Cargando…

Comparison of Alveolar Bone Thickness, Sagittal Root Positions, and Arch Forms in Class I, II, and III Malocclusions: A Cephalometric Study

Objective: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the sagittal root position, arch shapes, and alveolar bone thickness in classes I, II, and III of skeletal patterns. Material and methods: Alveolar bone thickness, sagittal root placements, and arch morphologies in classes I, II, and III malocclu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haneen, Sumaiyya, RNG, Rajesh, Gujar, Anadha N, Kondody, Rony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10164607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37168213
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37272
_version_ 1785038105999310848
author Haneen, Sumaiyya
RNG, Rajesh
Gujar, Anadha N
Kondody, Rony
author_facet Haneen, Sumaiyya
RNG, Rajesh
Gujar, Anadha N
Kondody, Rony
author_sort Haneen, Sumaiyya
collection PubMed
description Objective: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the sagittal root position, arch shapes, and alveolar bone thickness in classes I, II, and III of skeletal patterns. Material and methods: Alveolar bone thickness, sagittal root placements, and arch morphologies in classes I, II, and III malocclusions were measured using 30 study models and 30 lateral cephalograms, both with a mean age of 16.5 years. Based on their sagittal relations, 30 participants were classified into three groups each (classes I, II, and III). The ANOVA test was used to calculate the results. Results: Between the three classes, there were statistically significant differences in the AP jaw relationship and root placements. Sagittal root location and dental arch shape showed no statistically significant correlation. Conclusion: There was no correlation between the dental arch form and sagittal root position, and classes II and III were found to have higher mandibular incisor inclination. On all levels, oval arch forms were prevalent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10164607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101646072023-05-09 Comparison of Alveolar Bone Thickness, Sagittal Root Positions, and Arch Forms in Class I, II, and III Malocclusions: A Cephalometric Study Haneen, Sumaiyya RNG, Rajesh Gujar, Anadha N Kondody, Rony Cureus Orthopedics Objective: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the sagittal root position, arch shapes, and alveolar bone thickness in classes I, II, and III of skeletal patterns. Material and methods: Alveolar bone thickness, sagittal root placements, and arch morphologies in classes I, II, and III malocclusions were measured using 30 study models and 30 lateral cephalograms, both with a mean age of 16.5 years. Based on their sagittal relations, 30 participants were classified into three groups each (classes I, II, and III). The ANOVA test was used to calculate the results. Results: Between the three classes, there were statistically significant differences in the AP jaw relationship and root placements. Sagittal root location and dental arch shape showed no statistically significant correlation. Conclusion: There was no correlation between the dental arch form and sagittal root position, and classes II and III were found to have higher mandibular incisor inclination. On all levels, oval arch forms were prevalent. Cureus 2023-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10164607/ /pubmed/37168213 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37272 Text en Copyright © 2023, Haneen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Orthopedics
Haneen, Sumaiyya
RNG, Rajesh
Gujar, Anadha N
Kondody, Rony
Comparison of Alveolar Bone Thickness, Sagittal Root Positions, and Arch Forms in Class I, II, and III Malocclusions: A Cephalometric Study
title Comparison of Alveolar Bone Thickness, Sagittal Root Positions, and Arch Forms in Class I, II, and III Malocclusions: A Cephalometric Study
title_full Comparison of Alveolar Bone Thickness, Sagittal Root Positions, and Arch Forms in Class I, II, and III Malocclusions: A Cephalometric Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Alveolar Bone Thickness, Sagittal Root Positions, and Arch Forms in Class I, II, and III Malocclusions: A Cephalometric Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Alveolar Bone Thickness, Sagittal Root Positions, and Arch Forms in Class I, II, and III Malocclusions: A Cephalometric Study
title_short Comparison of Alveolar Bone Thickness, Sagittal Root Positions, and Arch Forms in Class I, II, and III Malocclusions: A Cephalometric Study
title_sort comparison of alveolar bone thickness, sagittal root positions, and arch forms in class i, ii, and iii malocclusions: a cephalometric study
topic Orthopedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10164607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37168213
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37272
work_keys_str_mv AT haneensumaiyya comparisonofalveolarbonethicknesssagittalrootpositionsandarchformsinclassiiiandiiimalocclusionsacephalometricstudy
AT rngrajesh comparisonofalveolarbonethicknesssagittalrootpositionsandarchformsinclassiiiandiiimalocclusionsacephalometricstudy
AT gujaranadhan comparisonofalveolarbonethicknesssagittalrootpositionsandarchformsinclassiiiandiiimalocclusionsacephalometricstudy
AT kondodyrony comparisonofalveolarbonethicknesssagittalrootpositionsandarchformsinclassiiiandiiimalocclusionsacephalometricstudy