Cargando…

A comparison of traditional plant knowledge between Daman people and Tibetans in Gyirong River Valley, Tibet, China

BACKGROUND: By comparing the differences in plant use between various cultures or regions, we can gain a better understanding of traditional knowledge of plant use among different groups, which may lead to a more objective understanding. Even though the Tibetan and Daman people live in the same ecos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Chang-An, Ding, Xiaoyong, Hu, Huabin, Zhang, Yu, Bianba, Ciren, Bian, Ba, Wang, Yuhua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10163752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37147662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-023-00583-7
_version_ 1785037949218324480
author Guo, Chang-An
Ding, Xiaoyong
Hu, Huabin
Zhang, Yu
Bianba, Ciren
Bian, Ba
Wang, Yuhua
author_facet Guo, Chang-An
Ding, Xiaoyong
Hu, Huabin
Zhang, Yu
Bianba, Ciren
Bian, Ba
Wang, Yuhua
author_sort Guo, Chang-An
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: By comparing the differences in plant use between various cultures or regions, we can gain a better understanding of traditional knowledge of plant use among different groups, which may lead to a more objective understanding. Even though the Tibetan and Daman people live in the same ecosystem in Gyirong town, China, their cultural backgrounds and livelihoods differ. Therefore, the objective of this study is to document the traditional knowledge of plant use among the Daman people and compare it with the local Tibetan knowledge of plant use. By doing so, we aim to explore the relationship between plant selection and use and the cultural backgrounds of different groups. METHODS: During fieldwork, ethnobotanical data were collected using various methods including free listings, key informant interviews, and semi-structured interviews. To quantify the importance of plant species in the Daman people’s culture, the culture importance index, informant consensus factor index, and The Index of Agreement on Species consensus (IASc) were used. In addition, we cited previous ethnobotanical survey data from the Tibetan in Gyirong. To more comprehensively compare the differences in plant use between the Daman and Tibetan, this study constructed a knowledge network to compare the knowledge differences between the two groups. RESULTS: In this study, traditional knowledge was collected from 32 Daman informants, resulting in a total of 68 species belonging to 39 families mentioned by Daman people and 111 species mentioned by Tibetans. Of these, 58 plants were used by both populations. The plants were classified into 3 categories and 28 subcategories, with 22 identical classes in both groups. The majority of use categories showed a high degree of sharing in both groups, and the Tibetan people had more plant use categories than the Daman people. Five plants with IASc value > 0.5 were identified in both groups: Rhododendron anthopogon D. Don, Artemisia japonica Thunb., Juniperus indica Bertol., Gastrodia elata Blume, and Rheum australe D. Don. The analysis of the knowledge network revealed a 66% overlap between the knowledge of the Daman and the knowledge of the Tibetans. Additionally, the plant knowledge of Tibetan people was found to be richer and more complex than that of the Daman people. However, the Daman people possess 30 unique knowledge items. CONCLUSIONS: From the perspective of plant use, the history of the Daman people's discrete migration on the border between China and Nepal allows them to retain their own knowledge of plant use. The status quo of joining Chinese nationality and settling in Gyirong town allows them to gradually integrate into the local Tibetan society. In summary, despite living in the same ecosystem and biodiversity background, the plant utilization of the Daman people and Tibetans still shows significant differences, which are due to their different cultural backgrounds and social status. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13002-023-00583-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10163752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101637522023-05-07 A comparison of traditional plant knowledge between Daman people and Tibetans in Gyirong River Valley, Tibet, China Guo, Chang-An Ding, Xiaoyong Hu, Huabin Zhang, Yu Bianba, Ciren Bian, Ba Wang, Yuhua J Ethnobiol Ethnomed Research BACKGROUND: By comparing the differences in plant use between various cultures or regions, we can gain a better understanding of traditional knowledge of plant use among different groups, which may lead to a more objective understanding. Even though the Tibetan and Daman people live in the same ecosystem in Gyirong town, China, their cultural backgrounds and livelihoods differ. Therefore, the objective of this study is to document the traditional knowledge of plant use among the Daman people and compare it with the local Tibetan knowledge of plant use. By doing so, we aim to explore the relationship between plant selection and use and the cultural backgrounds of different groups. METHODS: During fieldwork, ethnobotanical data were collected using various methods including free listings, key informant interviews, and semi-structured interviews. To quantify the importance of plant species in the Daman people’s culture, the culture importance index, informant consensus factor index, and The Index of Agreement on Species consensus (IASc) were used. In addition, we cited previous ethnobotanical survey data from the Tibetan in Gyirong. To more comprehensively compare the differences in plant use between the Daman and Tibetan, this study constructed a knowledge network to compare the knowledge differences between the two groups. RESULTS: In this study, traditional knowledge was collected from 32 Daman informants, resulting in a total of 68 species belonging to 39 families mentioned by Daman people and 111 species mentioned by Tibetans. Of these, 58 plants were used by both populations. The plants were classified into 3 categories and 28 subcategories, with 22 identical classes in both groups. The majority of use categories showed a high degree of sharing in both groups, and the Tibetan people had more plant use categories than the Daman people. Five plants with IASc value > 0.5 were identified in both groups: Rhododendron anthopogon D. Don, Artemisia japonica Thunb., Juniperus indica Bertol., Gastrodia elata Blume, and Rheum australe D. Don. The analysis of the knowledge network revealed a 66% overlap between the knowledge of the Daman and the knowledge of the Tibetans. Additionally, the plant knowledge of Tibetan people was found to be richer and more complex than that of the Daman people. However, the Daman people possess 30 unique knowledge items. CONCLUSIONS: From the perspective of plant use, the history of the Daman people's discrete migration on the border between China and Nepal allows them to retain their own knowledge of plant use. The status quo of joining Chinese nationality and settling in Gyirong town allows them to gradually integrate into the local Tibetan society. In summary, despite living in the same ecosystem and biodiversity background, the plant utilization of the Daman people and Tibetans still shows significant differences, which are due to their different cultural backgrounds and social status. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13002-023-00583-7. BioMed Central 2023-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10163752/ /pubmed/37147662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-023-00583-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Guo, Chang-An
Ding, Xiaoyong
Hu, Huabin
Zhang, Yu
Bianba, Ciren
Bian, Ba
Wang, Yuhua
A comparison of traditional plant knowledge between Daman people and Tibetans in Gyirong River Valley, Tibet, China
title A comparison of traditional plant knowledge between Daman people and Tibetans in Gyirong River Valley, Tibet, China
title_full A comparison of traditional plant knowledge between Daman people and Tibetans in Gyirong River Valley, Tibet, China
title_fullStr A comparison of traditional plant knowledge between Daman people and Tibetans in Gyirong River Valley, Tibet, China
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of traditional plant knowledge between Daman people and Tibetans in Gyirong River Valley, Tibet, China
title_short A comparison of traditional plant knowledge between Daman people and Tibetans in Gyirong River Valley, Tibet, China
title_sort comparison of traditional plant knowledge between daman people and tibetans in gyirong river valley, tibet, china
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10163752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37147662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-023-00583-7
work_keys_str_mv AT guochangan acomparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina
AT dingxiaoyong acomparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina
AT huhuabin acomparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina
AT zhangyu acomparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina
AT bianbaciren acomparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina
AT bianba acomparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina
AT wangyuhua acomparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina
AT guochangan comparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina
AT dingxiaoyong comparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina
AT huhuabin comparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina
AT zhangyu comparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina
AT bianbaciren comparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina
AT bianba comparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina
AT wangyuhua comparisonoftraditionalplantknowledgebetweendamanpeopleandtibetansingyirongrivervalleytibetchina