Cargando…
Critical gaps in nanoplastics research and their connection to risk assessment
Reports of plastics, at higher levels than previously thought, in the water that we drink and the air that we breathe, are generating considerable interest and concern. Plastics have been recorded in almost every environment in the world with estimates on the order of trillions of microplastic piece...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10164945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37168661 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2023.1154538 |
_version_ | 1785038157945765888 |
---|---|
author | Cunningham, Brittany E. Sharpe, Emma E. Brander, Susanne M. Landis, Wayne G. Harper, Stacey L. |
author_facet | Cunningham, Brittany E. Sharpe, Emma E. Brander, Susanne M. Landis, Wayne G. Harper, Stacey L. |
author_sort | Cunningham, Brittany E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Reports of plastics, at higher levels than previously thought, in the water that we drink and the air that we breathe, are generating considerable interest and concern. Plastics have been recorded in almost every environment in the world with estimates on the order of trillions of microplastic pieces. Yet, this may very well be an underestimate of plastic pollution as a whole. Once microplastics (<5 mm) break down in the environment, they nominally enter the nanoscale (<1,000 nm), where they cannot be seen by the naked eye or even with the use of a typical laboratory microscope. Thus far, research has focused on plastics in the macro- (>25 mm) and micro-size ranges, which are easier to detect and identify, leaving large knowledge gaps in our understanding of nanoplastic debris. Our ability to ask and answer questions relating to the transport, fate, and potential toxicity of these particles is disadvantaged by the detection and identification limits of current technology. Furthermore, laboratory exposures have been substantially constrained to the study of commercially available nanoplastics; i.e., polystyrene spheres, which do not adequately reflect the composition of environmental plastic debris. While a great deal of plastic-focused research has been published in recent years, the pattern of the work does not answer a number of key factors vital to calculating risk that takes into account the smallest plastic particles; namely, sources, fate and transport, exposure measures, toxicity and effects. These data are critical to inform regulatory decision making and to implement adaptive management strategies that mitigate risk to human health and the environment. This paper reviews the current state-of-the-science on nanoplastic research, highlighting areas where data are needed to establish robust risk assessments that take into account plastics pollution. Where nanoplastic-specific data are not available, suggested substitutions are indicated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10164945 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101649452023-05-09 Critical gaps in nanoplastics research and their connection to risk assessment Cunningham, Brittany E. Sharpe, Emma E. Brander, Susanne M. Landis, Wayne G. Harper, Stacey L. Front Toxicol Toxicology Reports of plastics, at higher levels than previously thought, in the water that we drink and the air that we breathe, are generating considerable interest and concern. Plastics have been recorded in almost every environment in the world with estimates on the order of trillions of microplastic pieces. Yet, this may very well be an underestimate of plastic pollution as a whole. Once microplastics (<5 mm) break down in the environment, they nominally enter the nanoscale (<1,000 nm), where they cannot be seen by the naked eye or even with the use of a typical laboratory microscope. Thus far, research has focused on plastics in the macro- (>25 mm) and micro-size ranges, which are easier to detect and identify, leaving large knowledge gaps in our understanding of nanoplastic debris. Our ability to ask and answer questions relating to the transport, fate, and potential toxicity of these particles is disadvantaged by the detection and identification limits of current technology. Furthermore, laboratory exposures have been substantially constrained to the study of commercially available nanoplastics; i.e., polystyrene spheres, which do not adequately reflect the composition of environmental plastic debris. While a great deal of plastic-focused research has been published in recent years, the pattern of the work does not answer a number of key factors vital to calculating risk that takes into account the smallest plastic particles; namely, sources, fate and transport, exposure measures, toxicity and effects. These data are critical to inform regulatory decision making and to implement adaptive management strategies that mitigate risk to human health and the environment. This paper reviews the current state-of-the-science on nanoplastic research, highlighting areas where data are needed to establish robust risk assessments that take into account plastics pollution. Where nanoplastic-specific data are not available, suggested substitutions are indicated. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10164945/ /pubmed/37168661 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2023.1154538 Text en Copyright © 2023 Cunningham, Sharpe, Brander, Landis and Harper. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Toxicology Cunningham, Brittany E. Sharpe, Emma E. Brander, Susanne M. Landis, Wayne G. Harper, Stacey L. Critical gaps in nanoplastics research and their connection to risk assessment |
title | Critical gaps in nanoplastics research and their connection to risk assessment |
title_full | Critical gaps in nanoplastics research and their connection to risk assessment |
title_fullStr | Critical gaps in nanoplastics research and their connection to risk assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Critical gaps in nanoplastics research and their connection to risk assessment |
title_short | Critical gaps in nanoplastics research and their connection to risk assessment |
title_sort | critical gaps in nanoplastics research and their connection to risk assessment |
topic | Toxicology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10164945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37168661 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2023.1154538 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cunninghambrittanye criticalgapsinnanoplasticsresearchandtheirconnectiontoriskassessment AT sharpeemmae criticalgapsinnanoplasticsresearchandtheirconnectiontoriskassessment AT brandersusannem criticalgapsinnanoplasticsresearchandtheirconnectiontoriskassessment AT landiswayneg criticalgapsinnanoplasticsresearchandtheirconnectiontoriskassessment AT harperstaceyl criticalgapsinnanoplasticsresearchandtheirconnectiontoriskassessment |