Cargando…
Toxicity, quality of life, and PSA control after 50 Gy stereotactic body radiation therapy to the dominant intraprostatic nodule with the use of a rectal spacer: results of a phase I/II study
OBJECTIVES: We conducted a phase I/II prospective trial to determine whether stereotactic dose escalation to the dominant intra-prostatic nodule (DIN) up to 50 Gy incorporating a rectal balloon spacer is safe, does not affect patient quality of life, and preserves local control in patients with inte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The British Institute of Radiology.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161910/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36745031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220803 |
_version_ | 1785037594179928064 |
---|---|
author | Cloitre, Minna Valerio, Massimo Mampuya, Ange Rakauskas, Arnas Berthold, Dominik Tawadros, Thomas Meuwly, Jean-Yves Heym, Leonie Duclos, Frederic Vallet, Véronique Zeverino, Michele Jichlinski, Patrice Prior, John Roth, Beat Bourhis, Jean Herrera, Fernanda G |
author_facet | Cloitre, Minna Valerio, Massimo Mampuya, Ange Rakauskas, Arnas Berthold, Dominik Tawadros, Thomas Meuwly, Jean-Yves Heym, Leonie Duclos, Frederic Vallet, Véronique Zeverino, Michele Jichlinski, Patrice Prior, John Roth, Beat Bourhis, Jean Herrera, Fernanda G |
author_sort | Cloitre, Minna |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: We conducted a phase I/II prospective trial to determine whether stereotactic dose escalation to the dominant intra-prostatic nodule (DIN) up to 50 Gy incorporating a rectal balloon spacer is safe, does not affect patient quality of life, and preserves local control in patients with intermediate-high risk PCa. METHODS: Eligible patients included males with stage ≤T3b localized disease, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level ≤50 , International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≤14, and a gland volume ≤70 cm(3). Patients underwent perirectal spacer placement, followed by a planning MRI and were subsequently treated with SBRT doses of 36.25 Gy in five fractions to the whole prostate while simultaneously escalating doses to the magnetic resonance image visible DIN up to 50 Gy. Primary endpoint: safety. Secondary endpoints: biochemical control, quality of life (QofL), and dosimetry outcome. RESULTS: Nine patients were treated in the Phase I part of the study. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were not observed. Further characterization of tolerability and efficacy was conducted in the subsequent 24 patients irradiated at the recommended Phase II dose (50 Gy, RP2D). At a median follow-up of 61 months, biochemical control is 69%. Grade 1 and 2 acute GU and GI toxicity was 57.5 and 15%, and 24.2 and 6.1%, respectively. Grade 1 and 2 late GU and GI toxicity was 66.6 and 12.1%, and 15.1 and 3%, respectively. No Grade 3 or higher toxicity was reported. QofL data confirmed physician’s reported side effects. Dosimetry analysis showed adherence to the doses prescribed in the protocol. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT of the whole prostate with 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions and dose escalation to 50 Gy to the DIN, when combined with a peri-rectal balloon spacer, was tolerable and established the RP2D. QofL analysis showed minimal negative impact in GU, GI, and sexual domains. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Extreme hypofractionated prostate radiation therapy with focal dose escalation to the DIN is well tolerated with efficacy comparable to normal fractionated radiation therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10161910 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The British Institute of Radiology. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101619102023-05-06 Toxicity, quality of life, and PSA control after 50 Gy stereotactic body radiation therapy to the dominant intraprostatic nodule with the use of a rectal spacer: results of a phase I/II study Cloitre, Minna Valerio, Massimo Mampuya, Ange Rakauskas, Arnas Berthold, Dominik Tawadros, Thomas Meuwly, Jean-Yves Heym, Leonie Duclos, Frederic Vallet, Véronique Zeverino, Michele Jichlinski, Patrice Prior, John Roth, Beat Bourhis, Jean Herrera, Fernanda G Br J Radiol Full Paper OBJECTIVES: We conducted a phase I/II prospective trial to determine whether stereotactic dose escalation to the dominant intra-prostatic nodule (DIN) up to 50 Gy incorporating a rectal balloon spacer is safe, does not affect patient quality of life, and preserves local control in patients with intermediate-high risk PCa. METHODS: Eligible patients included males with stage ≤T3b localized disease, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level ≤50 , International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≤14, and a gland volume ≤70 cm(3). Patients underwent perirectal spacer placement, followed by a planning MRI and were subsequently treated with SBRT doses of 36.25 Gy in five fractions to the whole prostate while simultaneously escalating doses to the magnetic resonance image visible DIN up to 50 Gy. Primary endpoint: safety. Secondary endpoints: biochemical control, quality of life (QofL), and dosimetry outcome. RESULTS: Nine patients were treated in the Phase I part of the study. