Cargando…
Current Best Practices for Analysis of Dendritic Spine Morphology and Number in Neurodevelopmental Disorder Research
[Image: see text] Quantitative methods for assessing neural anatomy have rapidly evolved in neuroscience and provide important insights into brain health and function. However, as new techniques develop, it is not always clear when and how each may be used to answer specific scientific questions pos...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37070364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.3c00062 |
_version_ | 1785037448509652992 |
---|---|
author | Li, Ben-Zheng Sumera, Anna Booker, Sam A McCullagh, Elizabeth A. |
author_facet | Li, Ben-Zheng Sumera, Anna Booker, Sam A McCullagh, Elizabeth A. |
author_sort | Li, Ben-Zheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Quantitative methods for assessing neural anatomy have rapidly evolved in neuroscience and provide important insights into brain health and function. However, as new techniques develop, it is not always clear when and how each may be used to answer specific scientific questions posed. Dendritic spines, which are often indicative of synapse formation and neural plasticity, have been implicated across many brain regions in neurodevelopmental disorders as a marker for neural changes reflecting neural dysfunction or alterations. In this Perspective we highlight several techniques for staining, imaging, and quantifying dendritic spines as well as provide a framework for avoiding potential issues related to pseudoreplication. This framework illustrates how others may apply the most rigorous approaches. We consider the cost-benefit analysis of the varied techniques, recognizing that the most sophisticated equipment may not always be necessary for answering some research questions. Together, we hope this piece will help researchers determine the best strategy toward using the ever-growing number of techniques available to determine neural changes underlying dendritic spine morphology in health and neurodevelopmental disorders. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10161226 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101612262023-05-06 Current Best Practices for Analysis of Dendritic Spine Morphology and Number in Neurodevelopmental Disorder Research Li, Ben-Zheng Sumera, Anna Booker, Sam A McCullagh, Elizabeth A. ACS Chem Neurosci [Image: see text] Quantitative methods for assessing neural anatomy have rapidly evolved in neuroscience and provide important insights into brain health and function. However, as new techniques develop, it is not always clear when and how each may be used to answer specific scientific questions posed. Dendritic spines, which are often indicative of synapse formation and neural plasticity, have been implicated across many brain regions in neurodevelopmental disorders as a marker for neural changes reflecting neural dysfunction or alterations. In this Perspective we highlight several techniques for staining, imaging, and quantifying dendritic spines as well as provide a framework for avoiding potential issues related to pseudoreplication. This framework illustrates how others may apply the most rigorous approaches. We consider the cost-benefit analysis of the varied techniques, recognizing that the most sophisticated equipment may not always be necessary for answering some research questions. Together, we hope this piece will help researchers determine the best strategy toward using the ever-growing number of techniques available to determine neural changes underlying dendritic spine morphology in health and neurodevelopmental disorders. American Chemical Society 2023-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10161226/ /pubmed/37070364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.3c00062 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Li, Ben-Zheng Sumera, Anna Booker, Sam A McCullagh, Elizabeth A. Current Best Practices for Analysis of Dendritic Spine Morphology and Number in Neurodevelopmental Disorder Research |
title | Current Best
Practices for Analysis of Dendritic Spine
Morphology and Number in Neurodevelopmental Disorder Research |
title_full | Current Best
Practices for Analysis of Dendritic Spine
Morphology and Number in Neurodevelopmental Disorder Research |
title_fullStr | Current Best
Practices for Analysis of Dendritic Spine
Morphology and Number in Neurodevelopmental Disorder Research |
title_full_unstemmed | Current Best
Practices for Analysis of Dendritic Spine
Morphology and Number in Neurodevelopmental Disorder Research |
title_short | Current Best
Practices for Analysis of Dendritic Spine
Morphology and Number in Neurodevelopmental Disorder Research |
title_sort | current best
practices for analysis of dendritic spine
morphology and number in neurodevelopmental disorder research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37070364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.3c00062 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT libenzheng currentbestpracticesforanalysisofdendriticspinemorphologyandnumberinneurodevelopmentaldisorderresearch AT sumeraanna currentbestpracticesforanalysisofdendriticspinemorphologyandnumberinneurodevelopmentaldisorderresearch AT bookersama currentbestpracticesforanalysisofdendriticspinemorphologyandnumberinneurodevelopmentaldisorderresearch AT mccullaghelizabetha currentbestpracticesforanalysisofdendriticspinemorphologyandnumberinneurodevelopmentaldisorderresearch |