Cargando…

The choice of new treatments in autoimmune hemolytic anemia: how to pick from the basket?

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is defined by increased erythrocyte turnover mediated by autoimmune mechanisms. While corticosteroids remain first-line therapy in most cases of warm-antibody AIHA, cold agglutinin disease is treated by targeting the underlying clonal B-cell proliferation or the cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berentsen, Sigbjørn, Fattizzo, Bruno, Barcellini, Wilma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10165002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37168855
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1180509
_version_ 1785038171975712768
author Berentsen, Sigbjørn
Fattizzo, Bruno
Barcellini, Wilma
author_facet Berentsen, Sigbjørn
Fattizzo, Bruno
Barcellini, Wilma
author_sort Berentsen, Sigbjørn
collection PubMed
description Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is defined by increased erythrocyte turnover mediated by autoimmune mechanisms. While corticosteroids remain first-line therapy in most cases of warm-antibody AIHA, cold agglutinin disease is treated by targeting the underlying clonal B-cell proliferation or the classical complement activation pathway. Several new established or investigational drugs and treatment regimens have appeared during the last 1-2 decades, resulting in an improvement of therapy options but also raising challenges on how to select the best treatment in individual patients. In severe warm-antibody AIHA, there is evidence for the upfront addition of rituximab to prednisolone in the first line. Novel agents targeting B-cells, extravascular hemolysis, or removing IgG will offer further options in the acute and relapsed/refractory settings. In cold agglutinin disease, the development of complement inhibitors and B-cell targeting agents makes it possible to individualize therapy, based on the disease profile and patient characteristics. For most AIHAs, the optimal treatment remains to be found, and there is still a need for more evidence-based therapies. Therefore, prospective clinical trials should be encouraged.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10165002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101650022023-05-09 The choice of new treatments in autoimmune hemolytic anemia: how to pick from the basket? Berentsen, Sigbjørn Fattizzo, Bruno Barcellini, Wilma Front Immunol Immunology Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is defined by increased erythrocyte turnover mediated by autoimmune mechanisms. While corticosteroids remain first-line therapy in most cases of warm-antibody AIHA, cold agglutinin disease is treated by targeting the underlying clonal B-cell proliferation or the classical complement activation pathway. Several new established or investigational drugs and treatment regimens have appeared during the last 1-2 decades, resulting in an improvement of therapy options but also raising challenges on how to select the best treatment in individual patients. In severe warm-antibody AIHA, there is evidence for the upfront addition of rituximab to prednisolone in the first line. Novel agents targeting B-cells, extravascular hemolysis, or removing IgG will offer further options in the acute and relapsed/refractory settings. In cold agglutinin disease, the development of complement inhibitors and B-cell targeting agents makes it possible to individualize therapy, based on the disease profile and patient characteristics. For most AIHAs, the optimal treatment remains to be found, and there is still a need for more evidence-based therapies. Therefore, prospective clinical trials should be encouraged. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10165002/ /pubmed/37168855 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1180509 Text en Copyright © 2023 Berentsen, Fattizzo and Barcellini https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Berentsen, Sigbjørn
Fattizzo, Bruno
Barcellini, Wilma
The choice of new treatments in autoimmune hemolytic anemia: how to pick from the basket?
title The choice of new treatments in autoimmune hemolytic anemia: how to pick from the basket?
title_full The choice of new treatments in autoimmune hemolytic anemia: how to pick from the basket?
title_fullStr The choice of new treatments in autoimmune hemolytic anemia: how to pick from the basket?
title_full_unstemmed The choice of new treatments in autoimmune hemolytic anemia: how to pick from the basket?
title_short The choice of new treatments in autoimmune hemolytic anemia: how to pick from the basket?
title_sort choice of new treatments in autoimmune hemolytic anemia: how to pick from the basket?
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10165002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37168855
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1180509
work_keys_str_mv AT berentsensigbjørn thechoiceofnewtreatmentsinautoimmunehemolyticanemiahowtopickfromthebasket
AT fattizzobruno thechoiceofnewtreatmentsinautoimmunehemolyticanemiahowtopickfromthebasket
AT barcelliniwilma thechoiceofnewtreatmentsinautoimmunehemolyticanemiahowtopickfromthebasket
AT berentsensigbjørn choiceofnewtreatmentsinautoimmunehemolyticanemiahowtopickfromthebasket
AT fattizzobruno choiceofnewtreatmentsinautoimmunehemolyticanemiahowtopickfromthebasket
AT barcelliniwilma choiceofnewtreatmentsinautoimmunehemolyticanemiahowtopickfromthebasket