Cargando…
Harmonised culture procedures minimise but do not eliminate mesenchymal stromal cell donor and tissue variability in a decentralised multicentre manufacturing approach
BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), commonly sourced from adipose tissue, bone marrow and umbilical cord, have been widely used in many medical conditions due to their therapeutic potential. Yet, the still limited understanding of the underlying mechanisms of action hampers clinical transl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37143116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-023-03352-1 |
_version_ | 1785037506290384896 |
---|---|
author | Calcat-i-Cervera, Sandra Rendra, Erika Scaccia, Eleonora Amadeo, Francesco Hanson, Vivien Wilm, Bettina Murray, Patricia O’Brien, Timothy Taylor, Arthur Bieback, Karen |
author_facet | Calcat-i-Cervera, Sandra Rendra, Erika Scaccia, Eleonora Amadeo, Francesco Hanson, Vivien Wilm, Bettina Murray, Patricia O’Brien, Timothy Taylor, Arthur Bieback, Karen |
author_sort | Calcat-i-Cervera, Sandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), commonly sourced from adipose tissue, bone marrow and umbilical cord, have been widely used in many medical conditions due to their therapeutic potential. Yet, the still limited understanding of the underlying mechanisms of action hampers clinical translation. Clinical potency can vary considerably depending on tissue source, donor attributes, but importantly, also culture conditions. Lack of standard procedures hinders inter-study comparability and delays the progression of the field. The aim of this study was A- to assess the impact on MSC characteristics when different laboratories, performed analysis on the same MSC material using harmonised culture conditions and B- to understand source-specific differences. METHODS: Three independent institutions performed a head-to-head comparison of human-derived adipose (A-), bone marrow (BM-), and umbilical cord (UC-) MSCs using harmonised culture conditions. In each centre, cells from one specific tissue source were isolated and later distributed across the network to assess their biological properties, including cell expansion, immune phenotype, and tri-lineage differentiation (part A). To assess tissue-specific function, angiogenic and immunomodulatory properties and the in vivo biodistribution were compared in one expert lab (part B). RESULTS: By implementing a harmonised manufacturing workflow, we obtained largely reproducible results across three independent laboratories in part A of our study. Unique growth patterns and differentiation potential were observed for each tissue source, with similar trends observed between centres. Immune phenotyping verified expression of typical MSC surface markers and absence of contaminating surface markers. Depending on the established protocols in the different laboratories, quantitative data varied slightly. Functional experiments in part B concluded that conditioned media from BM-MSCs significantly enhanced tubulogenesis and endothelial migration in vitro. In contrast, immunomodulatory studies reported superior immunosuppressive abilities for A-MSCs. Biodistribution studies in healthy mice showed lung entrapment after administration of all three types of MSCs, with a significantly faster clearance of BM-MSCs. CONCLUSION: These results show the heterogeneous behaviour and regenerative properties of MSCs as a reflection of intrinsic tissue-origin properties while providing evidence that the use of harmonised culture procedures can reduce but do not eliminate inter-lab and operator differences. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13287-023-03352-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10161493 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101614932023-05-06 Harmonised culture procedures minimise but do not eliminate mesenchymal stromal cell donor and tissue variability in a decentralised multicentre manufacturing approach Calcat-i-Cervera, Sandra Rendra, Erika Scaccia, Eleonora Amadeo, Francesco Hanson, Vivien Wilm, Bettina Murray, Patricia O’Brien, Timothy Taylor, Arthur Bieback, Karen Stem Cell Res Ther Research BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), commonly sourced from adipose tissue, bone marrow and umbilical cord, have been widely used in many medical conditions due to their therapeutic potential. Yet, the still limited understanding of the underlying mechanisms of action hampers clinical translation. Clinical potency can vary considerably depending on tissue source, donor attributes, but importantly, also culture conditions. Lack of standard procedures hinders inter-study comparability and delays the progression of the field. The aim of this study was A- to assess the impact on MSC characteristics when different laboratories, performed analysis on the same MSC material using harmonised culture conditions and B- to understand source-specific differences. METHODS: Three independent institutions performed a head-to-head comparison of human-derived adipose (A-), bone marrow (BM-), and umbilical cord (UC-) MSCs using harmonised culture conditions. In each