Cargando…

Camera-based Prospective Motion Correction in Paediatric Epilepsy Patients Enables EEG-fMRI Localization Even in High-motion States

Background: EEG-fMRI is a useful additional test to localize the epileptogenic zone (EZ) particularly in MRI negative cases. However subject motion presents a particular challenge owing to its large effects on both MRI and EEG signal. Traditionally it is assumed that prospective motion correction (P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steinbrenner, Mirja, McDowell, Amy, Centeno, Maria, Moeller, Friederike, Perani, Suejen, Lorio, Sara, Maziero, Danilo, Carmichael, David W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10164016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36939987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-023-00945-0
_version_ 1785038001701650432
author Steinbrenner, Mirja
McDowell, Amy
Centeno, Maria
Moeller, Friederike
Perani, Suejen
Lorio, Sara
Maziero, Danilo
Carmichael, David W.
author_facet Steinbrenner, Mirja
McDowell, Amy
Centeno, Maria
Moeller, Friederike
Perani, Suejen
Lorio, Sara
Maziero, Danilo
Carmichael, David W.
author_sort Steinbrenner, Mirja
collection PubMed
description Background: EEG-fMRI is a useful additional test to localize the epileptogenic zone (EZ) particularly in MRI negative cases. However subject motion presents a particular challenge owing to its large effects on both MRI and EEG signal. Traditionally it is assumed that prospective motion correction (PMC) of fMRI precludes EEG artifact correction. Methods: Children undergoing presurgical assessment at Great Ormond Street Hospital were included into the study. PMC of fMRI was done using a commercial system with a Moiré Phase Tracking marker and MR-compatible camera. For retrospective EEG correction both a standard and a motion educated EEG artefact correction (REEGMAS) were compared to each other. Results: Ten children underwent simultaneous EEG-fMRI. Overall head movement was high (mean RMS velocity < 1.5 mm/s) and showed high inter- and intra-individual variability. Comparing motion measured by the PMC camera and the (uncorrected residual) motion detected by realignment of fMRI images, there was a five-fold reduction in motion from its prospective correction. Retrospective EEG correction using both standard approaches and REEGMAS allowed the visualization and identification of physiological noise and epileptiform discharges. Seven of 10 children had significant maps, which were concordant with the clinical EZ hypothesis in 6 of these 7. Conclusion: To our knowledge this is the first application of camera-based PMC for MRI in a pediatric clinical setting. Despite large amount of movement PMC in combination with retrospective EEG correction recovered data and obtained clinically meaningful results during high levels of subject motion. Practical limitations may currently limit the widespread use of this technology. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10548-023-00945-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10164016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101640162023-05-08 Camera-based Prospective Motion Correction in Paediatric Epilepsy Patients Enables EEG-fMRI Localization Even in High-motion States Steinbrenner, Mirja McDowell, Amy Centeno, Maria Moeller, Friederike Perani, Suejen Lorio, Sara Maziero, Danilo Carmichael, David W. Brain Topogr Original Paper Background: EEG-fMRI is a useful additional test to localize the epileptogenic zone (EZ) particularly in MRI negative cases. However subject motion presents a particular challenge owing to its large effects on both MRI and EEG signal. Traditionally it is assumed that prospective motion correction (PMC) of fMRI precludes EEG artifact correction. Methods: Children undergoing presurgical assessment at Great Ormond Street Hospital were included into the study. PMC of fMRI was done using a commercial system with a Moiré Phase Tracking marker and MR-compatible camera. For retrospective EEG correction both a standard and a motion educated EEG artefact correction (REEGMAS) were compared to each other. Results: Ten children underwent simultaneous EEG-fMRI. Overall head movement was high (mean RMS velocity < 1.5 mm/s) and showed high inter- and intra-individual variability. Comparing motion measured by the PMC camera and the (uncorrected residual) motion detected by realignment of fMRI images, there was a five-fold reduction in motion from its prospective correction. Retrospective EEG correction using both standard approaches and REEGMAS allowed the visualization and identification of physiological noise and epileptiform discharges. Seven of 10 children had significant maps, which were concordant with the clinical EZ hypothesis in 6 of these 7. Conclusion: To our knowledge this is the first application of camera-based PMC for MRI in a pediatric clinical setting. Despite large amount of movement PMC in combination with retrospective EEG correction recovered data and obtained clinically meaningful results during high levels of subject motion. Practical limitations may currently limit the widespread use of this technology. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10548-023-00945-0. Springer US 2023-03-20 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10164016/ /pubmed/36939987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-023-00945-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Steinbrenner, Mirja
McDowell, Amy
Centeno, Maria
Moeller, Friederike
Perani, Suejen
Lorio, Sara
Maziero, Danilo
Carmichael, David W.
Camera-based Prospective Motion Correction in Paediatric Epilepsy Patients Enables EEG-fMRI Localization Even in High-motion States
title Camera-based Prospective Motion Correction in Paediatric Epilepsy Patients Enables EEG-fMRI Localization Even in High-motion States
title_full Camera-based Prospective Motion Correction in Paediatric Epilepsy Patients Enables EEG-fMRI Localization Even in High-motion States
title_fullStr Camera-based Prospective Motion Correction in Paediatric Epilepsy Patients Enables EEG-fMRI Localization Even in High-motion States
title_full_unstemmed Camera-based Prospective Motion Correction in Paediatric Epilepsy Patients Enables EEG-fMRI Localization Even in High-motion States
title_short Camera-based Prospective Motion Correction in Paediatric Epilepsy Patients Enables EEG-fMRI Localization Even in High-motion States
title_sort camera-based prospective motion correction in paediatric epilepsy patients enables eeg-fmri localization even in high-motion states
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10164016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36939987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-023-00945-0
work_keys_str_mv AT steinbrennermirja camerabasedprospectivemotioncorrectioninpaediatricepilepsypatientsenableseegfmrilocalizationeveninhighmotionstates
AT mcdowellamy camerabasedprospectivemotioncorrectioninpaediatricepilepsypatientsenableseegfmrilocalizationeveninhighmotionstates
AT centenomaria camerabasedprospectivemotioncorrectioninpaediatricepilepsypatientsenableseegfmrilocalizationeveninhighmotionstates
AT moellerfriederike camerabasedprospectivemotioncorrectioninpaediatricepilepsypatientsenableseegfmrilocalizationeveninhighmotionstates
AT peranisuejen camerabasedprospectivemotioncorrectioninpaediatricepilepsypatientsenableseegfmrilocalizationeveninhighmotionstates
AT loriosara camerabasedprospectivemotioncorrectioninpaediatricepilepsypatientsenableseegfmrilocalizationeveninhighmotionstates
AT mazierodanilo camerabasedprospectivemotioncorrectioninpaediatricepilepsypatientsenableseegfmrilocalizationeveninhighmotionstates
AT carmichaeldavidw camerabasedprospectivemotioncorrectioninpaediatricepilepsypatientsenableseegfmrilocalizationeveninhighmotionstates