Cargando…

Critical gaps in nanoplastics research and their connection to risk assessment

Reports of plastics, at higher levels than previously thought, in the water that we drink and the air that we breathe, are generating considerable interest and concern. Plastics have been recorded in almost every environment in the world with estimates on the order of trillions of microplastic piece...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cunningham, Brittany E., Sharpe, Emma E., Brander, Susanne M., Landis, Wayne G., Harper, Stacey L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10164945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37168661
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2023.1154538
_version_ 1785038157945765888
author Cunningham, Brittany E.
Sharpe, Emma E.
Brander, Susanne M.
Landis, Wayne G.
Harper, Stacey L.
author_facet Cunningham, Brittany E.
Sharpe, Emma E.
Brander, Susanne M.
Landis, Wayne G.
Harper, Stacey L.
author_sort Cunningham, Brittany E.
collection PubMed
description Reports of plastics, at higher levels than previously thought, in the water that we drink and the air that we breathe, are generating considerable interest and concern. Plastics have been recorded in almost every environment in the world with estimates on the order of trillions of microplastic pieces. Yet, this may very well be an underestimate of plastic pollution as a whole. Once microplastics (<5 mm) break down in the environment, they nominally enter the nanoscale (<1,000 nm), where they cannot be seen by the naked eye or even with the use of a typical laboratory microscope. Thus far, research has focused on plastics in the macro- (>25 mm) and micro-size ranges, which are easier to detect and identify, leaving large knowledge gaps in our understanding of nanoplastic debris. Our ability to ask and answer questions relating to the transport, fate, and potential toxicity of these particles is disadvantaged by the detection and identification limits of current technology. Furthermore, laboratory exposures have been substantially constrained to the study of commercially available nanoplastics; i.e., polystyrene spheres, which do not adequately reflect the composition of environmental plastic debris. While a great deal of plastic-focused research has been published in recent years, the pattern of the work does not answer a number of key factors vital to calculating risk that takes into account the smallest plastic particles; namely, sources, fate and transport, exposure measures, toxicity and effects. These data are critical to inform regulatory decision making and to implement adaptive management strategies that mitigate risk to human health and the environment. This paper reviews the current state-of-the-science on nanoplastic research, highlighting areas where data are needed to establish robust risk assessments that take into account plastics pollution. Where nanoplastic-specific data are not available, suggested substitutions are indicated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10164945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101649452023-05-09 Critical gaps in nanoplastics research and their connection to risk assessment Cunningham, Brittany E. Sharpe, Emma E. Brander, Susanne M. Landis, Wayne G. Harper, Stacey L. Front Toxicol Toxicology Reports of plastics, at higher levels than previously thought, in the water that we drink and the air that we breathe, are generating considerable interest and concern. Plastics have been recorded in almost every environment in the world with estimates on the order of trillions of microplastic pieces. Yet, this may very well be an underestimate of plastic pollution as a whole. Once microplastics (<5 mm) break down in the environment, they nominally enter the nanoscale (<1,000 nm), where they cannot be seen by the naked eye or even with the use of a typical laboratory microscope. Thus far, research has focused on plastics in the macro- (>25 mm) and micro-size ranges, which are easier to detect and identify, leaving large knowledge gaps in our understanding of nanoplastic debris. Our ability to ask and answer questions relating to the transport, fate, and potential toxicity of these particles is disadvantaged by the detection and identification limits of current technology. Furthermore, laboratory exposures have been substantially constrained to the study of commercially available nanoplastics; i.e., polystyrene spheres, which do not adequately reflect the composition of environmental plastic debris. While a great deal of plastic-focused research has been published in recent years, the pattern of the work does not answer a number of key factors vital to calculating risk that takes into account the smallest plastic particles; namely, sources, fate and transport, exposure measures, toxicity and effects. These data are critical to inform regulatory decision making and to implement adaptive management strategies that mitigate risk to human health and the environment. This paper reviews the current state-of-the-science on nanoplastic research, highlighting areas where data are needed to establish robust risk assessments that take into account plastics pollution. Where nanoplastic-specific data are not available, suggested substitutions are indicated. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10164945/ /pubmed/37168661 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2023.1154538 Text en Copyright © 2023 Cunningham, Sharpe, Brander, Landis and Harper. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Toxicology
Cunningham, Brittany E.
Sharpe, Emma E.
Brander, Susanne M.
Landis, Wayne G.
Harper, Stacey L.
Critical gaps in nanoplastics research and their connection to risk assessment
title Critical gaps in nanoplastics research and their connection to risk assessment
title_full Critical gaps in nanoplastics research and their connection to risk assessment
title_fullStr Critical gaps in nanoplastics research and their connection to risk assessment
title_full_unstemmed Critical gaps in nanoplastics research and their connection to risk assessment
title_short Critical gaps in nanoplastics research and their connection to risk assessment
title_sort critical gaps in nanoplastics research and their connection to risk assessment
topic Toxicology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10164945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37168661
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2023.1154538
work_keys_str_mv AT cunninghambrittanye criticalgapsinnanoplasticsresearchandtheirconnectiontoriskassessment
AT sharpeemmae criticalgapsinnanoplasticsresearchandtheirconnectiontoriskassessment
AT brandersusannem criticalgapsinnanoplasticsresearchandtheirconnectiontoriskassessment
AT landiswayneg criticalgapsinnanoplasticsresearchandtheirconnectiontoriskassessment
AT harperstaceyl criticalgapsinnanoplasticsresearchandtheirconnectiontoriskassessment