Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Versus Bezafibrate to Treat Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia: A Randomized Crossover Study
Aim: Pemafibrate is a highly selective agonist for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-α, a key regulator of lipid and glucose metabolism. We compared the efficacy and safety of pemafibrate with those of bezafibrate, a nonselective PPAR-α agonist. Methods: In this randomized crossover...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Japan Atherosclerosis Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10164592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35768226 http://dx.doi.org/10.5551/jat.63659 |
_version_ | 1785038102605070336 |
---|---|
author | Nakamura, Akihiro Kagaya, Yuta Saito, Hiroki Kanazawa, Masanori Sato, Kenjiro Miura, Masanobu Kondo, Masateru Endo, Hideaki |
author_facet | Nakamura, Akihiro Kagaya, Yuta Saito, Hiroki Kanazawa, Masanori Sato, Kenjiro Miura, Masanobu Kondo, Masateru Endo, Hideaki |
author_sort | Nakamura, Akihiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aim: Pemafibrate is a highly selective agonist for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-α, a key regulator of lipid and glucose metabolism. We compared the efficacy and safety of pemafibrate with those of bezafibrate, a nonselective PPAR-α agonist. Methods: In this randomized crossover study, 60 patients with hypertriglyceridemia (fasting triglyceride [TG] ≥ 150 mg/dL) were treated with pemafibrate of 0.2 mg/day or bezafibrate of 400 mg/day for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was percent change (%Change) from baseline in TG levels, while the secondary endpoints were %Change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and apolipoprotein A-I (Apo A-I) levels. Results: The %Change in TG and Apo A-I levels was significantly greater with pemafibrate than with bezafibrate (−46.1% vs. −34.7%,p<0.001; 9.2% vs. 5.7%,p =0.018, respectively). %Change in HDL-C levels was not significantly different between the two treatments. %Change in liver enzyme levels was markedly decreased with pemafibrate than with bezafibrate. Creatinine levels significantly increased in both treatments; however, its %Change was significantly lower with pemafibrate than with bezafibrate (5.72% vs. 15.5%,p<0.001). The incidence of adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs did not differ between the two treatments; however, the number of patients with elevated creatinine levels (≥ 0.5 mg/dL and/or 25% from baseline) was significantly lower in the bezafibrate group than in the pemafibrate group (16/60 vs. 3/60,p =0.004). Conclusion: Compared with bezafibrate, pemafibrate is more effective in decreasing TG levels and increasing Apo A-I levels and is safer regarding liver and renal function. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10164592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Japan Atherosclerosis Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101645922023-05-09 Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Versus Bezafibrate to Treat Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia: A Randomized Crossover Study Nakamura, Akihiro Kagaya, Yuta Saito, Hiroki Kanazawa, Masanori Sato, Kenjiro Miura, Masanobu Kondo, Masateru Endo, Hideaki J Atheroscler Thromb Original Article Aim: Pemafibrate is a highly selective agonist for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-α, a key regulator of lipid and glucose metabolism. We compared the efficacy and safety of pemafibrate with those of bezafibrate, a nonselective PPAR-α agonist. Methods: In this randomized crossover study, 60 patients with hypertriglyceridemia (fasting triglyceride [TG] ≥ 150 mg/dL) were treated with pemafibrate of 0.2 mg/day or bezafibrate of 400 mg/day for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was percent change (%Change) from baseline in TG levels, while the secondary endpoints were %Change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and apolipoprotein A-I (Apo A-I) levels. Results: The %Change in TG and Apo A-I levels was significantly greater with pemafibrate than with bezafibrate (−46.1% vs. −34.7%,p<0.001; 9.2% vs. 5.7%,p =0.018, respectively). %Change in HDL-C levels was not significantly different between the two treatments. %Change in liver enzyme levels was markedly decreased with pemafibrate than with bezafibrate. Creatinine levels significantly increased in both treatments; however, its %Change was significantly lower with pemafibrate than with bezafibrate (5.72% vs. 15.5%,p<0.001). The incidence of adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs did not differ between the two treatments; however, the number of patients with elevated creatinine levels (≥ 0.5 mg/dL and/or 25% from baseline) was significantly lower in the bezafibrate group than in the pemafibrate group (16/60 vs. 3/60,p =0.004). Conclusion: Compared with bezafibrate, pemafibrate is more effective in decreasing TG levels and increasing Apo A-I levels and is safer regarding liver and renal function. Japan Atherosclerosis Society 2023-05-01 2022-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10164592/ /pubmed/35768226 http://dx.doi.org/10.5551/jat.63659 Text en 2023 Japan Atherosclerosis Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the latest version of CC BY-NC-SA defined by the Creative Commons Attribution License.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Article Nakamura, Akihiro Kagaya, Yuta Saito, Hiroki Kanazawa, Masanori Sato, Kenjiro Miura, Masanobu Kondo, Masateru Endo, Hideaki Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Versus Bezafibrate to Treat Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia: A Randomized Crossover Study |
title | Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Versus Bezafibrate to Treat Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia: A Randomized Crossover Study |
title_full | Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Versus Bezafibrate to Treat Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia: A Randomized Crossover Study |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Versus Bezafibrate to Treat Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia: A Randomized Crossover Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Versus Bezafibrate to Treat Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia: A Randomized Crossover Study |
title_short | Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Versus Bezafibrate to Treat Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia: A Randomized Crossover Study |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of pemafibrate versus bezafibrate to treat patients with hypertriglyceridemia: a randomized crossover study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10164592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35768226 http://dx.doi.org/10.5551/jat.63659 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakamuraakihiro efficacyandsafetyofpemafibrateversusbezafibratetotreatpatientswithhypertriglyceridemiaarandomizedcrossoverstudy AT kagayayuta efficacyandsafetyofpemafibrateversusbezafibratetotreatpatientswithhypertriglyceridemiaarandomizedcrossoverstudy AT saitohiroki efficacyandsafetyofpemafibrateversusbezafibratetotreatpatientswithhypertriglyceridemiaarandomizedcrossoverstudy AT kanazawamasanori efficacyandsafetyofpemafibrateversusbezafibratetotreatpatientswithhypertriglyceridemiaarandomizedcrossoverstudy AT satokenjiro efficacyandsafetyofpemafibrateversusbezafibratetotreatpatientswithhypertriglyceridemiaarandomizedcrossoverstudy AT miuramasanobu efficacyandsafetyofpemafibrateversusbezafibratetotreatpatientswithhypertriglyceridemiaarandomizedcrossoverstudy AT kondomasateru efficacyandsafetyofpemafibrateversusbezafibratetotreatpatientswithhypertriglyceridemiaarandomizedcrossoverstudy AT endohideaki efficacyandsafetyofpemafibrateversusbezafibratetotreatpatientswithhypertriglyceridemiaarandomizedcrossoverstudy |