Cargando…
Within-Mice Comparison of Microdialysis and Fiber Photometry-Recorded Dopamine Biosensor during Amphetamine Response
[Image: see text] A fundamental concept in neuroscience is the transmission of information between neurons via neurotransmitters, -modulators, and -peptides. For the past decades, the gold standard for measuring neurochemicals in awake animals has been microdialysis (MD). The emergence of geneticall...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37043174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.2c00817 |
_version_ | 1785037448232828928 |
---|---|
author | Ejdrup, Aske L. Wellbourne-Wood, Joel Dreyer, Jakob K. Guldhammer, Nina Lycas, Matthew D. Gether, Ulrik Hall, Benjamin J. Sørensen, Gunnar |
author_facet | Ejdrup, Aske L. Wellbourne-Wood, Joel Dreyer, Jakob K. Guldhammer, Nina Lycas, Matthew D. Gether, Ulrik Hall, Benjamin J. Sørensen, Gunnar |
author_sort | Ejdrup, Aske L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] A fundamental concept in neuroscience is the transmission of information between neurons via neurotransmitters, -modulators, and -peptides. For the past decades, the gold standard for measuring neurochemicals in awake animals has been microdialysis (MD). The emergence of genetically encoded fluorescence-based biosensors, as well as in vivo optical techniques such as fiber photometry (FP), has introduced technologically distinct means of measuring neurotransmission. To directly compare MD and FP, we performed concurrent within-animal recordings of extracellular dopamine (DA) in the dorsal striatum (DS) before and after administration of amphetamine in awake, freely behaving mice expressing the dopamine sensor dLight1.3b. We show that despite temporal differences, MD- and FP-based readouts of DA correlate well within mice. Down-sampling of FP data showed temporal correlation to MD data, with less variance observed using FP. We also present evidence that DA fluctuations periodically reach low levels, and naïve animals have rapid, predrug DA dynamics measured with FP that correlate to the subsequent pharmacodynamics of amphetamine as measured with MD and FP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10161225 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101612252023-05-06 Within-Mice Comparison of Microdialysis and Fiber Photometry-Recorded Dopamine Biosensor during Amphetamine Response Ejdrup, Aske L. Wellbourne-Wood, Joel Dreyer, Jakob K. Guldhammer, Nina Lycas, Matthew D. Gether, Ulrik Hall, Benjamin J. Sørensen, Gunnar ACS Chem Neurosci [Image: see text] A fundamental concept in neuroscience is the transmission of information between neurons via neurotransmitters, -modulators, and -peptides. For the past decades, the gold standard for measuring neurochemicals in awake animals has been microdialysis (MD). The emergence of genetically encoded fluorescence-based biosensors, as well as in vivo optical techniques such as fiber photometry (FP), has introduced technologically distinct means of measuring neurotransmission. To directly compare MD and FP, we performed concurrent within-animal recordings of extracellular dopamine (DA) in the dorsal striatum (DS) before and after administration of amphetamine in awake, freely behaving mice expressing the dopamine sensor dLight1.3b. We show that despite temporal differences, MD- and FP-based readouts of DA correlate well within mice. Down-sampling of FP data showed temporal correlation to MD data, with less variance observed using FP. We also present evidence that DA fluctuations periodically reach low levels, and naïve animals have rapid, predrug DA dynamics measured with FP that correlate to the subsequent pharmacodynamics of amphetamine as measured with MD and FP. American Chemical Society 2023-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10161225/ /pubmed/37043174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.2c00817 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Ejdrup, Aske L. Wellbourne-Wood, Joel Dreyer, Jakob K. Guldhammer, Nina Lycas, Matthew D. Gether, Ulrik Hall, Benjamin J. Sørensen, Gunnar Within-Mice Comparison of Microdialysis and Fiber Photometry-Recorded Dopamine Biosensor during Amphetamine Response |
title | Within-Mice
Comparison of Microdialysis and Fiber
Photometry-Recorded Dopamine Biosensor during Amphetamine Response |
title_full | Within-Mice
Comparison of Microdialysis and Fiber
Photometry-Recorded Dopamine Biosensor during Amphetamine Response |
title_fullStr | Within-Mice
Comparison of Microdialysis and Fiber
Photometry-Recorded Dopamine Biosensor during Amphetamine Response |
title_full_unstemmed | Within-Mice
Comparison of Microdialysis and Fiber
Photometry-Recorded Dopamine Biosensor during Amphetamine Response |
title_short | Within-Mice
Comparison of Microdialysis and Fiber
Photometry-Recorded Dopamine Biosensor during Amphetamine Response |
title_sort | within-mice
comparison of microdialysis and fiber
photometry-recorded dopamine biosensor during amphetamine response |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37043174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.2c00817 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ejdrupaskel withinmicecomparisonofmicrodialysisandfiberphotometryrecordeddopaminebiosensorduringamphetamineresponse AT wellbournewoodjoel withinmicecomparisonofmicrodialysisandfiberphotometryrecordeddopaminebiosensorduringamphetamineresponse AT dreyerjakobk withinmicecomparisonofmicrodialysisandfiberphotometryrecordeddopaminebiosensorduringamphetamineresponse AT guldhammernina withinmicecomparisonofmicrodialysisandfiberphotometryrecordeddopaminebiosensorduringamphetamineresponse AT lycasmatthewd withinmicecomparisonofmicrodialysisandfiberphotometryrecordeddopaminebiosensorduringamphetamineresponse AT getherulrik withinmicecomparisonofmicrodialysisandfiberphotometryrecordeddopaminebiosensorduringamphetamineresponse AT hallbenjaminj withinmicecomparisonofmicrodialysisandfiberphotometryrecordeddopaminebiosensorduringamphetamineresponse AT sørensengunnar withinmicecomparisonofmicrodialysisandfiberphotometryrecordeddopaminebiosensorduringamphetamineresponse |