Cargando…

Comparison of ultrasound−based ADNEX model with magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating adnexal masses: a multi-center study

OBJECTIVES: The ADNEX model offered a good diagnostic performance for discriminating adnexal tumors, but research comparing the abilities of the ADNEX model and MRI for characterizing adnexal tumors has not been reported to our knowledge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Yanli, Chen, Bo, Dong, Hongmei, Sheng, Bo, Xiao, Zhibo, Li, Jia, Tian, Wei, Lv, Furong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10165107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37168367
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1101297
_version_ 1785038199270146048
author Hu, Yanli
Chen, Bo
Dong, Hongmei
Sheng, Bo
Xiao, Zhibo
Li, Jia
Tian, Wei
Lv, Furong
author_facet Hu, Yanli
Chen, Bo
Dong, Hongmei
Sheng, Bo
Xiao, Zhibo
Li, Jia
Tian, Wei
Lv, Furong
author_sort Hu, Yanli
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The ADNEX model offered a good diagnostic performance for discriminating adnexal tumors, but research comparing the abilities of the ADNEX model and MRI for characterizing adnexal tumors has not been reported to our knowledge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the ultrasound-based ADNEX (Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa) model in comparison with that of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for differentiating benign, borderline and malignant adnexal masses. METHODS: This prospective study included 529 women with adnexal masses who underwent assessment via the ADNEX model and subjective MRI analysis before surgical treatment between October 2019 and April 2022 at two hospitals. Postoperative histological diagnosis was considered the gold standard. RESULTS: Among the 529 women, 92 (17.4%) masses were diagnosed histologically as malignant tumors, 67 (12.7%) as borderline tumors, and 370 (69.9%) as benign tumors. For the diagnosis of malignancy, including borderline tumors, overall agreement between the ADNEX model and MRI pre-operation was 84.9%. The sensitivity of the ADNEX model of 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85–0.95) was similar to that of MRI (0.89, 95% CI: 0.84–0.94; P=0.717). However, the ADNEX model had a higher specificity (0.90, 95% CI: 0.87–0.93) than MRI (0.81, 95% CI: 0.77–0.85; P=0.001). The greatest sensitivity (0.96, 95% CI: 0.92–0.99) and specificity (0.94, 95% CI: 0.91–0.96) were achieved by combining the ADNEX model and subjective MRI assessment. While the total diagnostic accuracy did not differ significantly between the two methods (P=0.059), the ADNEX model showed greater diagnostic accuracy for borderline tumors (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The ultrasound-based ADNEX model demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance for adnexal tumors, especially borderline tumors, compared with MRI. Accordingly, we recommend that the ADNEX model, alone or with subjective MRI assessment, should be used for pre-operative assessment of adnexal masses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10165107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101651072023-05-09 Comparison of ultrasound−based ADNEX model with magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating adnexal masses: a multi-center study Hu, Yanli Chen, Bo Dong, Hongmei Sheng, Bo Xiao, Zhibo Li, Jia Tian, Wei Lv, Furong Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVES: The ADNEX model offered a good diagnostic performance for discriminating adnexal tumors, but research comparing the abilities of the ADNEX model and MRI for characterizing adnexal tumors has not been reported to our knowledge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the ultrasound-based ADNEX (Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa) model in comparison with that of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for differentiating benign, borderline and malignant adnexal masses. METHODS: This prospective study included 529 women with adnexal masses who underwent assessment via the ADNEX model and subjective MRI analysis before surgical treatment between October 2019 and April 2022 at two hospitals. Postoperative histological diagnosis was considered the gold standard. RESULTS: Among the 529 women, 92 (17.4%) masses were diagnosed histologically as malignant tumors, 67 (12.7%) as borderline tumors, and 370 (69.9%) as benign tumors. For the diagnosis of malignancy, including borderline tumors, overall agreement between the ADNEX model and MRI pre-operation was 84.9%. The sensitivity of the ADNEX model of 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85–0.95) was similar to that of MRI (0.89, 95% CI: 0.84–0.94; P=0.717). However, the ADNEX model had a higher specificity (0.90, 95% CI: 0.87–0.93) than MRI (0.81, 95% CI: 0.77–0.85; P=0.001). The greatest sensitivity (0.96, 95% CI: 0.92–0.99) and specificity (0.94, 95% CI: 0.91–0.96) were achieved by combining the ADNEX model and subjective MRI assessment. While the total diagnostic accuracy did not differ significantly between the two methods (P=0.059), the ADNEX model showed greater diagnostic accuracy for borderline tumors (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The ultrasound-based ADNEX model demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance for adnexal tumors, especially borderline tumors, compared with MRI. Accordingly, we recommend that the ADNEX model, alone or with subjective MRI assessment, should be used for pre-operative assessment of adnexal masses. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10165107/ /pubmed/37168367 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1101297 Text en Copyright © 2023 Hu, Chen, Dong, Sheng, Xiao, Li, Tian and Lv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Hu, Yanli
Chen, Bo
Dong, Hongmei
Sheng, Bo
Xiao, Zhibo
Li, Jia
Tian, Wei
Lv, Furong
Comparison of ultrasound−based ADNEX model with magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating adnexal masses: a multi-center study
title Comparison of ultrasound−based ADNEX model with magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating adnexal masses: a multi-center study
title_full Comparison of ultrasound−based ADNEX model with magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating adnexal masses: a multi-center study
title_fullStr Comparison of ultrasound−based ADNEX model with magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating adnexal masses: a multi-center study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of ultrasound−based ADNEX model with magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating adnexal masses: a multi-center study
title_short Comparison of ultrasound−based ADNEX model with magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating adnexal masses: a multi-center study
title_sort comparison of ultrasound−based adnex model with magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating adnexal masses: a multi-center study
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10165107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37168367
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1101297
work_keys_str_mv AT huyanli comparisonofultrasoundbasedadnexmodelwithmagneticresonanceimagingfordiscriminatingadnexalmassesamulticenterstudy
AT chenbo comparisonofultrasoundbasedadnexmodelwithmagneticresonanceimagingfordiscriminatingadnexalmassesamulticenterstudy
AT donghongmei comparisonofultrasoundbasedadnexmodelwithmagneticresonanceimagingfordiscriminatingadnexalmassesamulticenterstudy
AT shengbo comparisonofultrasoundbasedadnexmodelwithmagneticresonanceimagingfordiscriminatingadnexalmassesamulticenterstudy
AT xiaozhibo comparisonofultrasoundbasedadnexmodelwithmagneticresonanceimagingfordiscriminatingadnexalmassesamulticenterstudy
AT lijia comparisonofultrasoundbasedadnexmodelwithmagneticresonanceimagingfordiscriminatingadnexalmassesamulticenterstudy
AT tianwei comparisonofultrasoundbasedadnexmodelwithmagneticresonanceimagingfordiscriminatingadnexalmassesamulticenterstudy
AT lvfurong comparisonofultrasoundbasedadnexmodelwithmagneticresonanceimagingfordiscriminatingadnexalmassesamulticenterstudy