Cargando…

Proton Therapy for Bilateral Breast Cancer Maximizes Normal-Tissue Sparing

PURPOSE: Treatment for bilateral breast cancer with radiation therapy is technically challenging. We evaluated the clinical and dosimetric outcomes of a small series of patients with synchronous bilateral breast cancer, including a photon dosimetric comparison, to identify optimal treatment planning...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brooks, Eric D., Mailhot Vega, Raymond B., Vivers, Emma, Burchianti, Teena, Liang, Xiaoying, Spiguel, Lisa R., Jasra, Bharti, Mendenhall, Nancy P., Oladeru, Oluwadamilola T., Bradley, Julie A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Particle Therapy Co-operative Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37169011
http://dx.doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-22-00041.1
_version_ 1785038357482438656
author Brooks, Eric D.
Mailhot Vega, Raymond B.
Vivers, Emma
Burchianti, Teena
Liang, Xiaoying
Spiguel, Lisa R.
Jasra, Bharti
Mendenhall, Nancy P.
Oladeru, Oluwadamilola T.
Bradley, Julie A.
author_facet Brooks, Eric D.
Mailhot Vega, Raymond B.
Vivers, Emma
Burchianti, Teena
Liang, Xiaoying
Spiguel, Lisa R.
Jasra, Bharti
Mendenhall, Nancy P.
Oladeru, Oluwadamilola T.
Bradley, Julie A.
author_sort Brooks, Eric D.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Treatment for bilateral breast cancer with radiation therapy is technically challenging. We evaluated the clinical and dosimetric outcomes of a small series of patients with synchronous bilateral breast cancer, including a photon dosimetric comparison, to identify optimal treatment planning approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed a registry of patients (simultaneously) diagnosed with synchronous bilateral breast cancers who underwent postoperative definitive adjuvant proton therapy at our institution between 2012 and 2021. All patients were treated with double-scattered proton or pencil-beam scanning therapies. For comparison, intensity-modulated radiation therapy photon plans optimized for organ sparing and coverage were generated after treatment. RESULTS: Six patients were included. The median patient age was 66 years; all were female with no history of breast cancer or radiation therapy. Two (33%) patients received breast/chest wall–only treatments, 1 (17%) required breast plus level I axillary treatment to one side and breast plus regional nodal irradiation (RNI) to the other, and 3 (50%) received bilateral breast/chest plus RNI; dosimetric results are reported for each group's median. Analysis showed clinical target coverage was comparable between proton and photon techniques (V95% of 96.4% with proton, 97.8% with photon). However, protons could deliver superior organ sparing at clinically relevant dose metrics for virtually all structures: a 6.7 Gy absolute reduction in the mean heart dose (7.5 Gy with photons to 0.7 Gy with protons), a 47% to 57% relative reduction in D(0.1cm3) to coronary arteries, a 54% relative reduction in lung V20 Gy, and an absolute 7.6 Gy reduction to the brachial plexus. There was also greater esophagus and spinal cord sparing. The overall survival rate was 100% at 1.5 years of median follow-up (0.5-4.9), and all patients were free of disease. For toxicity, all patients had some form of acute side effects: 66% experienced grade 2 breast/chest pain or soreness; 100% had grade 2 radiation dermatitis or skin induration; 33% had grade 2 fatigue; and 17% had grade 2 esophagitis (per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] version 5.0; US National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland). Subacute toxicity (within 6 months) was observed for 17% of patients with delayed onset of grade 3 dermatitis in the setting of preexisting lupus, 17% with a delayed surgical wound complication, and 17% with grade 2 soft tissue fibrosis. No grade 4 or 5 events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial dose reductions to multiple organs at risk while maintaining target coverage make proton the preferred modality for bilateral breast cancer treatment when available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10166012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Particle Therapy Co-operative Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101660122023-05-09 Proton Therapy for Bilateral Breast Cancer Maximizes Normal-Tissue Sparing Brooks, Eric D. Mailhot Vega, Raymond B. Vivers, Emma Burchianti, Teena Liang, Xiaoying Spiguel, Lisa R. Jasra, Bharti Mendenhall, Nancy P. Oladeru, Oluwadamilola T. Bradley, Julie A. Int J Part Ther Original Articles PURPOSE: Treatment for bilateral breast cancer with radiation therapy is technically challenging. We evaluated the clinical and dosimetric outcomes of a small series of patients with synchronous bilateral breast cancer, including a photon dosimetric comparison, to identify optimal treatment planning approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed a registry of patients (simultaneously) diagnosed with synchronous bilateral breast cancers who underwent postoperative definitive adjuvant proton therapy at our institution between 2012 and 2021. All patients were treated with double-scattered proton or pencil-beam scanning therapies. For comparison, intensity-modulated radiation therapy photon plans optimized for organ sparing and coverage were generated after treatment. RESULTS: Six patients were included. The median patient age was 66 years; all were female with no history of breast cancer or radiation therapy. Two (33%) patients received breast/chest wall–only treatments, 1 (17%) required breast plus level I axillary treatment to one side and breast plus regional nodal irradiation (RNI) to the other, and 3 (50%) received bilateral breast/chest plus RNI; dosimetric results are reported for each group's median. Analysis showed clinical target coverage was comparable between proton and photon techniques (V95% of 96.4% with proton, 97.8% with photon). However, protons could deliver superior organ sparing at clinically relevant dose metrics for virtually all structures: a 6.7 Gy absolute reduction in the mean heart dose (7.5 Gy with photons to 0.7 Gy with protons), a 47% to 57% relative reduction in D(0.1cm3) to coronary arteries, a 54% relative reduction in lung V20 Gy, and an absolute 7.6 Gy reduction to the brachial plexus. There was also greater esophagus and spinal cord sparing. The overall survival rate was 100% at 1.5 years of median follow-up (0.5-4.9), and all patients were free of disease. For toxicity, all patients had some form of acute side effects: 66% experienced grade 2 breast/chest pain or soreness; 100% had grade 2 radiation dermatitis or skin induration; 33% had grade 2 fatigue; and 17% had grade 2 esophagitis (per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] version 5.0; US National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland). Subacute toxicity (within 6 months) was observed for 17% of patients with delayed onset of grade 3 dermatitis in the setting of preexisting lupus, 17% with a delayed surgical wound complication, and 17% with grade 2 soft tissue fibrosis. No grade 4 or 5 events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial dose reductions to multiple organs at risk while maintaining target coverage make proton the preferred modality for bilateral breast cancer treatment when available. The Particle Therapy Co-operative Group 2023-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10166012/ /pubmed/37169011 http://dx.doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-22-00041.1 Text en ©Copyright 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) ).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Brooks, Eric D.
Mailhot Vega, Raymond B.
Vivers, Emma
Burchianti, Teena
Liang, Xiaoying
Spiguel, Lisa R.
Jasra, Bharti
Mendenhall, Nancy P.
Oladeru, Oluwadamilola T.
Bradley, Julie A.
Proton Therapy for Bilateral Breast Cancer Maximizes Normal-Tissue Sparing
title Proton Therapy for Bilateral Breast Cancer Maximizes Normal-Tissue Sparing
title_full Proton Therapy for Bilateral Breast Cancer Maximizes Normal-Tissue Sparing
title_fullStr Proton Therapy for Bilateral Breast Cancer Maximizes Normal-Tissue Sparing
title_full_unstemmed Proton Therapy for Bilateral Breast Cancer Maximizes Normal-Tissue Sparing
title_short Proton Therapy for Bilateral Breast Cancer Maximizes Normal-Tissue Sparing
title_sort proton therapy for bilateral breast cancer maximizes normal-tissue sparing
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37169011
http://dx.doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-22-00041.1
work_keys_str_mv AT brooksericd protontherapyforbilateralbreastcancermaximizesnormaltissuesparing
AT mailhotvegaraymondb protontherapyforbilateralbreastcancermaximizesnormaltissuesparing
AT viversemma protontherapyforbilateralbreastcancermaximizesnormaltissuesparing
AT burchiantiteena protontherapyforbilateralbreastcancermaximizesnormaltissuesparing
AT liangxiaoying protontherapyforbilateralbreastcancermaximizesnormaltissuesparing
AT spiguellisar protontherapyforbilateralbreastcancermaximizesnormaltissuesparing
AT jasrabharti protontherapyforbilateralbreastcancermaximizesnormaltissuesparing
AT mendenhallnancyp protontherapyforbilateralbreastcancermaximizesnormaltissuesparing
AT oladeruoluwadamilolat protontherapyforbilateralbreastcancermaximizesnormaltissuesparing
AT bradleyjuliea protontherapyforbilateralbreastcancermaximizesnormaltissuesparing