Cargando…

High- versus Low-Flow Extracorporeal Respiratory Support in Experimental Hypoxemic Acute Lung Injury

RATIONALE: In the EOLIA (ECMO to Rescue Lung Injury in Severe ARDS) trial, oxygenation was similar between intervention and conventional groups, whereas [Formula: see text] e was reduced in the intervention group. Comparable reductions in ventilation intensity are theoretically possible with low-flo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brusatori, Serena, Zinnato, Carmelo, Busana, Mattia, Romitti, Federica, Gattarello, Simone, Palumbo, Maria Michela, Pozzi, Tommaso, Steinberg, Irene, Palermo, Paola, Lazzari, Stefano, Maj, Roberta, Velati, Mara, D’Albo, Rosanna, Wassong, Jona, Meissner, Killian, Lombardo, Fabio, Herrmann, Peter, Quintel, Michael, Moerer, Onnen, Camporota, Luigi, Marini, John J., Meissner, Konrad, Gattinoni, Luciano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Thoracic Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36848321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202212-2194OC
_version_ 1785037558028173312
author Brusatori, Serena
Zinnato, Carmelo
Busana, Mattia
Romitti, Federica
Gattarello, Simone
Palumbo, Maria Michela
Pozzi, Tommaso
Steinberg, Irene
Palermo, Paola
Lazzari, Stefano
Maj, Roberta
Velati, Mara
D’Albo, Rosanna
Wassong, Jona
Meissner, Killian
Lombardo, Fabio
Herrmann, Peter
Quintel, Michael
Moerer, Onnen
Camporota, Luigi
Marini, John J.
Meissner, Konrad
Gattinoni, Luciano
author_facet Brusatori, Serena
Zinnato, Carmelo
Busana, Mattia
Romitti, Federica
Gattarello, Simone
Palumbo, Maria Michela
Pozzi, Tommaso
Steinberg, Irene
Palermo, Paola
Lazzari, Stefano
Maj, Roberta
Velati, Mara
D’Albo, Rosanna
Wassong, Jona
Meissner, Killian
Lombardo, Fabio
Herrmann, Peter
Quintel, Michael
Moerer, Onnen
Camporota, Luigi
Marini, John J.
Meissner, Konrad
Gattinoni, Luciano
author_sort Brusatori, Serena
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: In the EOLIA (ECMO to Rescue Lung Injury in Severe ARDS) trial, oxygenation was similar between intervention and conventional groups, whereas [Formula: see text] e was reduced in the intervention group. Comparable reductions in ventilation intensity are theoretically possible with low-flow extracorporeal CO(2) removal (ECCO(2)R), provided oxygenation remains acceptable. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of ECCO(2)R and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and hemodynamics in animal models of pulmonary (intratracheal hydrochloric acid) and extrapulmonary (intravenous oleic acid) lung injury. METHODS: Twenty-four pigs with moderate to severe hypoxemia (Pa(O(2)):Fi(O(2)) ⩽ 150 mm Hg) were randomized to ECMO (blood flow 50–60 ml/kg/min), ECCO(2)R (0.4 L/min), or mechanical ventilation alone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: [Formula: see text] o(2), [Formula: see text] co(2), gas exchange, hemodynamics, and respiratory mechanics were measured and are presented as 24-hour averages. Oleic acid versus hydrochloric acid showed higher extravascular lung water (1,424 ± 419 vs. 574 ± 195 ml; P < 0.001), worse oxygenation (Pa(O(2)):Fi(O(2)) = 125 ± 14 vs. 151 ± 11 mm Hg; P < 0.001), but better respiratory mechanics (plateau pressure 27 ± 4 vs. 30 ± 3 cm H(2)O; P = 0.017). Both models led to acute severe pulmonary hypertension. In both models, ECMO (3.7 ± 0.5 L/min), compared with ECCO(2)R (0.4 L/min), increased mixed venous oxygen saturation and oxygenation, and improved hemodynamics (cardiac output = 6.0 ± 1.4 vs. 5.2 ± 1.4 L/min; P = 0.003). [Formula: see text] o(2) and [Formula: see text] co(2), irrespective of lung injury model, were lower during ECMO, resulting in lower Pa(CO(2)) and [Formula: see text] e but worse respiratory elastance compared with ECCO(2)R (64 ± 27 vs. 40 ± 8 cm H(2)O/L; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ECMO was associated with better oxygenation, lower [Formula: see text] o(2), and better hemodynamics. ECCO(2)R may offer a potential alternative to ECMO, but there are concerns regarding its effects on hemodynamics and pulmonary hypertension.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10161753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Thoracic Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101617532023-05-06 High- versus Low-Flow Extracorporeal Respiratory Support in Experimental Hypoxemic Acute Lung Injury Brusatori, Serena Zinnato, Carmelo Busana, Mattia Romitti, Federica Gattarello, Simone Palumbo, Maria Michela Pozzi, Tommaso Steinberg, Irene Palermo, Paola Lazzari, Stefano Maj, Roberta Velati, Mara D’Albo, Rosanna Wassong, Jona Meissner, Killian Lombardo, Fabio Herrmann, Peter Quintel, Michael Moerer, Onnen Camporota, Luigi Marini, John J. Meissner, Konrad Gattinoni, Luciano Am J Respir Crit Care Med Original Articles RATIONALE: In the EOLIA (ECMO to Rescue Lung Injury in Severe ARDS) trial, oxygenation was similar between intervention and conventional groups, whereas [Formula: see text] e was reduced in the intervention group. Comparable reductions in ventilation intensity are theoretically possible with low-flow extracorporeal CO(2) removal (ECCO(2)R), provided oxygenation remains acceptable. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of ECCO(2)R and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and hemodynamics in animal models of pulmonary (intratracheal hydrochloric acid) and extrapulmonary (intravenous oleic acid) lung injury. METHODS: Twenty-four pigs with moderate to severe hypoxemia (Pa(O(2)):Fi(O(2)) ⩽ 150 mm Hg) were randomized to ECMO (blood flow 50–60 ml/kg/min), ECCO(2)R (0.4 L/min), or mechanical ventilation alone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: [Formula: see text] o(2), [Formula: see text] co(2), gas exchange, hemodynamics, and respiratory mechanics were measured and are presented as 24-hour averages. Oleic acid versus hydrochloric acid showed higher extravascular lung water (1,424 ± 419 vs. 574 ± 195 ml; P < 0.001), worse oxygenation (Pa(O(2)):Fi(O(2)) = 125 ± 14 vs. 151 ± 11 mm Hg; P < 0.001), but better respiratory mechanics (plateau pressure 27 ± 4 vs. 30 ± 3 cm H(2)O; P = 0.017). Both models led to acute severe pulmonary hypertension. In both models, ECMO (3.7 ± 0.5 L/min), compared with ECCO(2)R (0.4 L/min), increased mixed venous oxygen saturation and oxygenation, and improved hemodynamics (cardiac output = 6.0 ± 1.4 vs. 5.2 ± 1.4 L/min; P = 0.003). [Formula: see text] o(2) and [Formula: see text] co(2), irrespective of lung injury model, were lower during ECMO, resulting in lower Pa(CO(2)) and [Formula: see text] e but worse respiratory elastance compared with ECCO(2)R (64 ± 27 vs. 40 ± 8 cm H(2)O/L; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ECMO was associated with better oxygenation, lower [Formula: see text] o(2), and better hemodynamics. ECCO(2)R may offer a potential alternative to ECMO, but there are concerns regarding its effects on hemodynamics and pulmonary hypertension. American Thoracic Society 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10161753/ /pubmed/36848321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202212-2194OC Text en Copyright © 2023 by the American Thoracic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . For commercial usage and reprints, please e-mail Diane Gern (dgern@thoracic.org).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Brusatori, Serena
Zinnato, Carmelo
Busana, Mattia
Romitti, Federica
Gattarello, Simone
Palumbo, Maria Michela
Pozzi, Tommaso
Steinberg, Irene
Palermo, Paola
Lazzari, Stefano
Maj, Roberta
Velati, Mara
D’Albo, Rosanna
Wassong, Jona
Meissner, Killian
Lombardo, Fabio
Herrmann, Peter
Quintel, Michael
Moerer, Onnen
Camporota, Luigi
Marini, John J.
Meissner, Konrad
Gattinoni, Luciano
High- versus Low-Flow Extracorporeal Respiratory Support in Experimental Hypoxemic Acute Lung Injury
title High- versus Low-Flow Extracorporeal Respiratory Support in Experimental Hypoxemic Acute Lung Injury
title_full High- versus Low-Flow Extracorporeal Respiratory Support in Experimental Hypoxemic Acute Lung Injury
title_fullStr High- versus Low-Flow Extracorporeal Respiratory Support in Experimental Hypoxemic Acute Lung Injury
title_full_unstemmed High- versus Low-Flow Extracorporeal Respiratory Support in Experimental Hypoxemic Acute Lung Injury
title_short High- versus Low-Flow Extracorporeal Respiratory Support in Experimental Hypoxemic Acute Lung Injury
title_sort high- versus low-flow extracorporeal respiratory support in experimental hypoxemic acute lung injury
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36848321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202212-2194OC
work_keys_str_mv AT brusatoriserena highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury
AT zinnatocarmelo highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury
AT busanamattia highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury
AT romittifederica highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury
AT gattarellosimone highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury
AT palumbomariamichela highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury
AT pozzitommaso highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury
AT steinbergirene highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury
AT palermopaola highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury
AT lazzaristefano highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury
AT majroberta highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury
AT velatimara highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury
AT dalborosanna highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury
AT wassongjona highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury
AT meissnerkillian highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury
AT lombardofabio highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury
AT herrmannpeter highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury
AT quintelmichael highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury
AT moereronnen highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury
AT camporotaluigi highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury
AT marinijohnj highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury
AT meissnerkonrad highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury
AT gattinoniluciano highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury