Cargando…

General improvements versus interruptive or non-interruptive alerts in the blood order set: study protocol for a randomized control trial to improve packed red blood cell utilization

BACKGROUND: Blood transfusions can serve as a life-saving treatment, but inappropriate blood product transfusions can result in patient harm and excess costs for health systems. Despite published evidence supporting restricted packed red blood cell (pRBC) usage, many providers transfuse outside of g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mistry, Neelam, Richardson, Vanessa, Carey, Evan, Porter, Samuel, Pincus, Sharon, Novins-Montague, Sylvie, Elmer, Megan, Lin, Chen-Tan, Ho, P. Michael, Anstett, Tyler
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10165805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37158929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07319-8
_version_ 1785038320406888448
author Mistry, Neelam
Richardson, Vanessa
Carey, Evan
Porter, Samuel
Pincus, Sharon
Novins-Montague, Sylvie
Elmer, Megan
Lin, Chen-Tan
Ho, P. Michael
Anstett, Tyler
author_facet Mistry, Neelam
Richardson, Vanessa
Carey, Evan
Porter, Samuel
Pincus, Sharon
Novins-Montague, Sylvie
Elmer, Megan
Lin, Chen-Tan
Ho, P. Michael
Anstett, Tyler
author_sort Mistry, Neelam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Blood transfusions can serve as a life-saving treatment, but inappropriate blood product transfusions can result in patient harm and excess costs for health systems. Despite published evidence supporting restricted packed red blood cell (pRBC) usage, many providers transfuse outside of guidelines. Here, we report a novel prospective, randomized control trial to increase guideline-concordant pRBC transfusions comparing three variations of clinical decision support (CDS) in the electronic health record (EHR). METHODS: All inpatient providers at University of Colorado Hospital (UCH) who order blood transfusions were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to the three arms of the study: (1) general order set improvements, (2) general order set improvements plus non-interruptive in-line help text alert, and (3) general order set improvements plus interruptive alert. Transfusing providers received the same randomized order set changes for 18 months. The primary outcome of this study is the guideline-concordant rate of pRBC transfusions. The primary objective of this study is to compare the group using the new interface (arm 1) versus the two groups using the new interface with interruptive or non-interruptive alerts (arms 2 and 3, combined). The secondary objectives compare guideline-concordant transfusion rates between arm 2 and arm 3 as well as comparing all of arms of the study in aggregate to historical controls. This trial concluded after 12 months on April 5, 2022. DISCUSSION: CDS tools can increase guideline-concordant behavior. This trial will examine three different CDS tools to determine which type is most effective at increasing guideline-concordant blood transfusions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov 3/20/21, NCT04823273. Approved by University of Colorado Institutional Review Board (19–0918), protocol version 1 4/19/2019, approved 4/30/2019.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10165805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101658052023-05-09 General improvements versus interruptive or non-interruptive alerts in the blood order set: study protocol for a randomized control trial to improve packed red blood cell utilization Mistry, Neelam Richardson, Vanessa Carey, Evan Porter, Samuel Pincus, Sharon Novins-Montague, Sylvie Elmer, Megan Lin, Chen-Tan Ho, P. Michael Anstett, Tyler Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Blood transfusions can serve as a life-saving treatment, but inappropriate blood product transfusions can result in patient harm and excess costs for health systems. Despite published evidence supporting restricted packed red blood cell (pRBC) usage, many providers transfuse outside of guidelines. Here, we report a novel prospective, randomized control trial to increase guideline-concordant pRBC transfusions comparing three variations of clinical decision support (CDS) in the electronic health record (EHR). METHODS: All inpatient providers at University of Colorado Hospital (UCH) who order blood transfusions were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to the three arms of the study: (1) general order set improvements, (2) general order set improvements plus non-interruptive in-line help text alert, and (3) general order set improvements plus interruptive alert. Transfusing providers received the same randomized order set changes for 18 months. The primary outcome of this study is the guideline-concordant rate of pRBC transfusions. The primary objective of this study is to compare the group using the new interface (arm 1) versus the two groups using the new interface with interruptive or non-interruptive alerts (arms 2 and 3, combined). The secondary objectives compare guideline-concordant transfusion rates between arm 2 and arm 3 as well as comparing all of arms of the study in aggregate to historical controls. This trial concluded after 12 months on April 5, 2022. DISCUSSION: CDS tools can increase guideline-concordant behavior. This trial will examine three different CDS tools to determine which type is most effective at increasing guideline-concordant blood transfusions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov 3/20/21, NCT04823273. Approved by University of Colorado Institutional Review Board (19–0918), protocol version 1 4/19/2019, approved 4/30/2019. BioMed Central 2023-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10165805/ /pubmed/37158929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07319-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Mistry, Neelam
Richardson, Vanessa
Carey, Evan
Porter, Samuel
Pincus, Sharon
Novins-Montague, Sylvie
Elmer, Megan
Lin, Chen-Tan
Ho, P. Michael
Anstett, Tyler
General improvements versus interruptive or non-interruptive alerts in the blood order set: study protocol for a randomized control trial to improve packed red blood cell utilization
title General improvements versus interruptive or non-interruptive alerts in the blood order set: study protocol for a randomized control trial to improve packed red blood cell utilization
title_full General improvements versus interruptive or non-interruptive alerts in the blood order set: study protocol for a randomized control trial to improve packed red blood cell utilization
title_fullStr General improvements versus interruptive or non-interruptive alerts in the blood order set: study protocol for a randomized control trial to improve packed red blood cell utilization
title_full_unstemmed General improvements versus interruptive or non-interruptive alerts in the blood order set: study protocol for a randomized control trial to improve packed red blood cell utilization
title_short General improvements versus interruptive or non-interruptive alerts in the blood order set: study protocol for a randomized control trial to improve packed red blood cell utilization
title_sort general improvements versus interruptive or non-interruptive alerts in the blood order set: study protocol for a randomized control trial to improve packed red blood cell utilization
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10165805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37158929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07319-8
work_keys_str_mv AT mistryneelam generalimprovementsversusinterruptiveornoninterruptivealertsinthebloodordersetstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontroltrialtoimprovepackedredbloodcellutilization
AT richardsonvanessa generalimprovementsversusinterruptiveornoninterruptivealertsinthebloodordersetstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontroltrialtoimprovepackedredbloodcellutilization
AT careyevan generalimprovementsversusinterruptiveornoninterruptivealertsinthebloodordersetstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontroltrialtoimprovepackedredbloodcellutilization
AT portersamuel generalimprovementsversusinterruptiveornoninterruptivealertsinthebloodordersetstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontroltrialtoimprovepackedredbloodcellutilization
AT pincussharon generalimprovementsversusinterruptiveornoninterruptivealertsinthebloodordersetstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontroltrialtoimprovepackedredbloodcellutilization
AT novinsmontaguesylvie generalimprovementsversusinterruptiveornoninterruptivealertsinthebloodordersetstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontroltrialtoimprovepackedredbloodcellutilization
AT elmermegan generalimprovementsversusinterruptiveornoninterruptivealertsinthebloodordersetstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontroltrialtoimprovepackedredbloodcellutilization
AT linchentan generalimprovementsversusinterruptiveornoninterruptivealertsinthebloodordersetstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontroltrialtoimprovepackedredbloodcellutilization
AT hopmichael generalimprovementsversusinterruptiveornoninterruptivealertsinthebloodordersetstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontroltrialtoimprovepackedredbloodcellutilization
AT anstetttyler generalimprovementsversusinterruptiveornoninterruptivealertsinthebloodordersetstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontroltrialtoimprovepackedredbloodcellutilization