon, Jarron
Ando, Amy W.
author_sort Lang, Corey
collection PubMed
description Land conservation efforts throughout the United States sustain ecological benefits while generating wealth in the housing market through capitalization of amenities. This paper estimates the benefits of conservation that are capitalized into proximate home values and quantifies how those benefits are distributed across demographic groups. Using detailed property and household-level data from Massachusetts, we estimate that new land conservation led to $62 million in new housing wealth equity. However, houses owned by low-income or Black or Hispanic households are less likely to be located near protected areas, and hence, these populations are less likely to benefit financially. Direct study of the distribution of this new wealth from capitalized conservation is highly unequal, with the richest quartile of households receiving 43%, White households receiving 91%, and the richest White households receiving 40%, which is nearly 140% more than would be expected under equal distribution. We extend our analysis using census data for the entire United States and observe parallel patterns. We estimate that recent land conservation generated $9.8 billion in wealth through the housing market and that wealthier and White households benefited disproportionately. These findings suggest regressive and racially disparate incidence of the wealth benefits of land conservation policy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10160954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101609542023-05-06 Distribution of capitalized benefits from land conservation Lang, Corey VanCeylon, Jarron Ando, Amy W. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Social Sciences Land conservation efforts throughout the United States sustain ecological benefits while generating wealth in the housing market through capitalization of amenities. This paper estimates the benefits of conservation that are capitalized into proximate home values and quantifies how those benefits are distributed across demographic groups. Using detailed property and household-level data from Massachusetts, we estimate that new land conservation led to $62 million in new housing wealth equity. However, houses owned by low-income or Black or Hispanic households are less likely to be located near protected areas, and hence, these populations are less likely to benefit financially. Direct study of the distribution of this new wealth from capitalized conservation is highly unequal, with the richest quartile of households receiving 43%, White households receiving 91%, and the richest White households receiving 40%, which is nearly 140% more than would be expected under equal distribution. We extend our analysis using census data for the entire United States and observe parallel patterns. We estimate that recent land conservation generated $9.8 billion in wealth through the housing market and that wealthier and White households benefited disproportionately. These findings suggest regressive and racially disparate incidence of the wealth benefits of land conservation policy. National Academy of Sciences 2023-04-24 2023-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10160954/ /pubmed/37094159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2215262120 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Social Sciences
Lang, Corey
VanCeylon, Jarron
Ando, Amy W.
Distribution of capitalized benefits from land conservation
title Distribution of capitalized benefits from land conservation
title_full Distribution of capitalized benefits from land conservation
title_fullStr Distribution of capitalized benefits from land conservation
title_full_unstemmed Distribution of capitalized benefits from land conservation
title_short Distribution of capitalized benefits from land conservation
title_sort distribution of capitalized benefits from land conservation
topic Social Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10160954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37094159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2215262120
work_keys_str_mv AT langcorey distributionofcapitalizedbenefitsfromlandconservation
AT vanceylonjarron distributionofcapitalizedbenefitsfromlandconservation
AT andoamyw distributionofcapitalizedbenefitsfromlandconservation