Cargando…
A systematic literature review of indicators measuring food security
Measurement is critical for assessing and monitoring food security. Yet, it is difficult to comprehend which food security dimensions, components, and levels the numerous available indicators reflect. We thus conducted a systematic literature review to analyse the scientific evidence on these indica...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37193360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40066-023-00415-7 |
_version_ | 1785037435495776256 |
---|---|
author | Manikas, Ioannis Ali, Beshir M. Sundarakani, Balan |
author_facet | Manikas, Ioannis Ali, Beshir M. Sundarakani, Balan |
author_sort | Manikas, Ioannis |
collection | PubMed |
description | Measurement is critical for assessing and monitoring food security. Yet, it is difficult to comprehend which food security dimensions, components, and levels the numerous available indicators reflect. We thus conducted a systematic literature review to analyse the scientific evidence on these indicators to comprehend the food security dimensions and components covered, intended purpose, level of analysis, data requirements, and recent developments and concepts applied in food security measurement. Data analysis of 78 articles shows that the household-level calorie adequacy indicator is the most frequently used (22%) as a sole measure of food security. The dietary diversity-based (44%) and experience-based (40%) indicators also find frequent use. The food utilisation (13%) and stability (18%) dimensions were seldom captured when measuring food security, and only three of the retrieved publications measured food security by considering all the four food security dimensions. The majority of the studies that applied calorie adequacy and dietary diversity-based indicators employed secondary data whereas most of the studies that applied experience-based indicators employed primary data, suggesting the convenience of collecting data for experience-based indicators than dietary-based indicators. We confirm that the estimation of complementary food security indicators consistently over time can help capture the different food security dimensions and components, and experience-based indicators are more suitable for rapid food security assessments. We suggest practitioners to integrate food consumption and anthropometry data in regular household living standard surveys for more comprehensive food security analysis. The results of this study can be used by food security stakeholders such as governments, practitioners and academics for briefs, teaching, as well as policy-related interventions and evaluations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40066-023-00415-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10161169 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101611692023-05-09 A systematic literature review of indicators measuring food security Manikas, Ioannis Ali, Beshir M. Sundarakani, Balan Agric Food Secur Review Measurement is critical for assessing and monitoring food security. Yet, it is difficult to comprehend which food security dimensions, components, and levels the numerous available indicators reflect. We thus conducted a systematic literature review to analyse the scientific evidence on these indicators to comprehend the food security dimensions and components covered, intended purpose, level of analysis, data requirements, and recent developments and concepts applied in food security measurement. Data analysis of 78 articles shows that the household-level calorie adequacy indicator is the most frequently used (22%) as a sole measure of food security. The dietary diversity-based (44%) and experience-based (40%) indicators also find frequent use. The food utilisation (13%) and stability (18%) dimensions were seldom captured when measuring food security, and only three of the retrieved publications measured food security by considering all the four food security dimensions. The majority of the studies that applied calorie adequacy and dietary diversity-based indicators employed secondary data whereas most of the studies that applied experience-based indicators employed primary data, suggesting the convenience of collecting data for experience-based indicators than dietary-based indicators. We confirm that the estimation of complementary food security indicators consistently over time can help capture the different food security dimensions and components, and experience-based indicators are more suitable for rapid food security assessments. We suggest practitioners to integrate food consumption and anthropometry data in regular household living standard surveys for more comprehensive food security analysis. The results of this study can be used by food security stakeholders such as governments, practitioners and academics for briefs, teaching, as well as policy-related interventions and evaluations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40066-023-00415-7. BioMed Central 2023-05-05 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10161169/ /pubmed/37193360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40066-023-00415-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Manikas, Ioannis Ali, Beshir M. Sundarakani, Balan A systematic literature review of indicators measuring food security |
title | A systematic literature review of indicators measuring food security |
title_full | A systematic literature review of indicators measuring food security |
title_fullStr | A systematic literature review of indicators measuring food security |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic literature review of indicators measuring food security |
title_short | A systematic literature review of indicators measuring food security |
title_sort | systematic literature review of indicators measuring food security |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37193360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40066-023-00415-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT manikasioannis asystematicliteraturereviewofindicatorsmeasuringfoodsecurity AT alibeshirm asystematicliteraturereviewofindicatorsmeasuringfoodsecurity AT sundarakanibalan asystematicliteraturereviewofindicatorsmeasuringfoodsecurity AT manikasioannis systematicliteraturereviewofindicatorsmeasuringfoodsecurity AT alibeshirm systematicliteraturereviewofindicatorsmeasuringfoodsecurity AT sundarakanibalan systematicliteraturereviewofindicatorsmeasuringfoodsecurity |