Cargando…

Holistic needs assessment in outpatient cancer care: a randomised controlled trial

DESIGN: Analyst blinded, parallel, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial (RCT). PARTICIPANTS: People with confirmed diagnoses of cancer (head and neck, skin or colorectal) attending follow-up consultation 3 months post-treatment between 2015 and 2020. INTERVENTION: Holistic needs assessment (HNA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Snowden, Austyn, Young, Jenny, Roberge, Denis, Schipani, Stefano, Murray, Esther, Richard, Claude, Lussier, Marie-Therese, White, Craig
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10163480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37142317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066829
_version_ 1785037890819981312
author Snowden, Austyn
Young, Jenny
Roberge, Denis
Schipani, Stefano
Murray, Esther
Richard, Claude
Lussier, Marie-Therese
White, Craig
author_facet Snowden, Austyn
Young, Jenny
Roberge, Denis
Schipani, Stefano
Murray, Esther
Richard, Claude
Lussier, Marie-Therese
White, Craig
author_sort Snowden, Austyn
collection PubMed
description DESIGN: Analyst blinded, parallel, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial (RCT). PARTICIPANTS: People with confirmed diagnoses of cancer (head and neck, skin or colorectal) attending follow-up consultation 3 months post-treatment between 2015 and 2020. INTERVENTION: Holistic needs assessment (HNA) or care as usual during consultation. OBJECTIVE: To establish whether incorporating HNA into consultations would increase patient participation, shared decision making and postconsultation self-efficacy. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient participation in the consultations examined was measured using (a) dialogue ratio (DR) and (b) the proportion of consultation initiated by patient. Shared decision making was measured with CollaboRATE and self-efficacy with Lorig Scale. Consultations were audio recorded and timed. RANDOMISATION: Block randomisation. BLINDING: Audio recording analyst was blinded to study group. RESULTS: 147 patients were randomised: 74 control versus 73 intervention. OUTCOME: No statistically significant differences were found between groups for DR, patient initiative, self-efficacy or shared decision making. Consultations were on average 1 min 46 s longer in the HNA group (respectively, 17 m 25 s vs 15 min 39 s). CONCLUSION: HNA did not change the amount of conversation initiated by the patient or the level of dialogue within the consultation. HNA did not change patient sense of collaboration or feelings of self-efficacy afterwards. HNA group raised more concerns and proportionally more emotional concerns, although their consultations took longer than treatment as usual. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This is the first RCT to test HNA in medically led outpatient settings. Results showed no difference in the way the consultations were structured or received. There is wider evidence to support the roll out of HNA as part of a proactive, multidisciplinary process, but this study did not support medical colleagues facilitating it. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02274701.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10163480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101634802023-05-07 Holistic needs assessment in outpatient cancer care: a randomised controlled trial Snowden, Austyn Young, Jenny Roberge, Denis Schipani, Stefano Murray, Esther Richard, Claude Lussier, Marie-Therese White, Craig BMJ Open Oncology DESIGN: Analyst blinded, parallel, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial (RCT). PARTICIPANTS: People with confirmed diagnoses of cancer (head and neck, skin or colorectal) attending follow-up consultation 3 months post-treatment between 2015 and 2020. INTERVENTION: Holistic needs assessment (HNA) or care as usual during consultation. OBJECTIVE: To establish whether incorporating HNA into consultations would increase patient participation, shared decision making and postconsultation self-efficacy. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient participation in the consultations examined was measured using (a) dialogue ratio (DR) and (b) the proportion of consultation initiated by patient. Shared decision making was measured with CollaboRATE and self-efficacy with Lorig Scale. Consultations were audio recorded and timed. RANDOMISATION: Block randomisation. BLINDING: Audio recording analyst was blinded to study group. RESULTS: 147 patients were randomised: 74 control versus 73 intervention. OUTCOME: No statistically significant differences were found between groups for DR, patient initiative, self-efficacy or shared decision making. Consultations were on average 1 min 46 s longer in the HNA group (respectively, 17 m 25 s vs 15 min 39 s). CONCLUSION: HNA did not change the amount of conversation initiated by the patient or the level of dialogue within the consultation. HNA did not change patient sense of collaboration or feelings of self-efficacy afterwards. HNA group raised more concerns and proportionally more emotional concerns, although their consultations took longer than treatment as usual. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This is the first RCT to test HNA in medically led outpatient settings. Results showed no difference in the way the consultations were structured or received. There is wider evidence to support the roll out of HNA as part of a proactive, multidisciplinary process, but this study did not support medical colleagues facilitating it. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02274701. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10163480/ /pubmed/37142317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066829 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Oncology
Snowden, Austyn
Young, Jenny
Roberge, Denis
Schipani, Stefano
Murray, Esther
Richard, Claude
Lussier, Marie-Therese
White, Craig
Holistic needs assessment in outpatient cancer care: a randomised controlled trial
title Holistic needs assessment in outpatient cancer care: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Holistic needs assessment in outpatient cancer care: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Holistic needs assessment in outpatient cancer care: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Holistic needs assessment in outpatient cancer care: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Holistic needs assessment in outpatient cancer care: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort holistic needs assessment in outpatient cancer care: a randomised controlled trial
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10163480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37142317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066829
work_keys_str_mv AT snowdenaustyn holisticneedsassessmentinoutpatientcancercarearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT youngjenny holisticneedsassessmentinoutpatientcancercarearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT robergedenis holisticneedsassessmentinoutpatientcancercarearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schipanistefano holisticneedsassessmentinoutpatientcancercarearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT murrayesther holisticneedsassessmentinoutpatientcancercarearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT richardclaude holisticneedsassessmentinoutpatientcancercarearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lussiermarietherese holisticneedsassessmentinoutpatientcancercarearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT whitecraig holisticneedsassessmentinoutpatientcancercarearandomisedcontrolledtrial