Cargando…
Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT): a review of clinical outcomes—what is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation?
Modern conformal radiation therapy using techniques such as modulation, image guidance and motion management have changed the face of radiotherapy today offering superior conformity, efficiency, and reproducibility to clinics worldwide. This review assesses the impact of these advanced radiotherapy...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The British Institute of Radiology.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10162061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35616646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20201289 |
_version_ | 1785037623066099712 |
---|---|
author | Hunte, Sherisse Ornella Clark, Catharine H Zyuzikov, Nikolay Nisbet, Andrew |
author_facet | Hunte, Sherisse Ornella Clark, Catharine H Zyuzikov, Nikolay Nisbet, Andrew |
author_sort | Hunte, Sherisse Ornella |
collection | PubMed |
description | Modern conformal radiation therapy using techniques such as modulation, image guidance and motion management have changed the face of radiotherapy today offering superior conformity, efficiency, and reproducibility to clinics worldwide. This review assesses the impact of these advanced radiotherapy techniques on patient toxicity and survival rates reported from January 2017 to September 2020. The main aims are to establish if dosimetric and efficiency gains correlate with improved survival and reduced toxicities and to answer the question ‘What is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation of VMAT?’. Compared with 3DCRT, improvements have been reported with VMAT in prostate, locally advanced cervical carcinoma and various head and neck applications, leading to the shift in technology to VMAT. Other sites such as thoracic neoplasms and nasopharyngeal carcinomas have observed some improvement with VMAT although not in line with improved dosimetric measures, and the burden of toxicity and the incidence of cancer related deaths remain high, signaling the need to further mitigate toxicity and increase survival. As technological advancement continues, large randomised long-term clinical trials are required to determine the way-forward and offer site-specific recommendations. These studies are usually expensive and time consuming, therefore utilising pooled real-world data in a prospective nature can be an alternative solution to comprehensively assess the efficacy of modern radiotherapy techniques. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10162061 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The British Institute of Radiology. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101620612023-05-06 Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT): a review of clinical outcomes—what is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation? Hunte, Sherisse Ornella Clark, Catharine H Zyuzikov, Nikolay Nisbet, Andrew Br J Radiol Review Article Modern conformal radiation therapy using techniques such as modulation, image guidance and motion management have changed the face of radiotherapy today offering superior conformity, efficiency, and reproducibility to clinics worldwide. This review assesses the impact of these advanced radiotherapy techniques on patient toxicity and survival rates reported from January 2017 to September 2020. The main aims are to establish if dosimetric and efficiency gains correlate with improved survival and reduced toxicities and to answer the question ‘What is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation of VMAT?’. Compared with 3DCRT, improvements have been reported with VMAT in prostate, locally advanced cervical carcinoma and various head and neck applications, leading to the shift in technology to VMAT. Other sites such as thoracic neoplasms and nasopharyngeal carcinomas have observed some improvement with VMAT although not in line with improved dosimetric measures, and the burden of toxicity and the incidence of cancer related deaths remain high, signaling the need to further mitigate toxicity and increase survival. As technological advancement continues, large randomised long-term clinical trials are required to determine the way-forward and offer site-specific recommendations. These studies are usually expensive and time consuming, therefore utilising pooled real-world data in a prospective nature can be an alternative solution to comprehensively assess the efficacy of modern radiotherapy techniques. The British Institute of Radiology. 2022-09 2022-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10162061/ /pubmed/35616646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20201289 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Hunte, Sherisse Ornella Clark, Catharine H Zyuzikov, Nikolay Nisbet, Andrew Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT): a review of clinical outcomes—what is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation? |
title | Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT): a review of clinical outcomes—what is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation? |
title_full | Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT): a review of clinical outcomes—what is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation? |
title_fullStr | Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT): a review of clinical outcomes—what is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation? |
title_full_unstemmed | Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT): a review of clinical outcomes—what is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation? |
title_short | Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT): a review of clinical outcomes—what is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation? |
title_sort | volumetric modulated arc therapy (vmat): a review of clinical outcomes—what is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation? |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10162061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35616646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20201289 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huntesherisseornella volumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatareviewofclinicaloutcomeswhatistheclinicalevidenceforthemosteffectiveimplementation AT clarkcatharineh volumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatareviewofclinicaloutcomeswhatistheclinicalevidenceforthemosteffectiveimplementation AT zyuzikovnikolay volumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatareviewofclinicaloutcomeswhatistheclinicalevidenceforthemosteffectiveimplementation AT nisbetandrew volumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatareviewofclinicaloutcomeswhatistheclinicalevidenceforthemosteffectiveimplementation |