Cargando…

A systematic literature review of indicators measuring food security

Measurement is critical for assessing and monitoring food security. Yet, it is difficult to comprehend which food security dimensions, components, and levels the numerous available indicators reflect. We thus conducted a systematic literature review to analyse the scientific evidence on these indica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manikas, Ioannis, Ali, Beshir M., Sundarakani, Balan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37193360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40066-023-00415-7
_version_ 1785037435495776256
author Manikas, Ioannis
Ali, Beshir M.
Sundarakani, Balan
author_facet Manikas, Ioannis
Ali, Beshir M.
Sundarakani, Balan
author_sort Manikas, Ioannis
collection PubMed
description Measurement is critical for assessing and monitoring food security. Yet, it is difficult to comprehend which food security dimensions, components, and levels the numerous available indicators reflect. We thus conducted a systematic literature review to analyse the scientific evidence on these indicators to comprehend the food security dimensions and components covered, intended purpose, level of analysis, data requirements, and recent developments and concepts applied in food security measurement. Data analysis of 78 articles shows that the household-level calorie adequacy indicator is the most frequently used (22%) as a sole measure of food security. The dietary diversity-based (44%) and experience-based (40%) indicators also find frequent use. The food utilisation (13%) and stability (18%) dimensions were seldom captured when measuring food security, and only three of the retrieved publications measured food security by considering all the four food security dimensions. The majority of the studies that applied calorie adequacy and dietary diversity-based indicators employed secondary data whereas most of the studies that applied experience-based indicators employed primary data, suggesting the convenience of collecting data for experience-based indicators than dietary-based indicators. We confirm that the estimation of complementary food security indicators consistently over time can help capture the different food security dimensions and components, and experience-based indicators are more suitable for rapid food security assessments. We suggest practitioners to integrate food consumption and anthropometry data in regular household living standard surveys for more comprehensive food security analysis. The results of this study can be used by food security stakeholders such as governments, practitioners and academics for briefs, teaching, as well as policy-related interventions and evaluations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40066-023-00415-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10161169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101611692023-05-09 A systematic literature review of indicators measuring food security Manikas, Ioannis Ali, Beshir M. Sundarakani, Balan Agric Food Secur Review Measurement is critical for assessing and monitoring food security. Yet, it is difficult to comprehend which food security dimensions, components, and levels the numerous available indicators reflect. We thus conducted a systematic literature review to analyse the scientific evidence on these indicators to comprehend the food security dimensions and components covered, intended purpose, level of analysis, data requirements, and recent developments and concepts applied in food security measurement. Data analysis of 78 articles shows that the household-level calorie adequacy indicator is the most frequently used (22%) as a sole measure of food security. The dietary diversity-based (44%) and experience-based (40%) indicators also find frequent use. The food utilisation (13%) and stability (18%) dimensions were seldom captured when measuring food security, and only three of the retrieved publications measured food security by considering all the four food security dimensions. The majority of the studies that applied calorie adequacy and dietary diversity-based indicators employed secondary data whereas most of the studies that applied experience-based indicators employed primary data, suggesting the convenience of collecting data for experience-based indicators than dietary-based indicators. We confirm that the estimation of complementary food security indicators consistently over time can help capture the different food security dimensions and components, and experience-based indicators are more suitable for rapid food security assessments. We suggest practitioners to integrate food consumption and anthropometry data in regular household living standard surveys for more comprehensive food security analysis. The results of this study can be used by food security stakeholders such as governments, practitioners and academics for briefs, teaching, as well as policy-related interventions and evaluations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40066-023-00415-7. BioMed Central 2023-05-05 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10161169/ /pubmed/37193360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40066-023-00415-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Manikas, Ioannis
Ali, Beshir M.
Sundarakani, Balan
A systematic literature review of indicators measuring food security
title A systematic literature review of indicators measuring food security
title_full A systematic literature review of indicators measuring food security
title_fullStr A systematic literature review of indicators measuring food security
title_full_unstemmed A systematic literature review of indicators measuring food security
title_short A systematic literature review of indicators measuring food security
title_sort systematic literature review of indicators measuring food security
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37193360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40066-023-00415-7
work_keys_str_mv AT manikasioannis asystematicliteraturereviewofindicatorsmeasuringfoodsecurity
AT alibeshirm asystematicliteraturereviewofindicatorsmeasuringfoodsecurity
AT sundarakanibalan asystematicliteraturereviewofindicatorsmeasuringfoodsecurity
AT manikasioannis systematicliteraturereviewofindicatorsmeasuringfoodsecurity
AT alibeshirm systematicliteraturereviewofindicatorsmeasuringfoodsecurity
AT sundarakanibalan systematicliteraturereviewofindicatorsmeasuringfoodsecurity