Cargando…

Talimogene laherparepvec in combination with ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone for advanced melanoma: 5-year final analysis of a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase II trial

Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) plus ipilimumab has demonstrated greater antitumor activity versus ipilimumab alone, without additional toxicity, in patients with advanced melanoma. Here, we report the 5-year outcomes from a randomized phase II study. These data provide the longest efficacy and saf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chesney, Jason A, Puzanov, Igor, Collichio, Frances A, Singh, Parminder, Milhem, Mohammed M, Glaspy, John, Hamid, Omid, Ross, Merrick, Friedlander, Philip, Garbe, Claus, Logan, Theodore, Hauschild, Axel, Lebbé, Celeste, Joshi, Harshada, Snyder, Wendy, Mehnert, Janice M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10163510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37142291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2022-006270
_version_ 1785037897399795712
author Chesney, Jason A
Puzanov, Igor
Collichio, Frances A
Singh, Parminder
Milhem, Mohammed M
Glaspy, John
Hamid, Omid
Ross, Merrick
Friedlander, Philip
Garbe, Claus
Logan, Theodore
Hauschild, Axel
Lebbé, Celeste
Joshi, Harshada
Snyder, Wendy
Mehnert, Janice M
author_facet Chesney, Jason A
Puzanov, Igor
Collichio, Frances A
Singh, Parminder
Milhem, Mohammed M
Glaspy, John
Hamid, Omid
Ross, Merrick
Friedlander, Philip
Garbe, Claus
Logan, Theodore
Hauschild, Axel
Lebbé, Celeste
Joshi, Harshada
Snyder, Wendy
Mehnert, Janice M
author_sort Chesney, Jason A
collection PubMed
description Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) plus ipilimumab has demonstrated greater antitumor activity versus ipilimumab alone, without additional toxicity, in patients with advanced melanoma. Here, we report the 5-year outcomes from a randomized phase II study. These data provide the longest efficacy and safety follow-up for patients with melanoma treated with a combination of an oncolytic virus and a checkpoint inhibitor. Eligible patients with unresectable stage IIIB‒IV melanoma were randomized 1:1 to receive T-VEC plus ipilimumab or ipilimumab alone. T-VEC was administered intralesionally at 10(6) plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL in week 1, followed by 10(8) PFU/mL in week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter. Ipilimumab (3 mg/kg every 3 weeks; ≤4 doses) was administered intravenously starting at week 1 in the ipilimumab arm and week 6 in the combination arm. The primary end point was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per immune-related response criteria; key secondary end points included durable response rate (DRR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Overall, 198 patients were randomized to receive the combination (n=98) or ipilimumab (n=100). The combination improved the ORR versus ipilimumab (35.7% vs 16.0%; OR 2.9; 95% CI 1.5 to 5.7; p=0.003). DRR was 33.7% and 13.0% (unadjusted OR 3.4; 95% CI 1.7 to 7.0; descriptive p=0.001), respectively. Among the objective responders, the median DOR was 69.2 months (95% CI 38.5 to not estimable) with the combination and was not reached with ipilimumab. Median PFS was 13.5 months with the combination and 6.4 months with ipilimumab (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.09; descriptive p=0.14). Estimated 5-year OS was 54.7% (95% CI 43.9 to 64.2) in the combination arm and 48.4% (95% CI 37.9 to 58.1) in the ipilimumab arm. Forty-seven (48.0%) and 65 (65.0%) patients in the combination and ipilimumab arms, respectively, received subsequent therapies. No new safety signals were reported. At the 5-year follow-up, the improved response rates observed with T-VEC plus ipilimumab were durable. This is the first randomized controlled study of the combination of an oncolytic virus and a checkpoint inhibitor that meets its primary end point.Trial registration number: NCT01740297.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10163510
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101635102023-05-07 Talimogene laherparepvec in combination with ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone for advanced melanoma: 5-year final analysis of a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase II trial Chesney, Jason A Puzanov, Igor Collichio, Frances A Singh, Parminder Milhem, Mohammed M Glaspy, John Hamid, Omid Ross, Merrick Friedlander, Philip Garbe, Claus Logan, Theodore Hauschild, Axel Lebbé, Celeste Joshi, Harshada Snyder, Wendy Mehnert, Janice M J Immunother Cancer Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) plus ipilimumab has demonstrated greater antitumor activity versus ipilimumab alone, without additional toxicity, in patients with advanced melanoma. Here, we report the 5-year outcomes from a randomized phase II study. These data provide the longest efficacy and safety follow-up for patients with melanoma treated with a combination of an oncolytic virus and a checkpoint inhibitor. Eligible patients with unresectable stage IIIB‒IV melanoma were randomized 1:1 to receive T-VEC plus ipilimumab or ipilimumab alone. T-VEC was administered intralesionally at 10(6) plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL in week 1, followed by 10(8) PFU/mL in week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter. Ipilimumab (3 mg/kg every 3 weeks; ≤4 doses) was administered intravenously starting at week 1 in the ipilimumab arm and week 6 in the combination arm. The primary end point was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per immune-related response criteria; key secondary end points included durable response rate (DRR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Overall, 198 patients were randomized to receive the combination (n=98) or ipilimumab (n=100). The combination improved the ORR versus ipilimumab (35.7% vs 16.0%; OR 2.9; 95% CI 1.5 to 5.7; p=0.003). DRR was 33.7% and 13.0% (unadjusted OR 3.4; 95% CI 1.7 to 7.0; descriptive p=0.001), respectively. Among the objective responders, the median DOR was 69.2 months (95% CI 38.5 to not estimable) with the combination and was not reached with ipilimumab. Median PFS was 13.5 months with the combination and 6.4 months with ipilimumab (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.09; descriptive p=0.14). Estimated 5-year OS was 54.7% (95% CI 43.9 to 64.2) in the combination arm and 48.4% (95% CI 37.9 to 58.1) in the ipilimumab arm. Forty-seven (48.0%) and 65 (65.0%) patients in the combination and ipilimumab arms, respectively, received subsequent therapies. No new safety signals were reported. At the 5-year follow-up, the improved response rates observed with T-VEC plus ipilimumab were durable. This is the first randomized controlled study of the combination of an oncolytic virus and a checkpoint inhibitor that meets its primary end point.Trial registration number: NCT01740297. