Cargando…

Retrospective study of influencing factors on the outcomes of luteal phase stimulation in patients with dual stimulation

BACKGROUND: Dual/double stimulation (DS) is an ovarian stimulation strategy that has emerged in recent years; it is characterized by two rounds of ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval in the same menstrual cycle. DS can greatly shorten the time required to obtain valid embryos in assisted reprod...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yuanyuan, Ye, Hong, Bao, Junhua, Cai, Yanping, Hu, Yuanbo, Yan, Hongli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37168538
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15296
_version_ 1785038370530918400
author Chen, Yuanyuan
Ye, Hong
Bao, Junhua
Cai, Yanping
Hu, Yuanbo
Yan, Hongli
author_facet Chen, Yuanyuan
Ye, Hong
Bao, Junhua
Cai, Yanping
Hu, Yuanbo
Yan, Hongli
author_sort Chen, Yuanyuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dual/double stimulation (DS) is an ovarian stimulation strategy that has emerged in recent years; it is characterized by two rounds of ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval in the same menstrual cycle. DS can greatly shorten the time required to obtain valid embryos in assisted reproduction. For fertility preservation, DS can speed up oocyte storage process. However, factors influencing luteal phase ovarian stimulation (LPS) outcomes in DS have not been elucidated. METHODS: A total of 156 cycles from 78 cases were studied. Patients were grouped and analyzed according to their follicular phase ovarian stimulation (FPS) types. Female ages, ovarian stimulation protocols, number of oocytes retrieved, embryo quality were recorded. Comparisons of outcomes were conducted between different groups. RESULTS: Our study found that LPS obtained similar outcomes to follicular phase stimulation (FPS), and that the choice of FPS protocol affected the efficiency of LPS, the antagonist protocol and progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol resulted in better embryo outcomes in LPS. In LPS of DS, sufficient stimulation duration was the guarantee of embryo quality (number of available embryos: β = 0.145, 95% CI [0.078–0.211], P = 0.000; number of high-quality embryos: β = 0.114, 95% CI [0.057–0.171], P = 0.000). DISCUSSION: This study provided ideas for the precise use of DS. We suggest to further expand the sample size of DS in the future, conduct prospective controlled studies, unify the sample size of each subgroup, include the ovarian reserve of patients in the grouping basis, and exclude the influence of male factors. We hope that this study will help further refinement of DS so as to maximize patient benefits from it. CONCLUSION: When the DS strategy is considered in the follicular phase, the antagonist protocol and PPOS protocol are more recommended for better embryo outcomes in LPS. During LPS, adequate ovarian stimulation duration is the most important guarantee for LPS efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10166075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101660752023-05-09 Retrospective study of influencing factors on the outcomes of luteal phase stimulation in patients with dual stimulation Chen, Yuanyuan Ye, Hong Bao, Junhua Cai, Yanping Hu, Yuanbo Yan, Hongli PeerJ Gynecology and Obstetrics BACKGROUND: Dual/double stimulation (DS) is an ovarian stimulation strategy that has emerged in recent years; it is characterized by two rounds of ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval in the same menstrual cycle. DS can greatly shorten the time required to obtain valid embryos in assisted reproduction. For fertility preservation, DS can speed up oocyte storage process. However, factors influencing luteal phase ovarian stimulation (LPS) outcomes in DS have not been elucidated. METHODS: A total of 156 cycles from 78 cases were studied. Patients were grouped and analyzed according to their follicular phase ovarian stimulation (FPS) types. Female ages, ovarian stimulation protocols, number of oocytes retrieved, embryo quality were recorded. Comparisons of outcomes were conducted between different groups. RESULTS: Our study found that LPS obtained similar outcomes to follicular phase stimulation (FPS), and that the choice of FPS protocol affected the efficiency of LPS, the antagonist protocol and progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol resulted in better embryo outcomes in LPS. In LPS of DS, sufficient stimulation duration was the guarantee of embryo quality (number of available embryos: β = 0.145, 95% CI [0.078–0.211], P = 0.000; number of high-quality embryos: β = 0.114, 95% CI [0.057–0.171], P = 0.000). DISCUSSION: This study provided ideas for the precise use of DS. We suggest to further expand the sample size of DS in the future, conduct prospective controlled studies, unify the sample size of each subgroup, include the ovarian reserve of patients in the grouping basis, and exclude the influence of male factors. We hope that this study will help further refinement of DS so as to maximize patient benefits from it. CONCLUSION: When the DS strategy is considered in the follicular phase, the antagonist protocol and PPOS protocol are more recommended for better embryo outcomes in LPS. During LPS, adequate ovarian stimulation duration is the most important guarantee for LPS efficiency. PeerJ Inc. 2023-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10166075/ /pubmed/37168538 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15296 Text en © 2023 Chen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Gynecology and Obstetrics
Chen, Yuanyuan
Ye, Hong
Bao, Junhua
Cai, Yanping
Hu, Yuanbo
Yan, Hongli
Retrospective study of influencing factors on the outcomes of luteal phase stimulation in patients with dual stimulation
title Retrospective study of influencing factors on the outcomes of luteal phase stimulation in patients with dual stimulation
title_full Retrospective study of influencing factors on the outcomes of luteal phase stimulation in patients with dual stimulation
title_fullStr Retrospective study of influencing factors on the outcomes of luteal phase stimulation in patients with dual stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective study of influencing factors on the outcomes of luteal phase stimulation in patients with dual stimulation
title_short Retrospective study of influencing factors on the outcomes of luteal phase stimulation in patients with dual stimulation
title_sort retrospective study of influencing factors on the outcomes of luteal phase stimulation in patients with dual stimulation
topic Gynecology and Obstetrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37168538
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15296
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyuanyuan retrospectivestudyofinfluencingfactorsontheoutcomesoflutealphasestimulationinpatientswithdualstimulation
AT yehong retrospectivestudyofinfluencingfactorsontheoutcomesoflutealphasestimulationinpatientswithdualstimulation
AT baojunhua retrospectivestudyofinfluencingfactorsontheoutcomesoflutealphasestimulationinpatientswithdualstimulation
AT caiyanping retrospectivestudyofinfluencingfactorsontheoutcomesoflutealphasestimulationinpatientswithdualstimulation
AT huyuanbo retrospectivestudyofinfluencingfactorsontheoutcomesoflutealphasestimulationinpatientswithdualstimulation
AT yanhongli retrospectivestudyofinfluencingfactorsontheoutcomesoflutealphasestimulationinpatientswithdualstimulation