Cargando…

Protocol for a feasibility, acceptability and safety study of the PICO device (negative pressure wound therapy) in acute paediatric burns

INTRODUCTION: Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in acute burn care may decrease the time to re-epithelialisation by more than 20%. Despite this, the perceived burden of use; including therapeutic, physical and financial, have limited the use of NPWT in acute burn care. This might be minimised b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lumsden, Emma Joan, Kimble, Roy M, McMillan, Catherine, Storey, Kristen, Ware, Robert S, Griffin, Bronwyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10163492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37137557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068499
_version_ 1785037893780111360
author Lumsden, Emma Joan
Kimble, Roy M
McMillan, Catherine
Storey, Kristen
Ware, Robert S
Griffin, Bronwyn
author_facet Lumsden, Emma Joan
Kimble, Roy M
McMillan, Catherine
Storey, Kristen
Ware, Robert S
Griffin, Bronwyn
author_sort Lumsden, Emma Joan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in acute burn care may decrease the time to re-epithelialisation by more than 20%. Despite this, the perceived burden of use; including therapeutic, physical and financial, have limited the use of NPWT in acute burn care. This might be minimised by using the small, ultraportable, single-use NPWT device PICO as opposed to larger devices, which to date has never been studied in acute burn care. This research will; therefore, primarily assess the feasibility, acceptability and safety of PICO in paediatric burns. Secondary outcomes include time to re-epithelialisation, pain, itch, cost and scar formation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol details a clinical trial methodology and is pre-results. This single site, prospective, pilot randomised controlled trial will be conducted in an Australian quaternary paediatric burns centre. Participants must be aged ≤16 years, otherwise well and managed within 24 hours of sustaining a burn that fits beneath a PICO dressing. Thirty participants will be randomised to one of three groups: group A: Mepitel and ACTICOAT, group B: Mepitel, ACTICOAT and PICO and group C: Mepitel, ACTICOAT Flex and PICO. Patient outcomes will be recorded at each dressing change to assess efficacy and safety outcomes until 3 months postburn wound re-epithelialisation. Surveys, randomisation and data storage will be undertaken via online platforms and physical data storage collated at the Centre for Children’s Health Research, Brisbane, Australia. Analysis will be done by using StataSE 17.0 statistical software. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics has been obtained from Queensland Health and Griffith Human Research Ethics committees including a site-specific approval. These data will be disseminated via clinical meetings, conference presentations and peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12622000009718.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10163492
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101634922023-05-07 Protocol for a feasibility, acceptability and safety study of the PICO device (negative pressure wound therapy) in acute paediatric burns Lumsden, Emma Joan Kimble, Roy M McMillan, Catherine Storey, Kristen Ware, Robert S Griffin, Bronwyn BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in acute burn care may decrease the time to re-epithelialisation by more than 20%. Despite this, the perceived burden of use; including therapeutic, physical and financial, have limited the use of NPWT in acute burn care. This might be minimised by using the small, ultraportable, single-use NPWT device PICO as opposed to larger devices, which to date has never been studied in acute burn care. This research will; therefore, primarily assess the feasibility, acceptability and safety of PICO in paediatric burns. Secondary outcomes include time to re-epithelialisation, pain, itch, cost and scar formation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol details a clinical trial methodology and is pre-results. This single site, prospective, pilot randomised controlled trial will be conducted in an Australian quaternary paediatric burns centre. Participants must be aged ≤16 years, otherwise well and managed within 24 hours of sustaining a burn that fits beneath a PICO dressing. Thirty participants will be randomised to one of three groups: group A: Mepitel and ACTICOAT, group B: Mepitel, ACTICOAT and PICO and group C: Mepitel, ACTICOAT Flex and PICO. Patient outcomes will be recorded at each dressing change to assess efficacy and safety outcomes until 3 months postburn wound re-epithelialisation. Surveys, randomisation and data storage will be undertaken via online platforms and physical data storage collated at the Centre for Children’s Health Research, Brisbane, Australia. Analysis will be done by using StataSE 17.0 statistical software. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics has been obtained from Queensland Health and Griffith Human Research Ethics committees including a site-specific approval. These data will be disseminated via clinical meetings, conference presentations and peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12622000009718. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10163492/ /pubmed/37137557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068499 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Surgery
Lumsden, Emma Joan
Kimble, Roy M
McMillan, Catherine
Storey, Kristen
Ware, Robert S
Griffin, Bronwyn
Protocol for a feasibility, acceptability and safety study of the PICO device (negative pressure wound therapy) in acute paediatric burns
title Protocol for a feasibility, acceptability and safety study of the PICO device (negative pressure wound therapy) in acute paediatric burns
title_full Protocol for a feasibility, acceptability and safety study of the PICO device (negative pressure wound therapy) in acute paediatric burns
title_fullStr Protocol for a feasibility, acceptability and safety study of the PICO device (negative pressure wound therapy) in acute paediatric burns
title_full_unstemmed Protocol for a feasibility, acceptability and safety study of the PICO device (negative pressure wound therapy) in acute paediatric burns
title_short Protocol for a feasibility, acceptability and safety study of the PICO device (negative pressure wound therapy) in acute paediatric burns
title_sort protocol for a feasibility, acceptability and safety study of the pico device (negative pressure wound therapy) in acute paediatric burns
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10163492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37137557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068499
work_keys_str_mv AT lumsdenemmajoan protocolforafeasibilityacceptabilityandsafetystudyofthepicodevicenegativepressurewoundtherapyinacutepaediatricburns
AT kimbleroym protocolforafeasibilityacceptabilityandsafetystudyofthepicodevicenegativepressurewoundtherapyinacutepaediatricburns
AT mcmillancatherine protocolforafeasibilityacceptabilityandsafetystudyofthepicodevicenegativepressurewoundtherapyinacutepaediatricburns
AT storeykristen protocolforafeasibilityacceptabilityandsafetystudyofthepicodevicenegativepressurewoundtherapyinacutepaediatricburns
AT wareroberts protocolforafeasibilityacceptabilityandsafetystudyofthepicodevicenegativepressurewoundtherapyinacutepaediatricburns
AT griffinbronwyn protocolforafeasibilityacceptabilityandsafetystudyofthepicodevicenegativepressurewoundtherapyinacutepaediatricburns