Cargando…

Toxicity, quality of life, and PSA control after 50 Gy stereotactic body radiation therapy to the dominant intraprostatic nodule with the use of a rectal spacer: results of a phase I/II study

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a phase I/II prospective trial to determine whether stereotactic dose escalation to the dominant intra-prostatic nodule (DIN) up to 50 Gy incorporating a rectal balloon spacer is safe, does not affect patient quality of life, and preserves local control in patients with inte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cloitre, Minna, Valerio, Massimo, Mampuya, Ange, Rakauskas, Arnas, Berthold, Dominik, Tawadros, Thomas, Meuwly, Jean-Yves, Heym, Leonie, Duclos, Frederic, Vallet, Véronique, Zeverino, Michele, Jichlinski, Patrice, Prior, John, Roth, Beat, Bourhis, Jean, Herrera, Fernanda G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36745031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220803
_version_ 1785037594179928064
author Cloitre, Minna
Valerio, Massimo
Mampuya, Ange
Rakauskas, Arnas
Berthold, Dominik
Tawadros, Thomas
Meuwly, Jean-Yves
Heym, Leonie
Duclos, Frederic
Vallet, Véronique
Zeverino, Michele
Jichlinski, Patrice
Prior, John
Roth, Beat
Bourhis, Jean
Herrera, Fernanda G
author_facet Cloitre, Minna
Valerio, Massimo
Mampuya, Ange
Rakauskas, Arnas
Berthold, Dominik
Tawadros, Thomas
Meuwly, Jean-Yves
Heym, Leonie
Duclos, Frederic
Vallet, Véronique
Zeverino, Michele
Jichlinski, Patrice
Prior, John
Roth, Beat
Bourhis, Jean
Herrera, Fernanda G
author_sort Cloitre, Minna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We conducted a phase I/II prospective trial to determine whether stereotactic dose escalation to the dominant intra-prostatic nodule (DIN) up to 50 Gy incorporating a rectal balloon spacer is safe, does not affect patient quality of life, and preserves local control in patients with intermediate-high risk PCa. METHODS: Eligible patients included males with stage ≤T3b localized disease, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level ≤50 , International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≤14, and a gland volume ≤70 cm(3). Patients underwent perirectal spacer placement, followed by a planning MRI and were subsequently treated with SBRT doses of 36.25 Gy in five fractions to the whole prostate while simultaneously escalating doses to the magnetic resonance image visible DIN up to 50 Gy. Primary endpoint: safety. Secondary endpoints: biochemical control, quality of life (QofL), and dosimetry outcome. RESULTS: Nine patients were treated in the Phase I part of the study. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were not observed. Further characterization of tolerability and efficacy was conducted in the subsequent 24 patients irradiated at the recommended Phase II dose (50 Gy, RP2D). At a median follow-up of 61 months, biochemical control is 69%. Grade 1 and 2 acute GU and GI toxicity was 57.5 and 15%, and 24.2 and 6.1%, respectively. Grade 1 and 2 late GU and GI toxicity was 66.6 and 12.1%, and 15.1 and 3%, respectively. No Grade 3 or higher toxicity was reported. QofL data confirmed physician’s reported side effects. Dosimetry analysis showed adherence to the doses prescribed in the protocol. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT of the whole prostate with 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions and dose escalation to 50 Gy to the DIN, when combined with a peri-rectal balloon spacer, was tolerable and established the RP2D. QofL analysis showed minimal negative impact in GU, GI, and sexual domains. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Extreme hypofractionated prostate radiation therapy with focal dose escalation to the DIN is well tolerated with efficacy comparable to normal fractionated radiation therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10161910
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101619102023-05-06 Toxicity, quality of life, and PSA control after 50 Gy stereotactic body radiation therapy to the dominant intraprostatic nodule with the use of a rectal spacer: results of a phase I/II study Cloitre, Minna Valerio, Massimo Mampuya, Ange Rakauskas, Arnas Berthold, Dominik Tawadros, Thomas Meuwly, Jean-Yves Heym, Leonie Duclos, Frederic Vallet, Véronique Zeverino, Michele Jichlinski, Patrice Prior, John Roth, Beat Bourhis, Jean Herrera, Fernanda G Br J Radiol Full Paper OBJECTIVES: We conducted a phase I/II prospective trial to determine whether stereotactic dose escalation to the dominant intra-prostatic nodule (DIN) up to 50 Gy incorporating a rectal balloon spacer is safe, does not affect patient quality of life, and preserves local control in patients with intermediate-high risk PCa. METHODS: Eligible patients included males with stage ≤T3b localized disease, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level ≤50 , International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≤14, and a gland volume ≤70 cm(3). Patients underwent perirectal spacer placement, followed by a planning MRI and were subsequently treated with SBRT doses of 36.25 Gy in five fractions to the whole prostate while simultaneously escalating doses to the magnetic resonance image visible DIN up to 50 Gy. Primary endpoint: safety. Secondary endpoints: biochemical control, quality of life (QofL), and dosimetry outcome. RESULTS: Nine patients were treated in the Phase I part of the study. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were not observed. Further characterization of tolerability and efficacy was conducted in the subsequent 24 patients irradiated at the recommended Phase II dose (50 Gy, RP2D). At a median follow-up of 61 months, biochemical control is 69%. Grade 1 and 2 acute GU and GI toxicity was 57.5 and 15%, and 24.2 and 6.1%, respectively. Grade 1 and 2 late GU and GI toxicity was 66.6 and 12.1%, and 15.1 and 3%, respectively. No Grade 3 or higher toxicity was reported. QofL data confirmed physician’s reported side effects. Dosimetry analysis showed adherence to the doses prescribed in the protocol. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT of the whole prostate with 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions and dose escalation to 50 Gy to the DIN, when combined with a peri-rectal balloon spacer, was tolerable and established the RP2D. QofL analysis showed minimal negative impact in GU, GI, and sexual domains. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Extreme hypofractionated prostate radiation therapy with focal dose escalation to the DIN is well tolerated with efficacy comparable to normal fractionated radiation therapy. The British Institute of Radiology. 2023-05-01 2023-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10161910/ /pubmed/36745031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220803 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Full Paper
Cloitre, Minna
Valerio, Massimo
Mampuya, Ange
Rakauskas, Arnas
Berthold, Dominik
Tawadros, Thomas
Meuwly, Jean-Yves
Heym, Leonie
Duclos, Frederic
Vallet, Véronique
Zeverino, Michele
Jichlinski, Patrice
Prior, John
Roth, Beat
Bourhis, Jean
Herrera, Fernanda G
Toxicity, quality of life, and PSA control after 50 Gy stereotactic body radiation therapy to the dominant intraprostatic nodule with the use of a rectal spacer: results of a phase I/II study
title Toxicity, quality of life, and PSA control after 50 Gy stereotactic body radiation therapy to the dominant intraprostatic nodule with the use of a rectal spacer: results of a phase I/II study
title_full Toxicity, quality of life, and PSA control after 50 Gy stereotactic body radiation therapy to the dominant intraprostatic nodule with the use of a rectal spacer: results of a phase I/II study
title_fullStr Toxicity, quality of life, and PSA control after 50 Gy stereotactic body radiation therapy to the dominant intraprostatic nodule with the use of a rectal spacer: results of a phase I/II study
title_full_unstemmed Toxicity, quality of life, and PSA control after 50 Gy stereotactic body radiation therapy to the dominant intraprostatic nodule with the use of a rectal spacer: results of a phase I/II study
title_short Toxicity, quality of life, and PSA control after 50 Gy stereotactic body radiation therapy to the dominant intraprostatic nodule with the use of a rectal spacer: results of a phase I/II study
title_sort toxicity, quality of life, and psa control after 50 gy stereotactic body radiation therapy to the dominant intraprostatic nodule with the use of a rectal spacer: results of a phase i/ii study
topic Full Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36745031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220803
work_keys_str_mv AT cloitreminna toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy
AT valeriomassimo toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy
AT mampuyaange toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy
AT rakauskasarnas toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy
AT bertholddominik toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy
AT tawadrosthomas toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy
AT meuwlyjeanyves toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy
AT heymleonie toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy
AT duclosfrederic toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy
AT valletveronique toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy
AT zeverinomichele toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy
AT jichlinskipatrice toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy
AT priorjohn toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy
AT rothbeat toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy
AT bourhisjean toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy
AT herrerafernandag toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy