Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Versus Bezafibrate to Treat Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia: A Randomized Crossover Study

Aim: Pemafibrate is a highly selective agonist for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-α, a key regulator of lipid and glucose metabolism. We compared the efficacy and safety of pemafibrate with those of bezafibrate, a nonselective PPAR-α agonist. Methods: In this randomized crossover...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakamura, Akihiro, Kagaya, Yuta, Saito, Hiroki, Kanazawa, Masanori, Sato, Kenjiro, Miura, Masanobu, Kondo, Masateru, Endo, Hideaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japan Atherosclerosis Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10164592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35768226
http://dx.doi.org/10.5551/jat.63659
_version_ 1785038102605070336
author Nakamura, Akihiro
Kagaya, Yuta
Saito, Hiroki
Kanazawa, Masanori
Sato, Kenjiro
Miura, Masanobu
Kondo, Masateru
Endo, Hideaki
author_facet Nakamura, Akihiro
Kagaya, Yuta
Saito, Hiroki
Kanazawa, Masanori
Sato, Kenjiro
Miura, Masanobu
Kondo, Masateru
Endo, Hideaki
author_sort Nakamura, Akihiro
collection PubMed
description Aim: Pemafibrate is a highly selective agonist for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-α, a key regulator of lipid and glucose metabolism. We compared the efficacy and safety of pemafibrate with those of bezafibrate, a nonselective PPAR-α agonist. Methods: In this randomized crossover study, 60 patients with hypertriglyceridemia (fasting triglyceride [TG] ≥ 150 mg/dL) were treated with pemafibrate of 0.2 mg/day or bezafibrate of 400 mg/day for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was percent change (%Change) from baseline in TG levels, while the secondary endpoints were %Change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and apolipoprotein A-I (Apo A-I) levels. Results: The %Change in TG and Apo A-I levels was significantly greater with pemafibrate than with bezafibrate (−46.1% vs. −34.7%,p<0.001; 9.2% vs. 5.7%,p =0.018, respectively). %Change in HDL-C levels was not significantly different between the two treatments. %Change in liver enzyme levels was markedly decreased with pemafibrate than with bezafibrate. Creatinine levels significantly increased in both treatments; however, its %Change was significantly lower with pemafibrate than with bezafibrate (5.72% vs. 15.5%,p<0.001). The incidence of adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs did not differ between the two treatments; however, the number of patients with elevated creatinine levels (≥ 0.5 mg/dL and/or 25% from baseline) was significantly lower in the bezafibrate group than in the pemafibrate group (16/60 vs. 3/60,p =0.004). Conclusion: Compared with bezafibrate, pemafibrate is more effective in decreasing TG levels and increasing Apo A-I levels and is safer regarding liver and renal function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10164592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Japan Atherosclerosis Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101645922023-05-09 Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Versus Bezafibrate to Treat Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia: A Randomized Crossover Study Nakamura, Akihiro Kagaya, Yuta Saito, Hiroki Kanazawa, Masanori Sato, Kenjiro Miura, Masanobu Kondo, Masateru Endo, Hideaki J Atheroscler Thromb Original Article Aim: Pemafibrate is a highly selective agonist for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-α, a key regulator of lipid and glucose metabolism. We compared the efficacy and safety of pemafibrate with those of bezafibrate, a nonselective PPAR-α agonist. Methods: In this randomized crossover study, 60 patients with hypertriglyceridemia (fasting triglyceride [TG] ≥ 150 mg/dL) were treated with pemafibrate of 0.2 mg/day or bezafibrate of 400 mg/day for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was percent change (%Change) from baseline in TG levels, while the secondary endpoints were %Change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and apolipoprotein A-I (Apo A-I) levels. Results: The %Change in TG and Apo A-I levels was significantly greater with pemafibrate than with bezafibrate (−46.1% vs. −34.7%,p<0.001; 9.2% vs. 5.7%,p =0.018, respectively). %Change in HDL-C levels was not significantly different between the two treatments. %Change in liver enzyme levels was markedly decreased with pemafibrate than with bezafibrate. Creatinine levels significantly increased in both treatments; however, its %Change was significantly lower with pemafibrate than with bezafibrate (5.72% vs. 15.5%,p<0.001). The incidence of adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs did not differ between the two treatments; however, the number of patients with elevated creatinine levels (≥ 0.5 mg/dL and/or 25% from baseline) was significantly lower in the bezafibrate group than in the pemafibrate group (16/60 vs. 3/60,p =0.004). Conclusion: Compared with bezafibrate, pemafibrate is more effective in decreasing TG levels and increasing Apo A-I levels and is safer regarding liver and renal function. Japan Atherosclerosis Society 2023-05-01 2022-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10164592/ /pubmed/35768226 http://dx.doi.org/10.5551/jat.63659 Text en 2023 Japan Atherosclerosis Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the latest version of CC BY-NC-SA defined by the Creative Commons Attribution License.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Nakamura, Akihiro
Kagaya, Yuta
Saito, Hiroki
Kanazawa, Masanori
Sato, Kenjiro
Miura, Masanobu
Kondo, Masateru
Endo, Hideaki
Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Versus Bezafibrate to Treat Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia: A Randomized Crossover Study
title Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Versus Bezafibrate to Treat Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia: A Randomized Crossover Study
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Versus Bezafibrate to Treat Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia: A Randomized Crossover Study
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Versus Bezafibrate to Treat Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia: A Randomized Crossover Study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Versus Bezafibrate to Treat Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia: A Randomized Crossover Study
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Versus Bezafibrate to Treat Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia: A Randomized Crossover Study
title_sort efficacy and safety of pemafibrate versus bezafibrate to treat patients with hypertriglyceridemia: a randomized crossover study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10164592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35768226
http://dx.doi.org/10.5551/jat.63659
work_keys_str_mv AT nakamuraakihiro efficacyandsafetyofpemafibrateversusbezafibratetotreatpatientswithhypertriglyceridemiaarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT kagayayuta efficacyandsafetyofpemafibrateversusbezafibratetotreatpatientswithhypertriglyceridemiaarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT saitohiroki efficacyandsafetyofpemafibrateversusbezafibratetotreatpatientswithhypertriglyceridemiaarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT kanazawamasanori efficacyandsafetyofpemafibrateversusbezafibratetotreatpatientswithhypertriglyceridemiaarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT satokenjiro efficacyandsafetyofpemafibrateversusbezafibratetotreatpatientswithhypertriglyceridemiaarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT miuramasanobu efficacyandsafetyofpemafibrateversusbezafibratetotreatpatientswithhypertriglyceridemiaarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT kondomasateru efficacyandsafetyofpemafibrateversusbezafibratetotreatpatientswithhypertriglyceridemiaarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT endohideaki efficacyandsafetyofpemafibrateversusbezafibratetotreatpatientswithhypertriglyceridemiaarandomizedcrossoverstudy