centre, cells from one specific tissue source were isolated and later distributed across the network to assess their biological properties, including cell expansion, immune phenotype, and tri-lineage differentiation (part A). To assess tissue-specific function, angiogenic and immunomodulatory properties and the in vivo biodistribution were compared in one expert lab (part B). RESULTS: By implementing a harmonised manufacturing workflow, we obtained largely reproducible results across three independent laboratories in part A of our study. Unique growth patterns and differentiation potential were observed for each tissue source, with similar trends observed between centres. Immune phenotyping verified expression of typical MSC surface markers and absence of contaminating surface markers. Depending on the established protocols in the different laboratories, quantitative data varied slightly. Functional experiments in part B concluded that conditioned media from BM-MSCs significantly enhanced tubulogenesis and endothelial migration in vitro. In contrast, immunomodulatory studies reported superior immunosuppressive abilities for A-MSCs. Biodistribution studies in healthy mice showed lung entrapment after administration of all three types of MSCs, with a significantly faster clearance of BM-MSCs. CONCLUSION: These results show the heterogeneous behaviour and regenerative properties of MSCs as a reflection of intrinsic tissue-origin properties while providing evidence that the use of harmonised culture procedures can reduce but do not eliminate inter-lab and operator differences. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13287-023-03352-1. BioMed Central 2023-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10161493/ /pubmed/37143116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-023-03352-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Calcat-i-Cervera, Sandra Rendra, Erika Scaccia, Eleonora Amadeo, Francesco Hanson, Vivien Wilm, Bettina Murray, Patricia O’Brien, Timothy Taylor, Arthur Bieback, Karen Harmonised culture procedures minimise but do not eliminate mesenchymal stromal cell donor and tissue variability in a decentralised multicentre manufacturing approach |
title | Harmonised culture procedures minimise but do not eliminate mesenchymal stromal cell donor and tissue variability in a decentralised multicentre manufacturing approach |
title_full | Harmonised culture procedures minimise but do not eliminate mesenchymal stromal cell donor and tissue variability in a decentralised multicentre manufacturing approach |
title_fullStr | Harmonised culture procedures minimise but do not eliminate mesenchymal stromal cell donor and tissue variability in a decentralised multicentre manufacturing approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Harmonised culture procedures minimise but do not eliminate mesenchymal stromal cell donor and tissue variability in a decentralised multicentre manufacturing approach |
title_short | Harmonised culture procedures minimise but do not eliminate mesenchymal stromal cell donor and tissue variability in a decentralised multicentre manufacturing approach |
title_sort | harmonised culture procedures minimise but do not eliminate mesenchymal stromal cell donor and tissue variability in a decentralised multicentre manufacturing approach |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37143116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-023-03352-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT calcaticerverasandra harmonisedcultureproceduresminimisebutdonoteliminatemesenchymalstromalcelldonorandtissuevariabilityinadecentralisedmulticentremanufacturingapproach AT rendraerika harmonisedcultureproceduresminimisebutdonoteliminatemesenchymalstromalcelldonorandtissuevariabilityinadecentralisedmulticentremanufacturingapproach AT scacciaeleonora harmonisedcultureproceduresminimisebutdonoteliminatemesenchymalstromalcelldonorandtissuevariabilityinadecentralisedmulticentremanufacturingapproach AT amadeofrancesco harmonisedcultureproceduresminimisebutdonoteliminatemesenchymalstromalcelldonorandtissuevariabilityinadecentralisedmulticentremanufacturingapproach AT hansonvivien harmonisedcultureproceduresminimisebutdonoteliminatemesenchymalstromalcelldonorandtissuevariabilityinadecentralisedmulticentremanufacturingapproach AT wilmbettina harmonisedcultureproceduresminimisebutdonoteliminatemesenchymalstromalcelldonorandtissuevariabilityinadecentralisedmulticentremanufacturingapproach AT murraypatricia harmonisedcultureproceduresminimisebutdonoteliminatemesenchymalstromalcelldonorandtissuevariabilityinadecentralisedmulticentremanufacturingapproach AT obrientimothy harmonisedcultureproceduresminimisebutdonoteliminatemesenchymalstromalcelldonorandtissuevariabilityinadecentralisedmulticentremanufacturingapproach AT taylorarthur harmonisedcultureproceduresminimisebutdonoteliminatemesenchymalstromalcelldonorandtissuevariabilityinadecentralisedmulticentremanufacturingapproach AT biebackkaren harmonisedcultureproceduresminimisebutdonoteliminatemesenchymalstromalcelldonorandtissuevariabilityinadecentralisedmulticentremanufacturingapproach |