Cargando…

Determination of lower radiation dose limit for automatic measurement of adipose tissue

The purpose of this study was to determine the lower limit of radiation dose required to measure visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) volumes when a fat quantification and noise reduction techniques (NRTs) are combined. For this purpose, we utilized CT colonography (CT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grainger, Andrew T., Hasegawa, Akira, Krishnaraj, Arun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37025080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13958
_version_ 1785037405544251392
author Grainger, Andrew T.
Hasegawa, Akira
Krishnaraj, Arun
author_facet Grainger, Andrew T.
Hasegawa, Akira
Krishnaraj, Arun
author_sort Grainger, Andrew T.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to determine the lower limit of radiation dose required to measure visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) volumes when a fat quantification and noise reduction techniques (NRTs) are combined. For this purpose, we utilized CT colonography (CTC) images taken at low doses and manually segmented VAT and SAT fat volumes as ground truth. In order to derive the acceptable precision of the measurements needed to estimate the lower limit of radiation dose, we estimated the effect of different positioning during CT scanning on fat measurements using manually segmented VAT and SAT against normal dose. As a result, the acceptable accuracy of SAT and VAT was found to be 94.5% and 85.2%, respectively. Using these thresholds, the lower radiation dose limit required to accurately measure SAT using 5.25‐mm slice‐thick images was 1.5 mGy of size‐specific dose estimates (SSDE), while the lower radiation dose limit required to accurately measure VAT was 0.4 mGy of SSDE. The lower dose limit for SAT and VAT combined was 1.5 mGy, which was equivalent to an estimated effective dose of 0.38 mSv. Alternatively, without noise reduction, SAT could not achieve acceptable accuracy even for images with a slice thickness of 5.25 mm, while VAT required noise reduction for images with a slice thickness of 1.25 mm, but could achieve acceptable accuracy without noise reduction for images with a slice thickness of 5.25 mm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10161034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101610342023-05-06 Determination of lower radiation dose limit for automatic measurement of adipose tissue Grainger, Andrew T. Hasegawa, Akira Krishnaraj, Arun J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging The purpose of this study was to determine the lower limit of radiation dose required to measure visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) volumes when a fat quantification and noise reduction techniques (NRTs) are combined. For this purpose, we utilized CT colonography (CTC) images taken at low doses and manually segmented VAT and SAT fat volumes as ground truth. In order to derive the acceptable precision of the measurements needed to estimate the lower limit of radiation dose, we estimated the effect of different positioning during CT scanning on fat measurements using manually segmented VAT and SAT against normal dose. As a result, the acceptable accuracy of SAT and VAT was found to be 94.5% and 85.2%, respectively. Using these thresholds, the lower radiation dose limit required to accurately measure SAT using 5.25‐mm slice‐thick images was 1.5 mGy of size‐specific dose estimates (SSDE), while the lower radiation dose limit required to accurately measure VAT was 0.4 mGy of SSDE. The lower dose limit for SAT and VAT combined was 1.5 mGy, which was equivalent to an estimated effective dose of 0.38 mSv. Alternatively, without noise reduction, SAT could not achieve acceptable accuracy even for images with a slice thickness of 5.25 mm, while VAT required noise reduction for images with a slice thickness of 1.25 mm, but could achieve acceptable accuracy without noise reduction for images with a slice thickness of 5.25 mm. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10161034/ /pubmed/37025080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13958 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Grainger, Andrew T.
Hasegawa, Akira
Krishnaraj, Arun
Determination of lower radiation dose limit for automatic measurement of adipose tissue
title Determination of lower radiation dose limit for automatic measurement of adipose tissue
title_full Determination of lower radiation dose limit for automatic measurement of adipose tissue
title_fullStr Determination of lower radiation dose limit for automatic measurement of adipose tissue
title_full_unstemmed Determination of lower radiation dose limit for automatic measurement of adipose tissue
title_short Determination of lower radiation dose limit for automatic measurement of adipose tissue
title_sort determination of lower radiation dose limit for automatic measurement of adipose tissue
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37025080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13958
work_keys_str_mv AT graingerandrewt determinationoflowerradiationdoselimitforautomaticmeasurementofadiposetissue
AT hasegawaakira determinationoflowerradiationdoselimitforautomaticmeasurementofadiposetissue
AT krishnarajarun determinationoflowerradiationdoselimitforautomaticmeasurementofadiposetissue