Cargando…

Machine Learning–Based Prognostic Model for Patients After Lung Transplantation

IMPORTANCE: Although numerous prognostic factors have been found for patients after lung transplantation (LTx) over the years, an accurate prognostic tool for LTx recipients remains unavailable. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a prognostic model for predicting overall survival in patients after L...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tian, Dong, Yan, Hao-Ji, Huang, Heng, Zuo, Yu-Jie, Liu, Ming-Zhao, Zhao, Jin, Wu, Bo, Shi, Ling-Zhi, Chen, Jing-Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10163387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37145595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.12022
_version_ 1785037875088195584
author Tian, Dong
Yan, Hao-Ji
Huang, Heng
Zuo, Yu-Jie
Liu, Ming-Zhao
Zhao, Jin
Wu, Bo
Shi, Ling-Zhi
Chen, Jing-Yu
author_facet Tian, Dong
Yan, Hao-Ji
Huang, Heng
Zuo, Yu-Jie
Liu, Ming-Zhao
Zhao, Jin
Wu, Bo
Shi, Ling-Zhi
Chen, Jing-Yu
author_sort Tian, Dong
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Although numerous prognostic factors have been found for patients after lung transplantation (LTx) over the years, an accurate prognostic tool for LTx recipients remains unavailable. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a prognostic model for predicting overall survival in patients after LTx using random survival forests (RSF), a machine learning algorithm. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective prognostic study included patients who underwent LTx between January 2017 and December 2020. The LTx recipients were randomly assigned to training and test sets in accordance with a ratio of 7:3. Feature selection was performed using variable importance with bootstrapping resampling. The prognostic model was fitted using the RSF algorithm, and a Cox regression model was set as a benchmark. The integrated area under the curve (iAUC) and integrated Brier score (iBS) were applied to assess model performance in the test set. Data were analyzed from January 2017 to December 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Overall survival in patients after LTx. RESULTS: A total of 504 patients were eligible for this study, consisting of 353 patients in the training set (mean [SD] age, 55.03 [12.78] years; 235 [66.6%] male patients) and 151 patients in the test set (mean [SD] age, 56.79 [10.95] years; 99 [65.6%] male patients). According to the variable importance of each factor, 16 were selected for the final RSF model, and postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation time was identified as the most valuable factor. The RSF model had excellent performance with an iAUC of 0.879 (95% CI, 0.832-0.921) and an iBS of 0.130 (95% CI, 0.106-0.154). The Cox regression model fitted by the same modeling factors to the RSF model was significantly inferior to the RSF model with an iAUC of 0.658 (95% CI, 0.572-0.747; P < .001) and an iBS of 0.205 (95% CI, 0.176-0.233; P < .001). According to the RSF model predictions, the patients after LTx were stratified into 2 prognostic groups displaying significant difference, with mean overall survival of 52.91 months (95% CI, 48.51-57.32) and 14.83 months (95% CI, 9.44-20.22; log-rank P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this prognostic study, the findings first demonstrated that RSF could provide more accurate overall survival prediction and remarkable prognostic stratification than the Cox regression model for patients after LTx.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10163387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101633872023-05-07 Machine Learning–Based Prognostic Model for Patients After Lung Transplantation Tian, Dong Yan, Hao-Ji Huang, Heng Zuo, Yu-Jie Liu, Ming-Zhao Zhao, Jin Wu, Bo Shi, Ling-Zhi Chen, Jing-Yu JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Although numerous prognostic factors have been found for patients after lung transplantation (LTx) over the years, an accurate prognostic tool for LTx recipients remains unavailable. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a prognostic model for predicting overall survival in patients after LTx using random survival forests (RSF), a machine learning algorithm. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective prognostic study included patients who underwent LTx between January 2017 and December 2020. The LTx recipients were randomly assigned to training and test sets in accordance with a ratio of 7:3. Feature selection was performed using variable importance with bootstrapping resampling. The prognostic model was fitted using the RSF algorithm, and a Cox regression model was set as a benchmark. The integrated area under the curve (iAUC) and integrated Brier score (iBS) were applied to assess model performance in the test set. Data were analyzed from January 2017 to December 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Overall survival in patients after LTx. RESULTS: A total of 504 patients were eligible for this study, consisting of 353 patients in the training set (mean [SD] age, 55.03 [12.78] years; 235 [66.6%] male patients) and 151 patients in the test set (mean [SD] age, 56.79 [10.95] years; 99 [65.6%] male patients). According to the variable importance of each factor, 16 were selected for the final RSF model, and postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation time was identified as the most valuable factor. The RSF model had excellent performance with an iAUC of 0.879 (95% CI, 0.832-0.921) and an iBS of 0.130 (95% CI, 0.106-0.154). The Cox regression model fitted by the same modeling factors to the RSF model was significantly inferior to the RSF model with an iAUC of 0.658 (95% CI, 0.572-0.747; P < .001) and an iBS of 0.205 (95% CI, 0.176-0.233; P < .001). According to the RSF model predictions, the patients after LTx were stratified into 2 prognostic groups displaying significant difference, with mean overall survival of 52.91 months (95% CI, 48.51-57.32) and 14.83 months (95% CI, 9.44-20.22; log-rank P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this prognostic study, the findings first demonstrated that RSF could provide more accurate overall survival prediction and remarkable prognostic stratification than the Cox regression model for patients after LTx. American Medical Association 2023-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10163387/ /pubmed/37145595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.12022 Text en Copyright 2023 Tian D et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Tian, Dong
Yan, Hao-Ji
Huang, Heng
Zuo, Yu-Jie
Liu, Ming-Zhao
Zhao, Jin
Wu, Bo
Shi, Ling-Zhi
Chen, Jing-Yu
Machine Learning–Based Prognostic Model for Patients After Lung Transplantation
title Machine Learning–Based Prognostic Model for Patients After Lung Transplantation
title_full Machine Learning–Based Prognostic Model for Patients After Lung Transplantation
title_fullStr Machine Learning–Based Prognostic Model for Patients After Lung Transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning–Based Prognostic Model for Patients After Lung Transplantation
title_short Machine Learning–Based Prognostic Model for Patients After Lung Transplantation
title_sort machine learning–based prognostic model for patients after lung transplantation
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10163387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37145595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.12022
work_keys_str_mv AT tiandong machinelearningbasedprognosticmodelforpatientsafterlungtransplantation
AT yanhaoji machinelearningbasedprognosticmodelforpatientsafterlungtransplantation
AT huangheng machinelearningbasedprognosticmodelforpatientsafterlungtransplantation
AT zuoyujie machinelearningbasedprognosticmodelforpatientsafterlungtransplantation
AT liumingzhao machinelearningbasedprognosticmodelforpatientsafterlungtransplantation
AT zhaojin machinelearningbasedprognosticmodelforpatientsafterlungtransplantation
AT wubo machinelearningbasedprognosticmodelforpatientsafterlungtransplantation
AT shilingzhi machinelearningbasedprognosticmodelforpatientsafterlungtransplantation
AT chenjingyu machinelearningbasedprognosticmodelforpatientsafterlungtransplantation