Cargando…

Accuracy of the Lacrimal Syringing Test in Relation to Dacryocystography and Dacryoendoscopy

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the lacrimal syringing test (syringing) in relation to dacryocystography (DCG) and dacryoendoscopy (DE) in lacrimal pathway (LP) obstruction. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 101 patients (188 LPs) who underwent syringing, cone-beam computed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakamura, Jutaro, Kamao, Tomoyuki, Mitani, Arisa, Mizuki, Nobuhisa, Shiraishi, Atsushi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10164386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37162802
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S409662
_version_ 1785038058035347456
author Nakamura, Jutaro
Kamao, Tomoyuki
Mitani, Arisa
Mizuki, Nobuhisa
Shiraishi, Atsushi
author_facet Nakamura, Jutaro
Kamao, Tomoyuki
Mitani, Arisa
Mizuki, Nobuhisa
Shiraishi, Atsushi
author_sort Nakamura, Jutaro
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the lacrimal syringing test (syringing) in relation to dacryocystography (DCG) and dacryoendoscopy (DE) in lacrimal pathway (LP) obstruction. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 101 patients (188 LPs) who underwent syringing, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-DCG, and DE to diagnose the degree and site of LP obstruction. The degree of obstruction was classified into patent, partial obstruction, and complete obstruction. The degree of LP obstruction was determined by combining the findings of DE and CBCT-DCG and was designated as DCG+DE. When differentiating complete or partial obstruction on DE was uncertain, complete or partial obstruction was assigned if the DCG showed evidence of contrast media obstruction or passage, respectively. The consistency between syringing and DCG+DE was evaluated by calculating the weighted kappa coefficient. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of syringing were 94% and 89%, respectively. The weighted Cohen’s kappa value of agreement between syringing and DCG+DE was κ = 0.73 (SE = 0.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66–0.80, p < 0.01). When divided into presaccal and postsaccal obstruction categories, the kappa values were κ = 0.40 (SE = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.19–0.62, p < 0.01) and 0.55 (SE = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.37–0.73, p < 0.01), respectively. Furthermore, when limited to common canaliculus obstruction (stenoses), which accounted for 78% (46 LPs) of the total presaccal obstructions, the kappa value was κ = 0.29 (SE = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.05–0.54, p = 0.021), which demonstrated the lowest consistency between syringing and DCG+DE. CONCLUSION: Syringing was “substantially” in agreement with DCG+DE in detecting the degree of LP obstruction. Moreover, syringing was a sufficiently sensitive and specific test when performed by an experienced clinician. However, distinguishing between complete and partial obstructions by syringing was sometimes difficult, particularly in the common canaliculus obstruction (stenosis).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10164386
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101643862023-05-08 Accuracy of the Lacrimal Syringing Test in Relation to Dacryocystography and Dacryoendoscopy Nakamura, Jutaro Kamao, Tomoyuki Mitani, Arisa Mizuki, Nobuhisa Shiraishi, Atsushi Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the lacrimal syringing test (syringing) in relation to dacryocystography (DCG) and dacryoendoscopy (DE) in lacrimal pathway (LP) obstruction. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 101 patients (188 LPs) who underwent syringing, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-DCG, and DE to diagnose the degree and site of LP obstruction. The degree of obstruction was classified into patent, partial obstruction, and complete obstruction. The degree of LP obstruction was determined by combining the findings of DE and CBCT-DCG and was designated as DCG+DE. When differentiating complete or partial obstruction on DE was uncertain, complete or partial obstruction was assigned if the DCG showed evidence of contrast media obstruction or passage, respectively. The consistency between syringing and DCG+DE was evaluated by calculating the weighted kappa coefficient. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of syringing were 94% and 89%, respectively. The weighted Cohen’s kappa value of agreement between syringing and DCG+DE was κ = 0.73 (SE = 0.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66–0.80, p < 0.01). When divided into presaccal and postsaccal obstruction categories, the kappa values were κ = 0.40 (SE = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.19–0.62, p < 0.01) and 0.55 (SE = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.37–0.73, p < 0.01), respectively. Furthermore, when limited to common canaliculus obstruction (stenoses), which accounted for 78% (46 LPs) of the total presaccal obstructions, the kappa value was κ = 0.29 (SE = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.05–0.54, p = 0.021), which demonstrated the lowest consistency between syringing and DCG+DE. CONCLUSION: Syringing was “substantially” in agreement with DCG+DE in detecting the degree of LP obstruction. Moreover, syringing was a sufficiently sensitive and specific test when performed by an experienced clinician. However, distinguishing between complete and partial obstructions by syringing was sometimes difficult, particularly in the common canaliculus obstruction (stenosis). Dove 2023-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10164386/ /pubmed/37162802 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S409662 Text en © 2023 Nakamura et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Nakamura, Jutaro
Kamao, Tomoyuki
Mitani, Arisa
Mizuki, Nobuhisa
Shiraishi, Atsushi
Accuracy of the Lacrimal Syringing Test in Relation to Dacryocystography and Dacryoendoscopy
title Accuracy of the Lacrimal Syringing Test in Relation to Dacryocystography and Dacryoendoscopy
title_full Accuracy of the Lacrimal Syringing Test in Relation to Dacryocystography and Dacryoendoscopy
title_fullStr Accuracy of the Lacrimal Syringing Test in Relation to Dacryocystography and Dacryoendoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of the Lacrimal Syringing Test in Relation to Dacryocystography and Dacryoendoscopy
title_short Accuracy of the Lacrimal Syringing Test in Relation to Dacryocystography and Dacryoendoscopy
title_sort accuracy of the lacrimal syringing test in relation to dacryocystography and dacryoendoscopy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10164386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37162802
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S409662
work_keys_str_mv AT nakamurajutaro accuracyofthelacrimalsyringingtestinrelationtodacryocystographyanddacryoendoscopy
AT kamaotomoyuki accuracyofthelacrimalsyringingtestinrelationtodacryocystographyanddacryoendoscopy
AT mitaniarisa accuracyofthelacrimalsyringingtestinrelationtodacryocystographyanddacryoendoscopy
AT mizukinobuhisa accuracyofthelacrimalsyringingtestinrelationtodacryocystographyanddacryoendoscopy
AT shiraishiatsushi accuracyofthelacrimalsyringingtestinrelationtodacryocystographyanddacryoendoscopy