Cargando…

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT): a review of clinical outcomes—what is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation?

Modern conformal radiation therapy using techniques such as modulation, image guidance and motion management have changed the face of radiotherapy today offering superior conformity, efficiency, and reproducibility to clinics worldwide. This review assesses the impact of these advanced radiotherapy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hunte, Sherisse Ornella, Clark, Catharine H, Zyuzikov, Nikolay, Nisbet, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10162061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35616646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20201289
_version_ 1785037623066099712
author Hunte, Sherisse Ornella
Clark, Catharine H
Zyuzikov, Nikolay
Nisbet, Andrew
author_facet Hunte, Sherisse Ornella
Clark, Catharine H
Zyuzikov, Nikolay
Nisbet, Andrew
author_sort Hunte, Sherisse Ornella
collection PubMed
description Modern conformal radiation therapy using techniques such as modulation, image guidance and motion management have changed the face of radiotherapy today offering superior conformity, efficiency, and reproducibility to clinics worldwide. This review assesses the impact of these advanced radiotherapy techniques on patient toxicity and survival rates reported from January 2017 to September 2020. The main aims are to establish if dosimetric and efficiency gains correlate with improved survival and reduced toxicities and to answer the question ‘What is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation of VMAT?’. Compared with 3DCRT, improvements have been reported with VMAT in prostate, locally advanced cervical carcinoma and various head and neck applications, leading to the shift in technology to VMAT. Other sites such as thoracic neoplasms and nasopharyngeal carcinomas have observed some improvement with VMAT although not in line with improved dosimetric measures, and the burden of toxicity and the incidence of cancer related deaths remain high, signaling the need to further mitigate toxicity and increase survival. As technological advancement continues, large randomised long-term clinical trials are required to determine the way-forward and offer site-specific recommendations. These studies are usually expensive and time consuming, therefore utilising pooled real-world data in a prospective nature can be an alternative solution to comprehensively assess the efficacy of modern radiotherapy techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10162061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101620612023-05-06 Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT): a review of clinical outcomes—what is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation? Hunte, Sherisse Ornella Clark, Catharine H Zyuzikov, Nikolay Nisbet, Andrew Br J Radiol Review Article Modern conformal radiation therapy using techniques such as modulation, image guidance and motion management have changed the face of radiotherapy today offering superior conformity, efficiency, and reproducibility to clinics worldwide. This review assesses the impact of these advanced radiotherapy techniques on patient toxicity and survival rates reported from January 2017 to September 2020. The main aims are to establish if dosimetric and efficiency gains correlate with improved survival and reduced toxicities and to answer the question ‘What is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation of VMAT?’. Compared with 3DCRT, improvements have been reported with VMAT in prostate, locally advanced cervical carcinoma and various head and neck applications, leading to the shift in technology to VMAT. Other sites such as thoracic neoplasms and nasopharyngeal carcinomas have observed some improvement with VMAT although not in line with improved dosimetric measures, and the burden of toxicity and the incidence of cancer related deaths remain high, signaling the need to further mitigate toxicity and increase survival. As technological advancement continues, large randomised long-term clinical trials are required to determine the way-forward and offer site-specific recommendations. These studies are usually expensive and time consuming, therefore utilising pooled real-world data in a prospective nature can be an alternative solution to comprehensively assess the efficacy of modern radiotherapy techniques. The British Institute of Radiology. 2022-09 2022-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10162061/ /pubmed/35616646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20201289 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Hunte, Sherisse Ornella
Clark, Catharine H
Zyuzikov, Nikolay
Nisbet, Andrew
Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT): a review of clinical outcomes—what is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation?
title Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT): a review of clinical outcomes—what is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation?
title_full Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT): a review of clinical outcomes—what is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation?
title_fullStr Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT): a review of clinical outcomes—what is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation?
title_full_unstemmed Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT): a review of clinical outcomes—what is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation?
title_short Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT): a review of clinical outcomes—what is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation?
title_sort volumetric modulated arc therapy (vmat): a review of clinical outcomes—what is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation?
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10162061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35616646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20201289
work_keys_str_mv AT huntesherisseornella volumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatareviewofclinicaloutcomeswhatistheclinicalevidenceforthemosteffectiveimplementation
AT clarkcatharineh volumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatareviewofclinicaloutcomeswhatistheclinicalevidenceforthemosteffectiveimplementation
AT zyuzikovnikolay volumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatareviewofclinicaloutcomeswhatistheclinicalevidenceforthemosteffectiveimplementation
AT nisbetandrew volumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatareviewofclinicaloutcomeswhatistheclinicalevidenceforthemosteffectiveimplementation