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10163510/ /pubmed/37142291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2022-006270 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy
Chesney, Jason A
Puzanov, Igor
Collichio, Frances A
Singh, Parminder
Milhem, Mohammed M
Glaspy, John
Hamid, Omid
Ross, Merrick
Friedlander, Philip
Garbe, Claus
Logan, Theodore
Hauschild, Axel
Lebbé, Celeste
Joshi, Harshada
Snyder, Wendy
Mehnert, Janice M
Talimogene laherparepvec in combination with ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone for advanced melanoma: 5-year final analysis of a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase II trial
title Talimogene laherparepvec in combination with ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone for advanced melanoma: 5-year final analysis of a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase II trial
title_full Talimogene laherparepvec in combination with ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone for advanced melanoma: 5-year final analysis of a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase II trial
title_fullStr Talimogene laherparepvec in combination with ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone for advanced melanoma: 5-year final analysis of a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase II trial
title_full_unstemmed Talimogene laherparepvec in combination with ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone for advanced melanoma: 5-year final analysis of a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase II trial
title_short Talimogene laherparepvec in combination with ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone for advanced melanoma: 5-year final analysis of a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase II trial
title_sort talimogene laherparepvec in combination with ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone for advanced melanoma: 5-year final analysis of a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase ii trial
topic Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10163510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37142291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2022-006270
work_keys_str_mv AT chesneyjasona talimogenelaherparepvecincombinationwithipilimumabversusipilimumabaloneforadvancedmelanoma5yearfinalanalysisofamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphaseiitrial
AT puzanovigor talimogenelaherparepvecincombinationwithipilimumabversusipilimumabaloneforadvancedmelanoma5yearfinalanalysisofamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphaseiitrial
AT collichiofrancesa talimogenelaherparepvecincombinationwithipilimumabversusipilimumabaloneforadvancedmelanoma5yearfinalanalysisofamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphaseiitrial
AT singhparminder talimogenelaherparepvecincombinationwithipilimumabversusipilimumabaloneforadvancedmelanoma5yearfinalanalysisofamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphaseiitrial
AT milhemmohammedm talimogenelaherparepvecincombinationwithipilimumabversusipilimumabaloneforadvancedmelanoma5yearfinalanalysisofamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphaseiitrial
AT glaspyjohn talimogenelaherparepvecincombinationwithipilimumabversusipilimumabaloneforadvancedmelanoma5yearfinalanalysisofamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphaseiitrial
AT hamidomid talimogenelaherparepvecincombinationwithipilimumabversusipilimumabaloneforadvancedmelanoma5yearfinalanalysisofamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphaseiitrial
AT rossmerrick talimogenelaherparepvecincombinationwithipilimumabversusipilimumabaloneforadvancedmelanoma5yearfinalanalysisofamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphaseiitrial
AT friedlanderphilip talimogenelaherparepvecincombinationwithipilimumabversusipilimumabaloneforadvancedmelanoma5yearfinalanalysisofamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphaseiitrial
AT garbeclaus talimogenelaherparepvecincombinationwithipilimumabversusipilimumabaloneforadvancedmelanoma5yearfinalanalysisofamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphaseiitrial
AT logantheodore talimogenelaherparepvecincombinationwithipilimumabversusipilimumabaloneforadvancedmelanoma5yearfinalanalysisofamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphaseiitrial
AT hauschildaxel talimogenelaherparepvecincombinationwithipilimumabversusipilimumabaloneforadvancedmelanoma5yearfinalanalysisofamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphaseiitrial
AT lebbeceleste talimogenelaherparepvecincombinationwithipilimumabversusipilimumabaloneforadvancedmelanoma5yearfinalanalysisofamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphaseiitrial
AT joshiharshada talimogenelaherparepvecincombinationwithipilimumabversusipilimumabaloneforadvancedmelanoma5yearfinalanalysisofamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphaseiitrial
AT snyderwendy talimogenelaherparepvecincombinationwithipilimumabversusipilimumabaloneforadvancedmelanoma5yearfinalanalysisofamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphaseiitrial
AT mehnertjanicem talimogenelaherparepvecincombinationwithipilimumabversusipilimumabaloneforadvancedmelanoma5yearfinalanalysisofamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphaseiitrial