Cargando…

Total skin electron therapy vertical profiles measured using radiochromic film

BACKGROUND: Vertical dose profiles of Total Skin Electron Therapy (TSET) electron fields are often measured using ionization chambers (ICs); however, resulting protocols are tedious and time consuming due to complex gantry arrangements, numerous point dose measurements and extra–cameral corrections....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cappelletto, Nicole I. C., Shim, Martin G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36812051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13941
_version_ 1785037414791643136
author Cappelletto, Nicole I. C.
Shim, Martin G.
author_facet Cappelletto, Nicole I. C.
Shim, Martin G.
author_sort Cappelletto, Nicole I. C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vertical dose profiles of Total Skin Electron Therapy (TSET) electron fields are often measured using ionization chambers (ICs); however, resulting protocols are tedious and time consuming due to complex gantry arrangements, numerous point dose measurements and extra–cameral corrections. This inefficiency is reduced when using radiochromic film (RCF) dosimetry through simultaneous dose sampling and the elimination of IC‐related measurement corrections. PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of RCF dosimetry for TSET vertical profile measurements and establish a novel RCF based vertical profile quality assurance protocol. METHODS: Thirty‐one vertical profiles were measured using GAFChromic(®) EBT‐XD RCF on two matched linear accelerators (linacs) over 1.5 years. Absolute dose was quantified using a triple channel calibration method. Two IC profiles were collected for comparison to RCF profiles. Twenty‐one archived IC measured profiles from two different matched linacs from 2006 to 2011 were analyzed. Inter‐ and intra‐profile dose variability was compared between dosimeters. The time required for the RCF and IC protocols was compared. RESULTS: RCF measured inter‐profile variability ranged from 0.66%–5.16% and 1.30%–3.86% for the two linacs. A 0.2%–5.4% inter‐profile variability was observed for archived IC measured profiles. RCF measured intra‐profile variability ranged from 10.0%–15.8%; six of 31 profiles exceeded the EORTC ± 10% limit. Archived IC measured profiles exhibited lower intra‐profile variability (4.5%–10.4%). RCF and IC measured profiles agreed in the center of the field; however, RCF doses measured 170–179 cm above the TSET treatment box base were ∼7% greater. Modification to the RCF phantom eliminated this discrepancy, resulting in comparable intra‐profile variability and agreeance with the ±10% limit. Measurement times were reduced from 3 h (IC protocol) to 30 min (RCF protocol). CONCLUSIONS: RCF dosimetry improves protocol efficiency. RCF has been established as a valuable dosimeter for TSET vertical profile quantification when compared to ICs as the gold standard.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10161074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101610742023-05-06 Total skin electron therapy vertical profiles measured using radiochromic film Cappelletto, Nicole I. C. Shim, Martin G. J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes BACKGROUND: Vertical dose profiles of Total Skin Electron Therapy (TSET) electron fields are often measured using ionization chambers (ICs); however, resulting protocols are tedious and time consuming due to complex gantry arrangements, numerous point dose measurements and extra–cameral corrections. This inefficiency is reduced when using radiochromic film (RCF) dosimetry through simultaneous dose sampling and the elimination of IC‐related measurement corrections. PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of RCF dosimetry for TSET vertical profile measurements and establish a novel RCF based vertical profile quality assurance protocol. METHODS: Thirty‐one vertical profiles were measured using GAFChromic(®) EBT‐XD RCF on two matched linear accelerators (linacs) over 1.5 years. Absolute dose was quantified using a triple channel calibration method. Two IC profiles were collected for comparison to RCF profiles. Twenty‐one archived IC measured profiles from two different matched linacs from 2006 to 2011 were analyzed. Inter‐ and intra‐profile dose variability was compared between dosimeters. The time required for the RCF and IC protocols was compared. RESULTS: RCF measured inter‐profile variability ranged from 0.66%–5.16% and 1.30%–3.86% for the two linacs. A 0.2%–5.4% inter‐profile variability was observed for archived IC measured profiles. RCF measured intra‐profile variability ranged from 10.0%–15.8%; six of 31 profiles exceeded the EORTC ± 10% limit. Archived IC measured profiles exhibited lower intra‐profile variability (4.5%–10.4%). RCF and IC measured profiles agreed in the center of the field; however, RCF doses measured 170–179 cm above the TSET treatment box base were ∼7% greater. Modification to the RCF phantom eliminated this discrepancy, resulting in comparable intra‐profile variability and agreeance with the ±10% limit. Measurement times were reduced from 3 h (IC protocol) to 30 min (RCF protocol). CONCLUSIONS: RCF dosimetry improves protocol efficiency. RCF has been established as a valuable dosimeter for TSET vertical profile quantification when compared to ICs as the gold standard. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10161074/ /pubmed/36812051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13941 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Cappelletto, Nicole I. C.
Shim, Martin G.
Total skin electron therapy vertical profiles measured using radiochromic film
title Total skin electron therapy vertical profiles measured using radiochromic film
title_full Total skin electron therapy vertical profiles measured using radiochromic film
title_fullStr Total skin electron therapy vertical profiles measured using radiochromic film
title_full_unstemmed Total skin electron therapy vertical profiles measured using radiochromic film
title_short Total skin electron therapy vertical profiles measured using radiochromic film
title_sort total skin electron therapy vertical profiles measured using radiochromic film
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36812051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13941
work_keys_str_mv AT cappellettonicoleic totalskinelectrontherapyverticalprofilesmeasuredusingradiochromicfilm
AT shimmarting totalskinelectrontherapyverticalprofilesmeasuredusingradiochromicfilm