Cargando…

Impact of a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation programme versus coronary revascularisation in patients with stable angina pectoris: study protocol for the PRO-FIT randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Currently, in the majority of patients with stable angina pectoris (SAP) treatment consists of optimal medical treatment, potentially followed by coronary angiography and subsequent coronary revascularisation if necessary”. Recent work questioned the effectiveness of these invasive proce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heutinck, Joyce M., De Koning, Iris A., Vromen, Tom, Van Geuns, Robert-Jan M., Thijssen, Dick H.J., Kemps, Hareld M.C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10163688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37147562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03266-z
_version_ 1785037934796210176
author Heutinck, Joyce M.
De Koning, Iris A.
Vromen, Tom
Van Geuns, Robert-Jan M.
Thijssen, Dick H.J.
Kemps, Hareld M.C.
author_facet Heutinck, Joyce M.
De Koning, Iris A.
Vromen, Tom
Van Geuns, Robert-Jan M.
Thijssen, Dick H.J.
Kemps, Hareld M.C.
author_sort Heutinck, Joyce M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Currently, in the majority of patients with stable angina pectoris (SAP) treatment consists of optimal medical treatment, potentially followed by coronary angiography and subsequent coronary revascularisation if necessary”. Recent work questioned the effectiveness of these invasive procedures in reducing re-events and improving prognosis. The potential of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation on clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease is well-known. However, in the modern era, no studies compared the effects of cardiac rehabilitation versus coronary revascularisation in patients with SAP. METHODS: In this multicentre randomised controlled trial, 216 patients with stable angina pectoris and residual anginal complaints under optimal medical treatment will be randomised to: 1) usual care (i.e., coronary revascularisation), or 2) a 12-month cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programme. CR consists of a multidisciplinary intervention, including education, exercise training, lifestyle coaching and a dietary intervention with a stepped decline in supervision. The primary outcome will be anginal complaints (Seattle Angina Questionnaire-7) following the 12-month intervention. Secondary outcomes include cost-effectiveness, ischemic threshold during exercise, cardiovascular events, exercise capacity, quality of life and psychosocial wellbeing. DISCUSSION: In this study, we will examine the hypothesis that multidisciplinary CR is at least equally effective in reducing anginal complaints as the contemporary invasive approach at 12-months follow-up for patients with SAP. If proven successful, this study will have significant impact on the treatment of patients with SAP as multidisciplinary CR is a less invasive and potentially less costly and better sustainable treatment than coronary revascularisations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register, NL9537. Registered 14 June 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-023-03266-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10163688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101636882023-05-07 Impact of a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation programme versus coronary revascularisation in patients with stable angina pectoris: study protocol for the PRO-FIT randomised controlled trial Heutinck, Joyce M. De Koning, Iris A. Vromen, Tom Van Geuns, Robert-Jan M. Thijssen, Dick H.J. Kemps, Hareld M.C. BMC Cardiovasc Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Currently, in the majority of patients with stable angina pectoris (SAP) treatment consists of optimal medical treatment, potentially followed by coronary angiography and subsequent coronary revascularisation if necessary”. Recent work questioned the effectiveness of these invasive procedures in reducing re-events and improving prognosis. The potential of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation on clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease is well-known. However, in the modern era, no studies compared the effects of cardiac rehabilitation versus coronary revascularisation in patients with SAP. METHODS: In this multicentre randomised controlled trial, 216 patients with stable angina pectoris and residual anginal complaints under optimal medical treatment will be randomised to: 1) usual care (i.e., coronary revascularisation), or 2) a 12-month cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programme. CR consists of a multidisciplinary intervention, including education, exercise training, lifestyle coaching and a dietary intervention with a stepped decline in supervision. The primary outcome will be anginal complaints (Seattle Angina Questionnaire-7) following the 12-month intervention. Secondary outcomes include cost-effectiveness, ischemic threshold during exercise, cardiovascular events, exercise capacity, quality of life and psychosocial wellbeing. DISCUSSION: In this study, we will examine the hypothesis that multidisciplinary CR is at least equally effective in reducing anginal complaints as the contemporary invasive approach at 12-months follow-up for patients with SAP. If proven successful, this study will have significant impact on the treatment of patients with SAP as multidisciplinary CR is a less invasive and potentially less costly and better sustainable treatment than coronary revascularisations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register, NL9537. Registered 14 June 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-023-03266-z. BioMed Central 2023-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10163688/ /pubmed/37147562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03266-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Heutinck, Joyce M.
De Koning, Iris A.
Vromen, Tom
Van Geuns, Robert-Jan M.
Thijssen, Dick H.J.
Kemps, Hareld M.C.
Impact of a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation programme versus coronary revascularisation in patients with stable angina pectoris: study protocol for the PRO-FIT randomised controlled trial
title Impact of a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation programme versus coronary revascularisation in patients with stable angina pectoris: study protocol for the PRO-FIT randomised controlled trial
title_full Impact of a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation programme versus coronary revascularisation in patients with stable angina pectoris: study protocol for the PRO-FIT randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Impact of a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation programme versus coronary revascularisation in patients with stable angina pectoris: study protocol for the PRO-FIT randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Impact of a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation programme versus coronary revascularisation in patients with stable angina pectoris: study protocol for the PRO-FIT randomised controlled trial
title_short Impact of a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation programme versus coronary revascularisation in patients with stable angina pectoris: study protocol for the PRO-FIT randomised controlled trial
title_sort impact of a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation programme versus coronary revascularisation in patients with stable angina pectoris: study protocol for the pro-fit randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10163688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37147562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03266-z
work_keys_str_mv AT heutinckjoycem impactofacomprehensivecardiacrehabilitationprogrammeversuscoronaryrevascularisationinpatientswithstableanginapectorisstudyprotocolfortheprofitrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dekoningirisa impactofacomprehensivecardiacrehabilitationprogrammeversuscoronaryrevascularisationinpatientswithstableanginapectorisstudyprotocolfortheprofitrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vromentom impactofacomprehensivecardiacrehabilitationprogrammeversuscoronaryrevascularisationinpatientswithstableanginapectorisstudyprotocolfortheprofitrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vangeunsrobertjanm impactofacomprehensivecardiacrehabilitationprogrammeversuscoronaryrevascularisationinpatientswithstableanginapectorisstudyprotocolfortheprofitrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT thijssendickhj impactofacomprehensivecardiacrehabilitationprogrammeversuscoronaryrevascularisationinpatientswithstableanginapectorisstudyprotocolfortheprofitrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kempshareldmc impactofacomprehensivecardiacrehabilitationprogrammeversuscoronaryrevascularisationinpatientswithstableanginapectorisstudyprotocolfortheprofitrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT impactofacomprehensivecardiacrehabilitationprogrammeversuscoronaryrevascularisationinpatientswithstableanginapectorisstudyprotocolfortheprofitrandomisedcontrolledtrial