Cargando…
Spot delivery error predictions for intensity modulated proton therapy using robustness analysis with machine learning
The purpose of this work is to assess the robustness of treatment plans when spot delivery errors were predicted with a machine learning (ML) model for intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Over 6000 machine log files from delivered IMPT treatment plans were included in this study. From these l...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36748663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13911 |
_version_ | 1785037425434689536 |
---|---|
author | Newpower, Mark A. Chiang, Bing‐Hao Ahmad, Salahuddin Chen, Yong |
author_facet | Newpower, Mark A. Chiang, Bing‐Hao Ahmad, Salahuddin Chen, Yong |
author_sort | Newpower, Mark A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this work is to assess the robustness of treatment plans when spot delivery errors were predicted with a machine learning (ML) model for intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Over 6000 machine log files from delivered IMPT treatment plans were included in this study. From these log files, over 4.1 [Formula: see text] 10(6) delivered proton spots were used to train the ML model. The presented model was tested and used to predict the spot position as well as the monitor units (MU) per spot, based on the original planning parameters. Two patient plans (one accelerated partial breast irradiation [APBI] and one ependymoma) were recalculated with the predicted spot position/MUs by the ML model and then were re‐analyzed for robustness. Plans with ML predicted spots were less robust than the original clinical plans. In the APBI plan, dosimetric changes to the left lung and heart were not clinically relevant. In the ependymoma plan, the hot spot in the brainstem decreased and the hot spot in the cervical cord increased. Despite these differences, after robustness analysis, both ML spot delivery error plans resulted in >95% of the CTV receiving >95% of the prescription dose. The presented workflow has the potential benefit of including realistic spots information for plan quality checks in IMPT. This work demonstrates that in the two example plans, the plans were still robust when accounting for spot delivery errors as predicted by the ML model. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10161119 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101611192023-05-06 Spot delivery error predictions for intensity modulated proton therapy using robustness analysis with machine learning Newpower, Mark A. Chiang, Bing‐Hao Ahmad, Salahuddin Chen, Yong J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The purpose of this work is to assess the robustness of treatment plans when spot delivery errors were predicted with a machine learning (ML) model for intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Over 6000 machine log files from delivered IMPT treatment plans were included in this study. From these log files, over 4.1 [Formula: see text] 10(6) delivered proton spots were used to train the ML model. The presented model was tested and used to predict the spot position as well as the monitor units (MU) per spot, based on the original planning parameters. Two patient plans (one accelerated partial breast irradiation [APBI] and one ependymoma) were recalculated with the predicted spot position/MUs by the ML model and then were re‐analyzed for robustness. Plans with ML predicted spots were less robust than the original clinical plans. In the APBI plan, dosimetric changes to the left lung and heart were not clinically relevant. In the ependymoma plan, the hot spot in the brainstem decreased and the hot spot in the cervical cord increased. Despite these differences, after robustness analysis, both ML spot delivery error plans resulted in >95% of the CTV receiving >95% of the prescription dose. The presented workflow has the potential benefit of including realistic spots information for plan quality checks in IMPT. This work demonstrates that in the two example plans, the plans were still robust when accounting for spot delivery errors as predicted by the ML model. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10161119/ /pubmed/36748663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13911 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Newpower, Mark A. Chiang, Bing‐Hao Ahmad, Salahuddin Chen, Yong Spot delivery error predictions for intensity modulated proton therapy using robustness analysis with machine learning |
title | Spot delivery error predictions for intensity modulated proton therapy using robustness analysis with machine learning |
title_full | Spot delivery error predictions for intensity modulated proton therapy using robustness analysis with machine learning |
title_fullStr | Spot delivery error predictions for intensity modulated proton therapy using robustness analysis with machine learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Spot delivery error predictions for intensity modulated proton therapy using robustness analysis with machine learning |
title_short | Spot delivery error predictions for intensity modulated proton therapy using robustness analysis with machine learning |
title_sort | spot delivery error predictions for intensity modulated proton therapy using robustness analysis with machine learning |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36748663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13911 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT newpowermarka spotdeliveryerrorpredictionsforintensitymodulatedprotontherapyusingrobustnessanalysiswithmachinelearning AT chiangbinghao spotdeliveryerrorpredictionsforintensitymodulatedprotontherapyusingrobustnessanalysiswithmachinelearning AT ahmadsalahuddin spotdeliveryerrorpredictionsforintensitymodulatedprotontherapyusingrobustnessanalysiswithmachinelearning AT chenyong spotdeliveryerrorpredictionsforintensitymodulatedprotontherapyusingrobustnessanalysiswithmachinelearning |