Cargando…

Gingival biotype modification with collagen matrix or autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft: Histologic and volumetric analyses in a beagle model

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the volumetric effect and biocompatibility of porcine tendon-derived type I collagen matrix graft (CG) in gingival biotype modification (GBM) compared with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) in a beagle model. METHODS: Surface analysis using scanning electron micros...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Yoonsub, Lee, Jung-Tae, Han, Hee-seung, Oh, Seunghan, Cho, Young-Dan, Kim, Sungtae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37151660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15026
_version_ 1785037478178062336
author Lee, Yoonsub
Lee, Jung-Tae
Han, Hee-seung
Oh, Seunghan
Cho, Young-Dan
Kim, Sungtae
author_facet Lee, Yoonsub
Lee, Jung-Tae
Han, Hee-seung
Oh, Seunghan
Cho, Young-Dan
Kim, Sungtae
author_sort Lee, Yoonsub
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the volumetric effect and biocompatibility of porcine tendon-derived type I collagen matrix graft (CG) in gingival biotype modification (GBM) compared with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) in a beagle model. METHODS: Surface analysis using scanning electron microscopy and a collagen degradation assay of CG was performed in vitro. Six adult dogs were used in in vivo experiment, and each received autologous SCTG or CG at the anterior side. Histometric and three-dimensional digital volume analyses were conducted to compare quantitative changes in CG and SCTG in GBM. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed for the qualitative evaluation of CG compared to SCTG. RESULTS: CG had a double-layered structure, and its degradation was slower than that of other well-reported materials. No critical problems were associated with the healing procedure. Changes in gingival thickness and volume in the CG and SCTG groups were equivalent, with no significant differences between the groups. Type I collagen and vascular endothelial growth factor expression levels were similar in both groups. SIGNIFICANCE: CG and SCTG had equivalent potential for GBM in terms of quantity and quality. Additionally, CG could be used as a reasonable substitute for SCTG, making surgery convenient and predicting successful clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10161361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101613612023-05-06 Gingival biotype modification with collagen matrix or autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft: Histologic and volumetric analyses in a beagle model Lee, Yoonsub Lee, Jung-Tae Han, Hee-seung Oh, Seunghan Cho, Young-Dan Kim, Sungtae Heliyon Research Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the volumetric effect and biocompatibility of porcine tendon-derived type I collagen matrix graft (CG) in gingival biotype modification (GBM) compared with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) in a beagle model. METHODS: Surface analysis using scanning electron microscopy and a collagen degradation assay of CG was performed in vitro. Six adult dogs were used in in vivo experiment, and each received autologous SCTG or CG at the anterior side. Histometric and three-dimensional digital volume analyses were conducted to compare quantitative changes in CG and SCTG in GBM. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed for the qualitative evaluation of CG compared to SCTG. RESULTS: CG had a double-layered structure, and its degradation was slower than that of other well-reported materials. No critical problems were associated with the healing procedure. Changes in gingival thickness and volume in the CG and SCTG groups were equivalent, with no significant differences between the groups. Type I collagen and vascular endothelial growth factor expression levels were similar in both groups. SIGNIFICANCE: CG and SCTG had equivalent potential for GBM in terms of quantity and quality. Additionally, CG could be used as a reasonable substitute for SCTG, making surgery convenient and predicting successful clinical outcomes. Elsevier 2023-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10161361/ /pubmed/37151660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15026 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Lee, Yoonsub
Lee, Jung-Tae
Han, Hee-seung
Oh, Seunghan
Cho, Young-Dan
Kim, Sungtae
Gingival biotype modification with collagen matrix or autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft: Histologic and volumetric analyses in a beagle model
title Gingival biotype modification with collagen matrix or autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft: Histologic and volumetric analyses in a beagle model
title_full Gingival biotype modification with collagen matrix or autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft: Histologic and volumetric analyses in a beagle model
title_fullStr Gingival biotype modification with collagen matrix or autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft: Histologic and volumetric analyses in a beagle model
title_full_unstemmed Gingival biotype modification with collagen matrix or autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft: Histologic and volumetric analyses in a beagle model
title_short Gingival biotype modification with collagen matrix or autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft: Histologic and volumetric analyses in a beagle model
title_sort gingival biotype modification with collagen matrix or autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft: histologic and volumetric analyses in a beagle model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37151660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15026
work_keys_str_mv AT leeyoonsub gingivalbiotypemodificationwithcollagenmatrixorautogenoussubepithelialconnectivetissuegrafthistologicandvolumetricanalysesinabeaglemodel
AT leejungtae gingivalbiotypemodificationwithcollagenmatrixorautogenoussubepithelialconnectivetissuegrafthistologicandvolumetricanalysesinabeaglemodel
AT hanheeseung gingivalbiotypemodificationwithcollagenmatrixorautogenoussubepithelialconnectivetissuegrafthistologicandvolumetricanalysesinabeaglemodel
AT ohseunghan gingivalbiotypemodificationwithcollagenmatrixorautogenoussubepithelialconnectivetissuegrafthistologicandvolumetricanalysesinabeaglemodel
AT choyoungdan gingivalbiotypemodificationwithcollagenmatrixorautogenoussubepithelialconnectivetissuegrafthistologicandvolumetricanalysesinabeaglemodel
AT kimsungtae gingivalbiotypemodificationwithcollagenmatrixorautogenoussubepithelialconnectivetissuegrafthistologicandvolumetricanalysesinabeaglemodel