Cargando…
Evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice
Remote digital postoperative wound monitoring provides an opportunity to strengthen postoperative community care and minimise the burden of surgical-site infection (SSI). This study aimed to pilot a remote digital postoperative wound monitoring service and evaluate the readiness for implementation i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37147462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00824-9 |
_version_ | 1785037608098725888 |
---|---|
author | McLean, Kenneth A. Sgrò, Alessandro Brown, Leo R. Buijs, Louis F. Daines, Luke Potter, Mark A. Bouamrane, Matt-Mouley Harrison, Ewen M. |
author_facet | McLean, Kenneth A. Sgrò, Alessandro Brown, Leo R. Buijs, Louis F. Daines, Luke Potter, Mark A. Bouamrane, Matt-Mouley Harrison, Ewen M. |
author_sort | McLean, Kenneth A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Remote digital postoperative wound monitoring provides an opportunity to strengthen postoperative community care and minimise the burden of surgical-site infection (SSI). This study aimed to pilot a remote digital postoperative wound monitoring service and evaluate the readiness for implementation in routine clinical practice. This was a single-arm pilot implementational study of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring across two tertiary care hospitals in the UK (IDEAL stage 2b, clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05069103). Adults undergoing abdominal surgery were recruited and received a smartphone-delivered wound assessment tool for 30-days postoperatively. Patients received 30-day postoperative follow-up, including the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ). A thematic mixed-methods approach was used, according to the WHO framework for monitoring and evaluating digital health interventions. 200 patients were enroled, of whom 115 (57.5%) underwent emergency surgical procedures. Overall, the 30-day SSI rate was 16.5% (n = 33/200), with 72.7% (n = 24) diagnosed post-discharge. Usage of the intervention was 83.0% (n = 166/200), with subsequently 74.1% (n = 123/166) TUQ completion. There were no issues reported with feasibility of the technology, with the reliability (3.87, 95% CI: 3.73–4.00) and quality of the interface rated highly (4.18, 95%: 4.06–4.30). Patient acceptance was similarly high with regards to ease of use (4.51, 95% CI: 4.41–4.62), satisfaction (4.27, 95% CI: 4.13–4.41), and usefulness (4.07, 95% CI: 3.92–4.23). Despite the desire for more frequent and personalised interactions, the majority viewed the intervention as providing meaningful benefit over routine postoperative care. Remote digital postoperative wound monitoring successfully demonstrated readiness for implementation with regards to the technology, usability, and healthcare process improvement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10161985 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101619852023-05-07 Evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice McLean, Kenneth A. Sgrò, Alessandro Brown, Leo R. Buijs, Louis F. Daines, Luke Potter, Mark A. Bouamrane, Matt-Mouley Harrison, Ewen M. NPJ Digit Med Article Remote digital postoperative wound monitoring provides an opportunity to strengthen postoperative community care and minimise the burden of surgical-site infection (SSI). This study aimed to pilot a remote digital postoperative wound monitoring service and evaluate the readiness for implementation in routine clinical practice. This was a single-arm pilot implementational study of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring across two tertiary care hospitals in the UK (IDEAL stage 2b, clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05069103). Adults undergoing abdominal surgery were recruited and received a smartphone-delivered wound assessment tool for 30-days postoperatively. Patients received 30-day postoperative follow-up, including the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ). A thematic mixed-methods approach was used, according to the WHO framework for monitoring and evaluating digital health interventions. 200 patients were enroled, of whom 115 (57.5%) underwent emergency surgical procedures. Overall, the 30-day SSI rate was 16.5% (n = 33/200), with 72.7% (n = 24) diagnosed post-discharge. Usage of the intervention was 83.0% (n = 166/200), with subsequently 74.1% (n = 123/166) TUQ completion. There were no issues reported with feasibility of the technology, with the reliability (3.87, 95% CI: 3.73–4.00) and quality of the interface rated highly (4.18, 95%: 4.06–4.30). Patient acceptance was similarly high with regards to ease of use (4.51, 95% CI: 4.41–4.62), satisfaction (4.27, 95% CI: 4.13–4.41), and usefulness (4.07, 95% CI: 3.92–4.23). Despite the desire for more frequent and personalised interactions, the majority viewed the intervention as providing meaningful benefit over routine postoperative care. Remote digital postoperative wound monitoring successfully demonstrated readiness for implementation with regards to the technology, usability, and healthcare process improvement. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10161985/ /pubmed/37147462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00824-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article McLean, Kenneth A. Sgrò, Alessandro Brown, Leo R. Buijs, Louis F. Daines, Luke Potter, Mark A. Bouamrane, Matt-Mouley Harrison, Ewen M. Evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice |
title | Evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice |
title_full | Evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice |
title_short | Evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice |
title_sort | evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37147462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00824-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcleankennetha evaluationofremotedigitalpostoperativewoundmonitoringinroutinesurgicalpractice AT sgroalessandro evaluationofremotedigitalpostoperativewoundmonitoringinroutinesurgicalpractice AT brownleor evaluationofremotedigitalpostoperativewoundmonitoringinroutinesurgicalpractice AT buijslouisf evaluationofremotedigitalpostoperativewoundmonitoringinroutinesurgicalpractice AT dainesluke evaluationofremotedigitalpostoperativewoundmonitoringinroutinesurgicalpractice AT pottermarka evaluationofremotedigitalpostoperativewoundmonitoringinroutinesurgicalpractice AT bouamranemattmouley evaluationofremotedigitalpostoperativewoundmonitoringinroutinesurgicalpractice AT harrisonewenm evaluationofremotedigitalpostoperativewoundmonitoringinroutinesurgicalpractice |