Cargando…
The development and phase 1 evaluation of a Decision Aid for elective egg freezing
BACKGROUND: Elective egg freezing decisions are complex. We developed a Decision Aid for elective egg freezing and conducted a phase 1 study to evaluate its acceptability and utility for decision-making. METHODS: The online Decision Aid was developed according to International Patient Decision Aid S...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37147687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02178-4 |
_version_ | 1785037489715544064 |
---|---|
author | Sandhu, Sherine Hickey, Martha Lew, Raelia Hammarberg, Karin Braat, Sabine Agresta, Franca Parle, Anna Allingham, Catherine Peate, Michelle |
author_facet | Sandhu, Sherine Hickey, Martha Lew, Raelia Hammarberg, Karin Braat, Sabine Agresta, Franca Parle, Anna Allingham, Catherine Peate, Michelle |
author_sort | Sandhu, Sherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Elective egg freezing decisions are complex. We developed a Decision Aid for elective egg freezing and conducted a phase 1 study to evaluate its acceptability and utility for decision-making. METHODS: The online Decision Aid was developed according to International Patient Decision Aid Standards and evaluated using a pre/post survey design. Twenty-six Australian women aged 18–45 years, interested in receiving elective egg freezing information, proficient in English, and with access to the internet were recruited using social media and university newsletters. Main outcomes were: acceptability of the Decision Aid; feedback on the Decision Aid design and content; concern raised by the Decision Aid, and; utility of the Decision Aid as measured by scores on the Decisional Conflict Scale and on a study-specific scale assessing knowledge about egg freezing and age-related infertility. RESULTS: Most participants found the Decision Aid acceptable (23/25), balanced (21/26), useful for explaining their options (23/26), and for reaching a decision (18/26). Almost all reported satisfaction with the Decision Aid (25/26) and the level of guidance it provided (25/26). No participant reported serious concerns about the Decision Aid, and most would recommend it to other women considering elective egg freezing (22/26). Median Decisional Conflict Scale score decreased from 65/100 (Interquartile range: 45–80) pre-Decision Aid to 7.5/100 (Interquartile range: 0–37.5) post-Decision Aid review (p < 0.001). Median knowledge score increased from 8.5/14 (Interquartile range: 7–11) pre-Decision Aid to 11/14 (Interquartile range: 10–12) post-Decision Aid review (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: This elective egg freezing Decision Aid appears acceptable and useful for decision-making. It improved knowledge, reduced decisional conflict and did not raise serious concerns. The Decision Aid will be further evaluated using a prospective randomised control trial. STUDY REGISTRATION: ACTRN12618001685202 (retrospectively registered: 12 October 2018). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-023-02178-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10161420 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101614202023-05-06 The development and phase 1 evaluation of a Decision Aid for elective egg freezing Sandhu, Sherine Hickey, Martha Lew, Raelia Hammarberg, Karin Braat, Sabine Agresta, Franca Parle, Anna Allingham, Catherine Peate, Michelle BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research BACKGROUND: Elective egg freezing decisions are complex. We developed a Decision Aid for elective egg freezing and conducted a phase 1 study to evaluate its acceptability and utility for decision-making. METHODS: The online Decision Aid was developed according to International Patient Decision Aid Standards and evaluated using a pre/post survey design. Twenty-six Australian women aged 18–45 years, interested in receiving elective egg freezing information, proficient in English, and with access to the internet were recruited using social media and university newsletters. Main outcomes were: acceptability of the Decision Aid; feedback on the Decision Aid design and content; concern raised by the Decision Aid, and; utility of the Decision Aid as measured by scores on the Decisional Conflict Scale and on a study-specific scale assessing knowledge about egg freezing and age-related infertility. RESULTS: Most participants found the Decision Aid acceptable (23/25), balanced (21/26), useful for explaining their options (23/26), and for reaching a decision (18/26). Almost all reported satisfaction with the Decision Aid (25/26) and the level of guidance it provided (25/26). No participant reported serious concerns about the Decision Aid, and most would recommend it to other women considering elective egg freezing (22/26). Median Decisional Conflict Scale score decreased from 65/100 (Interquartile range: 45–80) pre-Decision Aid to 7.5/100 (Interquartile range: 0–37.5) post-Decision Aid review (p < 0.001). Median knowledge score increased from 8.5/14 (Interquartile range: 7–11) pre-Decision Aid to 11/14 (Interquartile range: 10–12) post-Decision Aid review (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: This elective egg freezing Decision Aid appears acceptable and useful for decision-making. It improved knowledge, reduced decisional conflict and did not raise serious concerns. The Decision Aid will be further evaluated using a prospective randomised control trial. STUDY REGISTRATION: ACTRN12618001685202 (retrospectively registered: 12 October 2018). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-023-02178-4. BioMed Central 2023-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10161420/ /pubmed/37147687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02178-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Sandhu, Sherine Hickey, Martha Lew, Raelia Hammarberg, Karin Braat, Sabine Agresta, Franca Parle, Anna Allingham, Catherine Peate, Michelle The development and phase 1 evaluation of a Decision Aid for elective egg freezing |
title | The development and phase 1 evaluation of a Decision Aid for elective egg freezing |
title_full | The development and phase 1 evaluation of a Decision Aid for elective egg freezing |
title_fullStr | The development and phase 1 evaluation of a Decision Aid for elective egg freezing |
title_full_unstemmed | The development and phase 1 evaluation of a Decision Aid for elective egg freezing |
title_short | The development and phase 1 evaluation of a Decision Aid for elective egg freezing |
title_sort | development and phase 1 evaluation of a decision aid for elective egg freezing |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37147687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02178-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sandhusherine thedevelopmentandphase1evaluationofadecisionaidforelectiveeggfreezing AT hickeymartha thedevelopmentandphase1evaluationofadecisionaidforelectiveeggfreezing AT lewraelia thedevelopmentandphase1evaluationofadecisionaidforelectiveeggfreezing AT hammarbergkarin thedevelopmentandphase1evaluationofadecisionaidforelectiveeggfreezing AT braatsabine thedevelopmentandphase1evaluationofadecisionaidforelectiveeggfreezing AT agrestafranca thedevelopmentandphase1evaluationofadecisionaidforelectiveeggfreezing AT parleanna thedevelopmentandphase1evaluationofadecisionaidforelectiveeggfreezing AT allinghamcatherine thedevelopmentandphase1evaluationofadecisionaidforelectiveeggfreezing AT thedevelopmentandphase1evaluationofadecisionaidforelectiveeggfreezing AT peatemichelle thedevelopmentandphase1evaluationofadecisionaidforelectiveeggfreezing AT sandhusherine developmentandphase1evaluationofadecisionaidforelectiveeggfreezing AT hickeymartha developmentandphase1evaluationofadecisionaidforelectiveeggfreezing AT lewraelia developmentandphase1evaluationofadecisionaidforelectiveeggfreezing AT hammarbergkarin developmentandphase1evaluationofadecisionaidforelectiveeggfreezing AT braatsabine developmentandphase1evaluationofadecisionaidforelectiveeggfreezing AT agrestafranca developmentandphase1evaluationofadecisionaidforelectiveeggfreezing AT parleanna developmentandphase1evaluationofadecisionaidforelectiveeggfreezing AT allinghamcatherine developmentandphase1evaluationofadecisionaidforelectiveeggfreezing AT developmentandphase1evaluationofadecisionaidforelectiveeggfreezing AT peatemichelle developmentandphase1evaluationofadecisionaidforelectiveeggfreezing |