Cargando…

Radiologists’ performance in reading digital breast tomosynthesis with and without synthesized views for cancer detection

OBJECTIVE: The study aims to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of radiologists and radiology trainees in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) alone vs DBT plus synthesized view (SV) for an understanding of the adequacy of DBT images to identify cancer lesions. METHODS: Fifty-five observers (30 radiolog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trieu, Phuong Dung (Yun), Noakes, Jennie, Li, Tong, Borecky, Natacha, Brennan, Patrick C, Barron, Melissa L, Lewis, Sarah J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36802348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220704
_version_ 1785037594679050240
author Trieu, Phuong Dung (Yun)
Noakes, Jennie
Li, Tong
Borecky, Natacha
Brennan, Patrick C
Barron, Melissa L
Lewis, Sarah J
author_facet Trieu, Phuong Dung (Yun)
Noakes, Jennie
Li, Tong
Borecky, Natacha
Brennan, Patrick C
Barron, Melissa L
Lewis, Sarah J
author_sort Trieu, Phuong Dung (Yun)
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The study aims to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of radiologists and radiology trainees in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) alone vs DBT plus synthesized view (SV) for an understanding of the adequacy of DBT images to identify cancer lesions. METHODS: Fifty-five observers (30 radiologists and 25 radiology trainees) participated in reading a set of 35 cases (15 cancer) with 28 readers reading DBT and 27 readers reading DBT plus SV. Two groups of readers had similar experience in interpreting mammograms. The performances of participants in each reading mode were compared with the ground truth and calculated in term of specificity, sensitivity, and ROC AUC. The cancer detection rate in various levels of breast density, lesion types and lesion sizes between ‘DBT’ and ‘DBT + SV’ were also analyzed. The difference in diagnostic accuracy of readers between two reading modes was assessed using Man–Whitney U test. p < 0.05 indicated a significant result. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in specificity (0.67-vs-0.65; p = 0.69), sensitivity (0.77-vs-0.71; p = 0.09), ROC AUC (0.77-vs-0.73; p = 0.19) of radiologists reading DBT plus SV compared with radiologists reading DBT. Similar result was found in radiology trainees with no significant difference in specificity (0.70-vs-0.63; p = 0.29), sensitivity (0.44-vs-0.55; p = 0.19), ROC AUC (0.59-vs-0.62; p = 0.60) between two reading modes. Radiologists and trainees obtained similar results in two reading modes for cancer detection rate with different levels of breast density, cancer types and sizes of lesions (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Findings show that the diagnostic performances of radiologists and radiology trainees in DBT alone and DBT plus SV were equivalent in identifying cancer and normal cases. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: DBT alone had equivalent diagnostic accuracy as DBT plus SV which could imply the consideration of using DBT as a sole modality without SV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10161913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101619132023-05-06 Radiologists’ performance in reading digital breast tomosynthesis with and without synthesized views for cancer detection Trieu, Phuong Dung (Yun) Noakes, Jennie Li, Tong Borecky, Natacha Brennan, Patrick C Barron, Melissa L Lewis, Sarah J Br J Radiol Full Paper OBJECTIVE: The study aims to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of radiologists and radiology trainees in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) alone vs DBT plus synthesized view (SV) for an understanding of the adequacy of DBT images to identify cancer lesions. METHODS: Fifty-five observers (30 radiologists and 25 radiology trainees) participated in reading a set of 35 cases (15 cancer) with 28 readers reading DBT and 27 readers reading DBT plus SV. Two groups of readers had similar experience in interpreting mammograms. The performances of participants in each reading mode were compared with the ground truth and calculated in term of specificity, sensitivity, and ROC AUC. The cancer detection rate in various levels of breast density, lesion types and lesion sizes between ‘DBT’ and ‘DBT + SV’ were also analyzed. The difference in diagnostic accuracy of readers between two reading modes was assessed using Man–Whitney U test. p < 0.05 indicated a significant result. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in specificity (0.67-vs-0.65; p = 0.69), sensitivity (0.77-vs-0.71; p = 0.09), ROC AUC (0.77-vs-0.73; p = 0.19) of radiologists reading DBT plus SV compared with radiologists reading DBT. Similar result was found in radiology trainees with no significant difference in specificity (0.70-vs-0.63; p = 0.29), sensitivity (0.44-vs-0.55; p = 0.19), ROC AUC (0.59-vs-0.62; p = 0.60) between two reading modes. Radiologists and trainees obtained similar results in two reading modes for cancer detection rate with different levels of breast density, cancer types and sizes of lesions (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Findings show that the diagnostic performances of radiologists and radiology trainees in DBT alone and DBT plus SV were equivalent in identifying cancer and normal cases. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: DBT alone had equivalent diagnostic accuracy as DBT plus SV which could imply the consideration of using DBT as a sole modality without SV. The British Institute of Radiology. 2023-05-01 2023-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10161913/ /pubmed/36802348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220704 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial reuse, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Full Paper
Trieu, Phuong Dung (Yun)
Noakes, Jennie
Li, Tong
Borecky, Natacha
Brennan, Patrick C
Barron, Melissa L
Lewis, Sarah J
Radiologists’ performance in reading digital breast tomosynthesis with and without synthesized views for cancer detection
title Radiologists’ performance in reading digital breast tomosynthesis with and without synthesized views for cancer detection
title_full Radiologists’ performance in reading digital breast tomosynthesis with and without synthesized views for cancer detection
title_fullStr Radiologists’ performance in reading digital breast tomosynthesis with and without synthesized views for cancer detection
title_full_unstemmed Radiologists’ performance in reading digital breast tomosynthesis with and without synthesized views for cancer detection
title_short Radiologists’ performance in reading digital breast tomosynthesis with and without synthesized views for cancer detection
title_sort radiologists’ performance in reading digital breast tomosynthesis with and without synthesized views for cancer detection
topic Full Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36802348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220704
work_keys_str_mv AT trieuphuongdungyun radiologistsperformanceinreadingdigitalbreasttomosynthesiswithandwithoutsynthesizedviewsforcancerdetection
AT noakesjennie radiologistsperformanceinreadingdigitalbreasttomosynthesiswithandwithoutsynthesizedviewsforcancerdetection
AT litong radiologistsperformanceinreadingdigitalbreasttomosynthesiswithandwithoutsynthesizedviewsforcancerdetection
AT boreckynatacha radiologistsperformanceinreadingdigitalbreasttomosynthesiswithandwithoutsynthesizedviewsforcancerdetection
AT brennanpatrickc radiologistsperformanceinreadingdigitalbreasttomosynthesiswithandwithoutsynthesizedviewsforcancerdetection
AT barronmelissal radiologistsperformanceinreadingdigitalbreasttomosynthesiswithandwithoutsynthesizedviewsforcancerdetection
AT lewissarahj radiologistsperformanceinreadingdigitalbreasttomosynthesiswithandwithoutsynthesizedviewsforcancerdetection