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were not observed. Further characterization of tolerability and efficacy was conducted in the subsequent 24 patients irradiated at the recommended Phase II dose (50 Gy, RP2D). At a median follow-up of 61 months, biochemical control is 69%. Grade 1 and 2 acute GU and GI toxicity was 57.5 and 15%, and 24.2 and 6.1%, respectively. Grade 1 and 2 late GU and GI toxicity was 66.6 and 12.1%, and 15.1 and 3%, respectively. No Grade 3 or higher toxicity was reported. QofL data confirmed physician’s reported side effects. Dosimetry analysis showed adherence to the doses prescribed in the protocol. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT of the whole prostate with 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions and dose escalation to 50 Gy to the DIN, when combined with a peri-rectal balloon spacer, was tolerable and established the RP2D. QofL analysis showed minimal negative impact in GU, GI, and sexual domains. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Extreme hypofractionated prostate radiation therapy with focal dose escalation to the DIN is well tolerated with efficacy comparable to normal fractionated radiation therapy. The British Institute of Radiology. 2023-05-01 2023-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10161910/ /pubmed/36745031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220803 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Full Paper Cloitre, Minna Valerio, Massimo Mampuya, Ange Rakauskas, Arnas Berthold, Dominik Tawadros, Thomas Meuwly, Jean-Yves Heym, Leonie Duclos, Frederic Vallet, Véronique Zeverino, Michele Jichlinski, Patrice Prior, John Roth, Beat Bourhis, Jean Herrera, Fernanda G Toxicity, quality of life, and PSA control after 50 Gy stereotactic body radiation therapy to the dominant intraprostatic nodule with the use of a rectal spacer: results of a phase I/II study |
title | Toxicity, quality of life, and PSA control after 50 Gy stereotactic body radiation therapy to the dominant intraprostatic nodule with the use of a rectal spacer: results of a phase I/II study |
title_full | Toxicity, quality of life, and PSA control after 50 Gy stereotactic body radiation therapy to the dominant intraprostatic nodule with the use of a rectal spacer: results of a phase I/II study |
title_fullStr | Toxicity, quality of life, and PSA control after 50 Gy stereotactic body radiation therapy to the dominant intraprostatic nodule with the use of a rectal spacer: results of a phase I/II study |
title_full_unstemmed | Toxicity, quality of life, and PSA control after 50 Gy stereotactic body radiation therapy to the dominant intraprostatic nodule with the use of a rectal spacer: results of a phase I/II study |
title_short | Toxicity, quality of life, and PSA control after 50 Gy stereotactic body radiation therapy to the dominant intraprostatic nodule with the use of a rectal spacer: results of a phase I/II study |
title_sort | toxicity, quality of life, and psa control after 50 gy stereotactic body radiation therapy to the dominant intraprostatic nodule with the use of a rectal spacer: results of a phase i/ii study |
topic | Full Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161910/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36745031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220803 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cloitreminna toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy AT valeriomassimo toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy AT mampuyaange toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy AT rakauskasarnas toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy AT bertholddominik toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy AT tawadrosthomas toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy AT meuwlyjeanyves toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy AT heymleonie toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy AT duclosfrederic toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy AT valletveronique toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy AT zeverinomichele toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy AT jichlinskipatrice toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy AT priorjohn toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy AT rothbeat toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy AT bourhisjean toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy AT herrerafernandag toxicityqualityoflifeandpsacontrolafter50gystereotacticbodyradiationtherapytothedominantintraprostaticnodulewiththeuseofarectalspacerresultsofaphaseiiistudy |