Cargando…

Content validity of the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire (SRS-22r): A qualitative concept elicitation study

INTRODUCTION: Scoliosis Research Society-22 revised (SRS-22r) is the common questionnaire used to evaluate health related quality of life (HRQOL) for young people with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The aim of this study is to evaluate its content validity for this population. METHODS: In-de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alamrani, Samia, Gardner, Adrian, Falla, Deborah, Russell, Emily, Rushton, Alison B., Heneghan, Nicola R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10162511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37146069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285538
_version_ 1785037709101760512
author Alamrani, Samia
Gardner, Adrian
Falla, Deborah
Russell, Emily
Rushton, Alison B.
Heneghan, Nicola R.
author_facet Alamrani, Samia
Gardner, Adrian
Falla, Deborah
Russell, Emily
Rushton, Alison B.
Heneghan, Nicola R.
author_sort Alamrani, Samia
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Scoliosis Research Society-22 revised (SRS-22r) is the common questionnaire used to evaluate health related quality of life (HRQOL) for young people with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The aim of this study is to evaluate its content validity for this population. METHODS: In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of young people with AIS (Cobb angle ≥25˚, aged 10–18 years). Concept elicitation was used to evaluate the influence of AIS on participants’ HRQOL. Participant information sheets and consent/assent forms were age relevant. Topic guide was informed by the SRS-22r and existing evidence. Interviews were audio and video recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded, and analysed using thematic analysis. Derived themes/codes were compared with SRS-22r contents (domains/items). RESULTS: Eleven participants (mean age 14.9 years [SD = 1.8]; 8 female) were recruited. The mean curve size was 47.5° [SD = 18°] and participants had been managed via different approaches. Four main themes emerged with associated subthemes: 1) Physical effects related to physical symptoms (back hurt, stiffness) and body asymmetry (uneven shoulders), 2) Activity-related effects showed impact on mobility (sitting for long periods), self-care (dressing), and school activities (focus during lessons), 3) Psychological effects revealed emotional (feel worried), mental (sleep quality), and body image effects (hide back from others), 4) Social effects (participation in school and leisure activities), and school, friends and mental health support. A weak association was found between items of the SRS-22r and the identified codes. CONCLUSION: The SRS-22r does not adequately capture important concepts that relate to HRQOL of adolescents with AIS. These findings support revision of the SRS-22r, or the development of a new patient reported outcome measure to evaluate HRQOL of adolescents with AIS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10162511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101625112023-05-06 Content validity of the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire (SRS-22r): A qualitative concept elicitation study Alamrani, Samia Gardner, Adrian Falla, Deborah Russell, Emily Rushton, Alison B. Heneghan, Nicola R. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Scoliosis Research Society-22 revised (SRS-22r) is the common questionnaire used to evaluate health related quality of life (HRQOL) for young people with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The aim of this study is to evaluate its content validity for this population. METHODS: In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of young people with AIS (Cobb angle ≥25˚, aged 10–18 years). Concept elicitation was used to evaluate the influence of AIS on participants’ HRQOL. Participant information sheets and consent/assent forms were age relevant. Topic guide was informed by the SRS-22r and existing evidence. Interviews were audio and video recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded, and analysed using thematic analysis. Derived themes/codes were compared with SRS-22r contents (domains/items). RESULTS: Eleven participants (mean age 14.9 years [SD = 1.8]; 8 female) were recruited. The mean curve size was 47.5° [SD = 18°] and participants had been managed via different approaches. Four main themes emerged with associated subthemes: 1) Physical effects related to physical symptoms (back hurt, stiffness) and body asymmetry (uneven shoulders), 2) Activity-related effects showed impact on mobility (sitting for long periods), self-care (dressing), and school activities (focus during lessons), 3) Psychological effects revealed emotional (feel worried), mental (sleep quality), and body image effects (hide back from others), 4) Social effects (participation in school and leisure activities), and school, friends and mental health support. A weak association was found between items of the SRS-22r and the identified codes. CONCLUSION: The SRS-22r does not adequately capture important concepts that relate to HRQOL of adolescents with AIS. These findings support revision of the SRS-22r, or the development of a new patient reported outcome measure to evaluate HRQOL of adolescents with AIS. Public Library of Science 2023-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10162511/ /pubmed/37146069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285538 Text en © 2023 Alamrani et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Alamrani, Samia
Gardner, Adrian
Falla, Deborah
Russell, Emily
Rushton, Alison B.
Heneghan, Nicola R.
Content validity of the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire (SRS-22r): A qualitative concept elicitation study
title Content validity of the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire (SRS-22r): A qualitative concept elicitation study
title_full Content validity of the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire (SRS-22r): A qualitative concept elicitation study
title_fullStr Content validity of the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire (SRS-22r): A qualitative concept elicitation study
title_full_unstemmed Content validity of the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire (SRS-22r): A qualitative concept elicitation study
title_short Content validity of the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire (SRS-22r): A qualitative concept elicitation study
title_sort content validity of the scoliosis research society questionnaire (srs-22r): a qualitative concept elicitation study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10162511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37146069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285538
work_keys_str_mv AT alamranisamia contentvalidityofthescoliosisresearchsocietyquestionnairesrs22raqualitativeconceptelicitationstudy
AT gardneradrian contentvalidityofthescoliosisresearchsocietyquestionnairesrs22raqualitativeconceptelicitationstudy
AT falladeborah contentvalidityofthescoliosisresearchsocietyquestionnairesrs22raqualitativeconceptelicitationstudy
AT russellemily contentvalidityofthescoliosisresearchsocietyquestionnairesrs22raqualitativeconceptelicitationstudy
AT rushtonalisonb contentvalidityofthescoliosisresearchsocietyquestionnairesrs22raqualitativeconceptelicitationstudy
AT heneghannicolar contentvalidityofthescoliosisresearchsocietyquestionnairesrs22raqualitativeconceptelicitationstudy