Cargando…
General improvements versus interruptive or non-interruptive alerts in the blood order set: study protocol for a randomized control trial to improve packed red blood cell utilization
BACKGROUND: Blood transfusions can serve as a life-saving treatment, but inappropriate blood product transfusions can result in patient harm and excess costs for health systems. Despite published evidence supporting restricted packed red blood cell (pRBC) usage, many providers transfuse outside of g...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10165805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37158929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07319-8 |
_version_ | 1785038320406888448 |
---|---|
author | Mistry, Neelam Richardson, Vanessa Carey, Evan Porter, Samuel Pincus, Sharon Novins-Montague, Sylvie Elmer, Megan Lin, Chen-Tan Ho, P. Michael Anstett, Tyler |
author_facet | Mistry, Neelam Richardson, Vanessa Carey, Evan Porter, Samuel Pincus, Sharon Novins-Montague, Sylvie Elmer, Megan Lin, Chen-Tan Ho, P. Michael Anstett, Tyler |
author_sort | Mistry, Neelam |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Blood transfusions can serve as a life-saving treatment, but inappropriate blood product transfusions can result in patient harm and excess costs for health systems. Despite published evidence supporting restricted packed red blood cell (pRBC) usage, many providers transfuse outside of guidelines. Here, we report a novel prospective, randomized control trial to increase guideline-concordant pRBC transfusions comparing three variations of clinical decision support (CDS) in the electronic health record (EHR). METHODS: All inpatient providers at University of Colorado Hospital (UCH) who order blood transfusions were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to the three arms of the study: (1) general order set improvements, (2) general order set improvements plus non-interruptive in-line help text alert, and (3) general order set improvements plus interruptive alert. Transfusing providers received the same randomized order set changes for 18 months. The primary outcome of this study is the guideline-concordant rate of pRBC transfusions. The primary objective of this study is to compare the group using the new interface (arm 1) versus the two groups using the new interface with interruptive or non-interruptive alerts (arms 2 and 3, combined). The secondary objectives compare guideline-concordant transfusion rates between arm 2 and arm 3 as well as comparing all of arms of the study in aggregate to historical controls. This trial concluded after 12 months on April 5, 2022. DISCUSSION: CDS tools can increase guideline-concordant behavior. This trial will examine three different CDS tools to determine which type is most effective at increasing guideline-concordant blood transfusions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov 3/20/21, NCT04823273. Approved by University of Colorado Institutional Review Board (19–0918), protocol version 1 4/19/2019, approved 4/30/2019. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10165805 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101658052023-05-09 General improvements versus interruptive or non-interruptive alerts in the blood order set: study protocol for a randomized control trial to improve packed red blood cell utilization Mistry, Neelam Richardson, Vanessa Carey, Evan Porter, Samuel Pincus, Sharon Novins-Montague, Sylvie Elmer, Megan Lin, Chen-Tan Ho, P. Michael Anstett, Tyler Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Blood transfusions can serve as a life-saving treatment, but inappropriate blood product transfusions can result in patient harm and excess costs for health systems. Despite published evidence supporting restricted packed red blood cell (pRBC) usage, many providers transfuse outside of guidelines. Here, we report a novel prospective, randomized control trial to increase guideline-concordant pRBC transfusions comparing three variations of clinical decision support (CDS) in the electronic health record (EHR). METHODS: All inpatient providers at University of Colorado Hospital (UCH) who order blood transfusions were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to the three arms of the study: (1) general order set improvements, (2) general order set improvements plus non-interruptive in-line help text alert, and (3) general order set improvements plus interruptive alert. Transfusing providers received the same randomized order set changes for 18 months. The primary outcome of this study is the guideline-concordant rate of pRBC transfusions. The primary objective of this study is to compare the group using the new interface (arm 1) versus the two groups using the new interface with interruptive or non-interruptive alerts (arms 2 and 3, combined). The secondary objectives compare guideline-concordant transfusion rates between arm 2 and arm 3 as well as comparing all of arms of the study in aggregate to historical controls. This trial concluded after 12 months on April 5, 2022. DISCUSSION: CDS tools can increase guideline-concordant behavior. This trial will examine three different CDS tools to determine which type is most effective at increasing guideline-concordant blood transfusions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov 3/20/21, NCT04823273. Approved by University of Colorado Institutional Review Board (19–0918), protocol version 1 4/19/2019, approved 4/30/2019. BioMed Central 2023-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10165805/ /pubmed/37158929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07319-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Mistry, Neelam Richardson, Vanessa Carey, Evan Porter, Samuel Pincus, Sharon Novins-Montague, Sylvie Elmer, Megan Lin, Chen-Tan Ho, P. Michael Anstett, Tyler General improvements versus interruptive or non-interruptive alerts in the blood order set: study protocol for a randomized control trial to improve packed red blood cell utilization |
title | General improvements versus interruptive or non-interruptive alerts in the blood order set: study protocol for a randomized control trial to improve packed red blood cell utilization |
title_full | General improvements versus interruptive or non-interruptive alerts in the blood order set: study protocol for a randomized control trial to improve packed red blood cell utilization |
title_fullStr | General improvements versus interruptive or non-interruptive alerts in the blood order set: study protocol for a randomized control trial to improve packed red blood cell utilization |
title_full_unstemmed | General improvements versus interruptive or non-interruptive alerts in the blood order set: study protocol for a randomized control trial to improve packed red blood cell utilization |
title_short | General improvements versus interruptive or non-interruptive alerts in the blood order set: study protocol for a randomized control trial to improve packed red blood cell utilization |
title_sort | general improvements versus interruptive or non-interruptive alerts in the blood order set: study protocol for a randomized control trial to improve packed red blood cell utilization |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10165805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37158929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07319-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mistryneelam generalimprovementsversusinterruptiveornoninterruptivealertsinthebloodordersetstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontroltrialtoimprovepackedredbloodcellutilization AT richardsonvanessa generalimprovementsversusinterruptiveornoninterruptivealertsinthebloodordersetstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontroltrialtoimprovepackedredbloodcellutilization AT careyevan generalimprovementsversusinterruptiveornoninterruptivealertsinthebloodordersetstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontroltrialtoimprovepackedredbloodcellutilization AT portersamuel generalimprovementsversusinterruptiveornoninterruptivealertsinthebloodordersetstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontroltrialtoimprovepackedredbloodcellutilization AT pincussharon generalimprovementsversusinterruptiveornoninterruptivealertsinthebloodordersetstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontroltrialtoimprovepackedredbloodcellutilization AT novinsmontaguesylvie generalimprovementsversusinterruptiveornoninterruptivealertsinthebloodordersetstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontroltrialtoimprovepackedredbloodcellutilization AT elmermegan generalimprovementsversusinterruptiveornoninterruptivealertsinthebloodordersetstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontroltrialtoimprovepackedredbloodcellutilization AT linchentan generalimprovementsversusinterruptiveornoninterruptivealertsinthebloodordersetstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontroltrialtoimprovepackedredbloodcellutilization AT hopmichael generalimprovementsversusinterruptiveornoninterruptivealertsinthebloodordersetstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontroltrialtoimprovepackedredbloodcellutilization AT anstetttyler generalimprovementsversusinterruptiveornoninterruptivealertsinthebloodordersetstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontroltrialtoimprovepackedredbloodcellutilization |