Cargando…
High- versus Low-Flow Extracorporeal Respiratory Support in Experimental Hypoxemic Acute Lung Injury
RATIONALE: In the EOLIA (ECMO to Rescue Lung Injury in Severe ARDS) trial, oxygenation was similar between intervention and conventional groups, whereas [Formula: see text] e was reduced in the intervention group. Comparable reductions in ventilation intensity are theoretically possible with low-flo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Thoracic Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36848321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202212-2194OC |
_version_ | 1785037558028173312 |
---|---|
author | Brusatori, Serena Zinnato, Carmelo Busana, Mattia Romitti, Federica Gattarello, Simone Palumbo, Maria Michela Pozzi, Tommaso Steinberg, Irene Palermo, Paola Lazzari, Stefano Maj, Roberta Velati, Mara D’Albo, Rosanna Wassong, Jona Meissner, Killian Lombardo, Fabio Herrmann, Peter Quintel, Michael Moerer, Onnen Camporota, Luigi Marini, John J. Meissner, Konrad Gattinoni, Luciano |
author_facet | Brusatori, Serena Zinnato, Carmelo Busana, Mattia Romitti, Federica Gattarello, Simone Palumbo, Maria Michela Pozzi, Tommaso Steinberg, Irene Palermo, Paola Lazzari, Stefano Maj, Roberta Velati, Mara D’Albo, Rosanna Wassong, Jona Meissner, Killian Lombardo, Fabio Herrmann, Peter Quintel, Michael Moerer, Onnen Camporota, Luigi Marini, John J. Meissner, Konrad Gattinoni, Luciano |
author_sort | Brusatori, Serena |
collection | PubMed |
description | RATIONALE: In the EOLIA (ECMO to Rescue Lung Injury in Severe ARDS) trial, oxygenation was similar between intervention and conventional groups, whereas [Formula: see text] e was reduced in the intervention group. Comparable reductions in ventilation intensity are theoretically possible with low-flow extracorporeal CO(2) removal (ECCO(2)R), provided oxygenation remains acceptable. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of ECCO(2)R and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and hemodynamics in animal models of pulmonary (intratracheal hydrochloric acid) and extrapulmonary (intravenous oleic acid) lung injury. METHODS: Twenty-four pigs with moderate to severe hypoxemia (Pa(O(2)):Fi(O(2)) ⩽ 150 mm Hg) were randomized to ECMO (blood flow 50–60 ml/kg/min), ECCO(2)R (0.4 L/min), or mechanical ventilation alone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: [Formula: see text] o(2), [Formula: see text] co(2), gas exchange, hemodynamics, and respiratory mechanics were measured and are presented as 24-hour averages. Oleic acid versus hydrochloric acid showed higher extravascular lung water (1,424 ± 419 vs. 574 ± 195 ml; P < 0.001), worse oxygenation (Pa(O(2)):Fi(O(2)) = 125 ± 14 vs. 151 ± 11 mm Hg; P < 0.001), but better respiratory mechanics (plateau pressure 27 ± 4 vs. 30 ± 3 cm H(2)O; P = 0.017). Both models led to acute severe pulmonary hypertension. In both models, ECMO (3.7 ± 0.5 L/min), compared with ECCO(2)R (0.4 L/min), increased mixed venous oxygen saturation and oxygenation, and improved hemodynamics (cardiac output = 6.0 ± 1.4 vs. 5.2 ± 1.4 L/min; P = 0.003). [Formula: see text] o(2) and [Formula: see text] co(2), irrespective of lung injury model, were lower during ECMO, resulting in lower Pa(CO(2)) and [Formula: see text] e but worse respiratory elastance compared with ECCO(2)R (64 ± 27 vs. 40 ± 8 cm H(2)O/L; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ECMO was associated with better oxygenation, lower [Formula: see text] o(2), and better hemodynamics. ECCO(2)R may offer a potential alternative to ECMO, but there are concerns regarding its effects on hemodynamics and pulmonary hypertension. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10161753 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Thoracic Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101617532023-05-06 High- versus Low-Flow Extracorporeal Respiratory Support in Experimental Hypoxemic Acute Lung Injury Brusatori, Serena Zinnato, Carmelo Busana, Mattia Romitti, Federica Gattarello, Simone Palumbo, Maria Michela Pozzi, Tommaso Steinberg, Irene Palermo, Paola Lazzari, Stefano Maj, Roberta Velati, Mara D’Albo, Rosanna Wassong, Jona Meissner, Killian Lombardo, Fabio Herrmann, Peter Quintel, Michael Moerer, Onnen Camporota, Luigi Marini, John J. Meissner, Konrad Gattinoni, Luciano Am J Respir Crit Care Med Original Articles RATIONALE: In the EOLIA (ECMO to Rescue Lung Injury in Severe ARDS) trial, oxygenation was similar between intervention and conventional groups, whereas [Formula: see text] e was reduced in the intervention group. Comparable reductions in ventilation intensity are theoretically possible with low-flow extracorporeal CO(2) removal (ECCO(2)R), provided oxygenation remains acceptable. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of ECCO(2)R and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and hemodynamics in animal models of pulmonary (intratracheal hydrochloric acid) and extrapulmonary (intravenous oleic acid) lung injury. METHODS: Twenty-four pigs with moderate to severe hypoxemia (Pa(O(2)):Fi(O(2)) ⩽ 150 mm Hg) were randomized to ECMO (blood flow 50–60 ml/kg/min), ECCO(2)R (0.4 L/min), or mechanical ventilation alone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: [Formula: see text] o(2), [Formula: see text] co(2), gas exchange, hemodynamics, and respiratory mechanics were measured and are presented as 24-hour averages. Oleic acid versus hydrochloric acid showed higher extravascular lung water (1,424 ± 419 vs. 574 ± 195 ml; P < 0.001), worse oxygenation (Pa(O(2)):Fi(O(2)) = 125 ± 14 vs. 151 ± 11 mm Hg; P < 0.001), but better respiratory mechanics (plateau pressure 27 ± 4 vs. 30 ± 3 cm H(2)O; P = 0.017). Both models led to acute severe pulmonary hypertension. In both models, ECMO (3.7 ± 0.5 L/min), compared with ECCO(2)R (0.4 L/min), increased mixed venous oxygen saturation and oxygenation, and improved hemodynamics (cardiac output = 6.0 ± 1.4 vs. 5.2 ± 1.4 L/min; P = 0.003). [Formula: see text] o(2) and [Formula: see text] co(2), irrespective of lung injury model, were lower during ECMO, resulting in lower Pa(CO(2)) and [Formula: see text] e but worse respiratory elastance compared with ECCO(2)R (64 ± 27 vs. 40 ± 8 cm H(2)O/L; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ECMO was associated with better oxygenation, lower [Formula: see text] o(2), and better hemodynamics. ECCO(2)R may offer a potential alternative to ECMO, but there are concerns regarding its effects on hemodynamics and pulmonary hypertension. American Thoracic Society 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10161753/ /pubmed/36848321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202212-2194OC Text en Copyright © 2023 by the American Thoracic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . For commercial usage and reprints, please e-mail Diane Gern (dgern@thoracic.org). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Brusatori, Serena Zinnato, Carmelo Busana, Mattia Romitti, Federica Gattarello, Simone Palumbo, Maria Michela Pozzi, Tommaso Steinberg, Irene Palermo, Paola Lazzari, Stefano Maj, Roberta Velati, Mara D’Albo, Rosanna Wassong, Jona Meissner, Killian Lombardo, Fabio Herrmann, Peter Quintel, Michael Moerer, Onnen Camporota, Luigi Marini, John J. Meissner, Konrad Gattinoni, Luciano High- versus Low-Flow Extracorporeal Respiratory Support in Experimental Hypoxemic Acute Lung Injury |
title | High- versus Low-Flow Extracorporeal Respiratory Support in Experimental Hypoxemic Acute Lung Injury |
title_full | High- versus Low-Flow Extracorporeal Respiratory Support in Experimental Hypoxemic Acute Lung Injury |
title_fullStr | High- versus Low-Flow Extracorporeal Respiratory Support in Experimental Hypoxemic Acute Lung Injury |
title_full_unstemmed | High- versus Low-Flow Extracorporeal Respiratory Support in Experimental Hypoxemic Acute Lung Injury |
title_short | High- versus Low-Flow Extracorporeal Respiratory Support in Experimental Hypoxemic Acute Lung Injury |
title_sort | high- versus low-flow extracorporeal respiratory support in experimental hypoxemic acute lung injury |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36848321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202212-2194OC |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brusatoriserena highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury AT zinnatocarmelo highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury AT busanamattia highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury AT romittifederica highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury AT gattarellosimone highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury AT palumbomariamichela highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury AT pozzitommaso highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury AT steinbergirene highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury AT palermopaola highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury AT lazzaristefano highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury AT majroberta highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury AT velatimara highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury AT dalborosanna highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury AT wassongjona highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury AT meissnerkillian highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury AT lombardofabio highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury AT herrmannpeter highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury AT quintelmichael highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury AT moereronnen highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury AT camporotaluigi highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury AT marinijohnj highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury AT meissnerkonrad highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury AT gattinoniluciano highversuslowflowextracorporealrespiratorysupportinexperimentalhypoxemicacutelunginjury |