Cargando…
Retrospective study of influencing factors on the outcomes of luteal phase stimulation in patients with dual stimulation
BACKGROUND: Dual/double stimulation (DS) is an ovarian stimulation strategy that has emerged in recent years; it is characterized by two rounds of ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval in the same menstrual cycle. DS can greatly shorten the time required to obtain valid embryos in assisted reprod...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37168538 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15296 |
_version_ | 1785038370530918400 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Yuanyuan Ye, Hong Bao, Junhua Cai, Yanping Hu, Yuanbo Yan, Hongli |
author_facet | Chen, Yuanyuan Ye, Hong Bao, Junhua Cai, Yanping Hu, Yuanbo Yan, Hongli |
author_sort | Chen, Yuanyuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dual/double stimulation (DS) is an ovarian stimulation strategy that has emerged in recent years; it is characterized by two rounds of ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval in the same menstrual cycle. DS can greatly shorten the time required to obtain valid embryos in assisted reproduction. For fertility preservation, DS can speed up oocyte storage process. However, factors influencing luteal phase ovarian stimulation (LPS) outcomes in DS have not been elucidated. METHODS: A total of 156 cycles from 78 cases were studied. Patients were grouped and analyzed according to their follicular phase ovarian stimulation (FPS) types. Female ages, ovarian stimulation protocols, number of oocytes retrieved, embryo quality were recorded. Comparisons of outcomes were conducted between different groups. RESULTS: Our study found that LPS obtained similar outcomes to follicular phase stimulation (FPS), and that the choice of FPS protocol affected the efficiency of LPS, the antagonist protocol and progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol resulted in better embryo outcomes in LPS. In LPS of DS, sufficient stimulation duration was the guarantee of embryo quality (number of available embryos: β = 0.145, 95% CI [0.078–0.211], P = 0.000; number of high-quality embryos: β = 0.114, 95% CI [0.057–0.171], P = 0.000). DISCUSSION: This study provided ideas for the precise use of DS. We suggest to further expand the sample size of DS in the future, conduct prospective controlled studies, unify the sample size of each subgroup, include the ovarian reserve of patients in the grouping basis, and exclude the influence of male factors. We hope that this study will help further refinement of DS so as to maximize patient benefits from it. CONCLUSION: When the DS strategy is considered in the follicular phase, the antagonist protocol and PPOS protocol are more recommended for better embryo outcomes in LPS. During LPS, adequate ovarian stimulation duration is the most important guarantee for LPS efficiency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10166075 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101660752023-05-09 Retrospective study of influencing factors on the outcomes of luteal phase stimulation in patients with dual stimulation Chen, Yuanyuan Ye, Hong Bao, Junhua Cai, Yanping Hu, Yuanbo Yan, Hongli PeerJ Gynecology and Obstetrics BACKGROUND: Dual/double stimulation (DS) is an ovarian stimulation strategy that has emerged in recent years; it is characterized by two rounds of ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval in the same menstrual cycle. DS can greatly shorten the time required to obtain valid embryos in assisted reproduction. For fertility preservation, DS can speed up oocyte storage process. However, factors influencing luteal phase ovarian stimulation (LPS) outcomes in DS have not been elucidated. METHODS: A total of 156 cycles from 78 cases were studied. Patients were grouped and analyzed according to their follicular phase ovarian stimulation (FPS) types. Female ages, ovarian stimulation protocols, number of oocytes retrieved, embryo quality were recorded. Comparisons of outcomes were conducted between different groups. RESULTS: Our study found that LPS obtained similar outcomes to follicular phase stimulation (FPS), and that the choice of FPS protocol affected the efficiency of LPS, the antagonist protocol and progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol resulted in better embryo outcomes in LPS. In LPS of DS, sufficient stimulation duration was the guarantee of embryo quality (number of available embryos: β = 0.145, 95% CI [0.078–0.211], P = 0.000; number of high-quality embryos: β = 0.114, 95% CI [0.057–0.171], P = 0.000). DISCUSSION: This study provided ideas for the precise use of DS. We suggest to further expand the sample size of DS in the future, conduct prospective controlled studies, unify the sample size of each subgroup, include the ovarian reserve of patients in the grouping basis, and exclude the influence of male factors. We hope that this study will help further refinement of DS so as to maximize patient benefits from it. CONCLUSION: When the DS strategy is considered in the follicular phase, the antagonist protocol and PPOS protocol are more recommended for better embryo outcomes in LPS. During LPS, adequate ovarian stimulation duration is the most important guarantee for LPS efficiency. PeerJ Inc. 2023-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10166075/ /pubmed/37168538 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15296 Text en © 2023 Chen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Gynecology and Obstetrics Chen, Yuanyuan Ye, Hong Bao, Junhua Cai, Yanping Hu, Yuanbo Yan, Hongli Retrospective study of influencing factors on the outcomes of luteal phase stimulation in patients with dual stimulation |
title | Retrospective study of influencing factors on the outcomes of luteal phase stimulation in patients with dual stimulation |
title_full | Retrospective study of influencing factors on the outcomes of luteal phase stimulation in patients with dual stimulation |
title_fullStr | Retrospective study of influencing factors on the outcomes of luteal phase stimulation in patients with dual stimulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Retrospective study of influencing factors on the outcomes of luteal phase stimulation in patients with dual stimulation |
title_short | Retrospective study of influencing factors on the outcomes of luteal phase stimulation in patients with dual stimulation |
title_sort | retrospective study of influencing factors on the outcomes of luteal phase stimulation in patients with dual stimulation |
topic | Gynecology and Obstetrics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37168538 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15296 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenyuanyuan retrospectivestudyofinfluencingfactorsontheoutcomesoflutealphasestimulationinpatientswithdualstimulation AT yehong retrospectivestudyofinfluencingfactorsontheoutcomesoflutealphasestimulationinpatientswithdualstimulation AT baojunhua retrospectivestudyofinfluencingfactorsontheoutcomesoflutealphasestimulationinpatientswithdualstimulation AT caiyanping retrospectivestudyofinfluencingfactorsontheoutcomesoflutealphasestimulationinpatientswithdualstimulation AT huyuanbo retrospectivestudyofinfluencingfactorsontheoutcomesoflutealphasestimulationinpatientswithdualstimulation AT yanhongli retrospectivestudyofinfluencingfactorsontheoutcomesoflutealphasestimulationinpatientswithdualstimulation |