Cargando…

Current Best Practices for Analysis of Dendritic Spine Morphology and Number in Neurodevelopmental Disorder Research

[Image: see text] Quantitative methods for assessing neural anatomy have rapidly evolved in neuroscience and provide important insights into brain health and function. However, as new techniques develop, it is not always clear when and how each may be used to answer specific scientific questions pos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Ben-Zheng, Sumera, Anna, Booker, Sam A, McCullagh, Elizabeth A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37070364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.3c00062
_version_ 1785037448509652992
author Li, Ben-Zheng
Sumera, Anna
Booker, Sam A
McCullagh, Elizabeth A.
author_facet Li, Ben-Zheng
Sumera, Anna
Booker, Sam A
McCullagh, Elizabeth A.
author_sort Li, Ben-Zheng
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Quantitative methods for assessing neural anatomy have rapidly evolved in neuroscience and provide important insights into brain health and function. However, as new techniques develop, it is not always clear when and how each may be used to answer specific scientific questions posed. Dendritic spines, which are often indicative of synapse formation and neural plasticity, have been implicated across many brain regions in neurodevelopmental disorders as a marker for neural changes reflecting neural dysfunction or alterations. In this Perspective we highlight several techniques for staining, imaging, and quantifying dendritic spines as well as provide a framework for avoiding potential issues related to pseudoreplication. This framework illustrates how others may apply the most rigorous approaches. We consider the cost-benefit analysis of the varied techniques, recognizing that the most sophisticated equipment may not always be necessary for answering some research questions. Together, we hope this piece will help researchers determine the best strategy toward using the ever-growing number of techniques available to determine neural changes underlying dendritic spine morphology in health and neurodevelopmental disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10161226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101612262023-05-06 Current Best Practices for Analysis of Dendritic Spine Morphology and Number in Neurodevelopmental Disorder Research Li, Ben-Zheng Sumera, Anna Booker, Sam A McCullagh, Elizabeth A. ACS Chem Neurosci [Image: see text] Quantitative methods for assessing neural anatomy have rapidly evolved in neuroscience and provide important insights into brain health and function. However, as new techniques develop, it is not always clear when and how each may be used to answer specific scientific questions posed. Dendritic spines, which are often indicative of synapse formation and neural plasticity, have been implicated across many brain regions in neurodevelopmental disorders as a marker for neural changes reflecting neural dysfunction or alterations. In this Perspective we highlight several techniques for staining, imaging, and quantifying dendritic spines as well as provide a framework for avoiding potential issues related to pseudoreplication. This framework illustrates how others may apply the most rigorous approaches. We consider the cost-benefit analysis of the varied techniques, recognizing that the most sophisticated equipment may not always be necessary for answering some research questions. Together, we hope this piece will help researchers determine the best strategy toward using the ever-growing number of techniques available to determine neural changes underlying dendritic spine morphology in health and neurodevelopmental disorders. American Chemical Society 2023-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10161226/ /pubmed/37070364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.3c00062 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Li, Ben-Zheng
Sumera, Anna
Booker, Sam A
McCullagh, Elizabeth A.
Current Best Practices for Analysis of Dendritic Spine Morphology and Number in Neurodevelopmental Disorder Research
title Current Best Practices for Analysis of Dendritic Spine Morphology and Number in Neurodevelopmental Disorder Research
title_full Current Best Practices for Analysis of Dendritic Spine Morphology and Number in Neurodevelopmental Disorder Research
title_fullStr Current Best Practices for Analysis of Dendritic Spine Morphology and Number in Neurodevelopmental Disorder Research
title_full_unstemmed Current Best Practices for Analysis of Dendritic Spine Morphology and Number in Neurodevelopmental Disorder Research
title_short Current Best Practices for Analysis of Dendritic Spine Morphology and Number in Neurodevelopmental Disorder Research
title_sort current best practices for analysis of dendritic spine morphology and number in neurodevelopmental disorder research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37070364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.3c00062
work_keys_str_mv AT libenzheng currentbestpracticesforanalysisofdendriticspinemorphologyandnumberinneurodevelopmentaldisorderresearch
AT sumeraanna currentbestpracticesforanalysisofdendriticspinemorphologyandnumberinneurodevelopmentaldisorderresearch
AT bookersama currentbestpracticesforanalysisofdendriticspinemorphologyandnumberinneurodevelopmentaldisorderresearch
AT mccullaghelizabetha currentbestpracticesforanalysisofdendriticspinemorphologyandnumberinneurodevelopmentaldisorderresearch