Cargando…

Evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice

Remote digital postoperative wound monitoring provides an opportunity to strengthen postoperative community care and minimise the burden of surgical-site infection (SSI). This study aimed to pilot a remote digital postoperative wound monitoring service and evaluate the readiness for implementation i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McLean, Kenneth A., Sgrò, Alessandro, Brown, Leo R., Buijs, Louis F., Daines, Luke, Potter, Mark A., Bouamrane, Matt-Mouley, Harrison, Ewen M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37147462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00824-9
_version_ 1785037608098725888
author McLean, Kenneth A.
Sgrò, Alessandro
Brown, Leo R.
Buijs, Louis F.
Daines, Luke
Potter, Mark A.
Bouamrane, Matt-Mouley
Harrison, Ewen M.
author_facet McLean, Kenneth A.
Sgrò, Alessandro
Brown, Leo R.
Buijs, Louis F.
Daines, Luke
Potter, Mark A.
Bouamrane, Matt-Mouley
Harrison, Ewen M.
author_sort McLean, Kenneth A.
collection PubMed
description Remote digital postoperative wound monitoring provides an opportunity to strengthen postoperative community care and minimise the burden of surgical-site infection (SSI). This study aimed to pilot a remote digital postoperative wound monitoring service and evaluate the readiness for implementation in routine clinical practice. This was a single-arm pilot implementational study of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring across two tertiary care hospitals in the UK (IDEAL stage 2b, clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05069103). Adults undergoing abdominal surgery were recruited and received a smartphone-delivered wound assessment tool for 30-days postoperatively. Patients received 30-day postoperative follow-up, including the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ). A thematic mixed-methods approach was used, according to the WHO framework for monitoring and evaluating digital health interventions. 200 patients were enroled, of whom 115 (57.5%) underwent emergency surgical procedures. Overall, the 30-day SSI rate was 16.5% (n = 33/200), with 72.7% (n = 24) diagnosed post-discharge. Usage of the intervention was 83.0% (n = 166/200), with subsequently 74.1% (n = 123/166) TUQ completion. There were no issues reported with feasibility of the technology, with the reliability (3.87, 95% CI: 3.73–4.00) and quality of the interface rated highly (4.18, 95%: 4.06–4.30). Patient acceptance was similarly high with regards to ease of use (4.51, 95% CI: 4.41–4.62), satisfaction (4.27, 95% CI: 4.13–4.41), and usefulness (4.07, 95% CI: 3.92–4.23). Despite the desire for more frequent and personalised interactions, the majority viewed the intervention as providing meaningful benefit over routine postoperative care. Remote digital postoperative wound monitoring successfully demonstrated readiness for implementation with regards to the technology, usability, and healthcare process improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10161985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101619852023-05-07 Evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice McLean, Kenneth A. Sgrò, Alessandro Brown, Leo R. Buijs, Louis F. Daines, Luke Potter, Mark A. Bouamrane, Matt-Mouley Harrison, Ewen M. NPJ Digit Med Article Remote digital postoperative wound monitoring provides an opportunity to strengthen postoperative community care and minimise the burden of surgical-site infection (SSI). This study aimed to pilot a remote digital postoperative wound monitoring service and evaluate the readiness for implementation in routine clinical practice. This was a single-arm pilot implementational study of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring across two tertiary care hospitals in the UK (IDEAL stage 2b, clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05069103). Adults undergoing abdominal surgery were recruited and received a smartphone-delivered wound assessment tool for 30-days postoperatively. Patients received 30-day postoperative follow-up, including the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ). A thematic mixed-methods approach was used, according to the WHO framework for monitoring and evaluating digital health interventions. 200 patients were enroled, of whom 115 (57.5%) underwent emergency surgical procedures. Overall, the 30-day SSI rate was 16.5% (n = 33/200), with 72.7% (n = 24) diagnosed post-discharge. Usage of the intervention was 83.0% (n = 166/200), with subsequently 74.1% (n = 123/166) TUQ completion. There were no issues reported with feasibility of the technology, with the reliability (3.87, 95% CI: 3.73–4.00) and quality of the interface rated highly (4.18, 95%: 4.06–4.30). Patient acceptance was similarly high with regards to ease of use (4.51, 95% CI: 4.41–4.62), satisfaction (4.27, 95% CI: 4.13–4.41), and usefulness (4.07, 95% CI: 3.92–4.23). Despite the desire for more frequent and personalised interactions, the majority viewed the intervention as providing meaningful benefit over routine postoperative care. Remote digital postoperative wound monitoring successfully demonstrated readiness for implementation with regards to the technology, usability, and healthcare process improvement. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10161985/ /pubmed/37147462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00824-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
McLean, Kenneth A.
Sgrò, Alessandro
Brown, Leo R.
Buijs, Louis F.
Daines, Luke
Potter, Mark A.
Bouamrane, Matt-Mouley
Harrison, Ewen M.
Evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice
title Evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice
title_full Evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice
title_fullStr Evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice
title_short Evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice
title_sort evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37147462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00824-9
work_keys_str_mv AT mcleankennetha evaluationofremotedigitalpostoperativewoundmonitoringinroutinesurgicalpractice
AT sgroalessandro evaluationofremotedigitalpostoperativewoundmonitoringinroutinesurgicalpractice
AT brownleor evaluationofremotedigitalpostoperativewoundmonitoringinroutinesurgicalpractice
AT buijslouisf evaluationofremotedigitalpostoperativewoundmonitoringinroutinesurgicalpractice
AT dainesluke evaluationofremotedigitalpostoperativewoundmonitoringinroutinesurgicalpractice
AT pottermarka evaluationofremotedigitalpostoperativewoundmonitoringinroutinesurgicalpractice
AT bouamranemattmouley evaluationofremotedigitalpostoperativewoundmonitoringinroutinesurgicalpractice
AT harrisonewenm evaluationofremotedigitalpostoperativewoundmonitoringinroutinesurgicalpractice