Cargando…
Evaluation of functional and aesthetic outcomes of free dermal fat graft versus superficial musculoaponeurotic system flap after superficial parotidectomy: randomized clinical trial
BACKGROUND: Parotidectomy is the standard procedure for treatment of many parotid lesions; however, it has several drawbacks. Facial asymmetry and Frey’s syndrome are the most annoying complications to patients. Insertion of interpositioning grafts into the parotidectomy bed can decrease these compl...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10165060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37151084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac173 |
_version_ | 1785038187368808448 |
---|---|
author | Fawzy, Ahmed Balbaa, M Ashraf Hagag, Mahmoud |
author_facet | Fawzy, Ahmed Balbaa, M Ashraf Hagag, Mahmoud |
author_sort | Fawzy, Ahmed |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Parotidectomy is the standard procedure for treatment of many parotid lesions; however, it has several drawbacks. Facial asymmetry and Frey’s syndrome are the most annoying complications to patients. Insertion of interpositioning grafts into the parotidectomy bed can decrease these complications significantly. Free dermal fat graft (FDFG) and superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) flap have very promising results. This RCT aimed to compare these two techniques regarding functional and aesthetic outcomes. METHODS: Between February 2016 and October 2021, adult patients undergoing superficial conservative parotidectomy in a single centre for a benign indication were randomized into two equal groups using a closed envelope method. In one group, FDFG was inserted at the parotidectomy bed, whereas, in the other group, SMAS flap was performed. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative data were recorded and analysed. The primary outcome was the development of Frey's syndrome. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were randomized into two equal groups of 39 patients. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding development of Frey's syndrome. There was no significant statistical difference between study groups regarding demographic data, co-morbidities, parotid pathologies, specimen volumes, total operating time, and postoperative complications. A tendency for over correction was observed in FDFG and under correction in SMAS flap. There was no statistically significant difference between the study groups regarding the patients’ aesthetic satisfaction with the majority displaying excellent satisfaction with no poor results. CONCLUSION: FDFG and SMAS flap are simple, rapid, and reliable procedures and are effective in improving both functional and aesthetic outcomes post-parotidectomy. They have comparable results; however, selection of either procedure can be determined according to patient and tumour characteristics. Registration number: NCT05452837 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10165060 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101650602023-05-09 Evaluation of functional and aesthetic outcomes of free dermal fat graft versus superficial musculoaponeurotic system flap after superficial parotidectomy: randomized clinical trial Fawzy, Ahmed Balbaa, M Ashraf Hagag, Mahmoud BJS Open Randomized Clinical Trial BACKGROUND: Parotidectomy is the standard procedure for treatment of many parotid lesions; however, it has several drawbacks. Facial asymmetry and Frey’s syndrome are the most annoying complications to patients. Insertion of interpositioning grafts into the parotidectomy bed can decrease these complications significantly. Free dermal fat graft (FDFG) and superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) flap have very promising results. This RCT aimed to compare these two techniques regarding functional and aesthetic outcomes. METHODS: Between February 2016 and October 2021, adult patients undergoing superficial conservative parotidectomy in a single centre for a benign indication were randomized into two equal groups using a closed envelope method. In one group, FDFG was inserted at the parotidectomy bed, whereas, in the other group, SMAS flap was performed. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative data were recorded and analysed. The primary outcome was the development of Frey's syndrome. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were randomized into two equal groups of 39 patients. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding development of Frey's syndrome. There was no significant statistical difference between study groups regarding demographic data, co-morbidities, parotid pathologies, specimen volumes, total operating time, and postoperative complications. A tendency for over correction was observed in FDFG and under correction in SMAS flap. There was no statistically significant difference between the study groups regarding the patients’ aesthetic satisfaction with the majority displaying excellent satisfaction with no poor results. CONCLUSION: FDFG and SMAS flap are simple, rapid, and reliable procedures and are effective in improving both functional and aesthetic outcomes post-parotidectomy. They have comparable results; however, selection of either procedure can be determined according to patient and tumour characteristics. Registration number: NCT05452837 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov) Oxford University Press 2023-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10165060/ /pubmed/37151084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac173 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Randomized Clinical Trial Fawzy, Ahmed Balbaa, M Ashraf Hagag, Mahmoud Evaluation of functional and aesthetic outcomes of free dermal fat graft versus superficial musculoaponeurotic system flap after superficial parotidectomy: randomized clinical trial |
title | Evaluation of functional and aesthetic outcomes of free dermal fat graft versus superficial musculoaponeurotic system flap after superficial parotidectomy: randomized clinical trial |
title_full | Evaluation of functional and aesthetic outcomes of free dermal fat graft versus superficial musculoaponeurotic system flap after superficial parotidectomy: randomized clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of functional and aesthetic outcomes of free dermal fat graft versus superficial musculoaponeurotic system flap after superficial parotidectomy: randomized clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of functional and aesthetic outcomes of free dermal fat graft versus superficial musculoaponeurotic system flap after superficial parotidectomy: randomized clinical trial |
title_short | Evaluation of functional and aesthetic outcomes of free dermal fat graft versus superficial musculoaponeurotic system flap after superficial parotidectomy: randomized clinical trial |
title_sort | evaluation of functional and aesthetic outcomes of free dermal fat graft versus superficial musculoaponeurotic system flap after superficial parotidectomy: randomized clinical trial |
topic | Randomized Clinical Trial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10165060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37151084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac173 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fawzyahmed evaluationoffunctionalandaestheticoutcomesoffreedermalfatgraftversussuperficialmusculoaponeuroticsystemflapaftersuperficialparotidectomyrandomizedclinicaltrial AT balbaamashraf evaluationoffunctionalandaestheticoutcomesoffreedermalfatgraftversussuperficialmusculoaponeuroticsystemflapaftersuperficialparotidectomyrandomizedclinicaltrial AT hagagmahmoud evaluationoffunctionalandaestheticoutcomesoffreedermalfatgraftversussuperficialmusculoaponeuroticsystemflapaftersuperficialparotidectomyrandomizedclinicaltrial |