Cargando…

Geriatric Radiation Oncology: What We Know and What Can We Do Better?

Elderly patients represent a growing subgroup of cancer patients for whom the role of radiation therapy is poorly defined. Older patients are still clearly underrepresented in clinical trials, resulting in very limited high-level evidence. Moreover, elderly patients are less likely to receive radiat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roeder, Falk, Jensen, Alexandra D, Lindel, Katja, Mattke, Matthias, Wolf, Frank, Gerum, Sabine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37168037
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S365495
_version_ 1785038375192887296
author Roeder, Falk
Jensen, Alexandra D
Lindel, Katja
Mattke, Matthias
Wolf, Frank
Gerum, Sabine
author_facet Roeder, Falk
Jensen, Alexandra D
Lindel, Katja
Mattke, Matthias
Wolf, Frank
Gerum, Sabine
author_sort Roeder, Falk
collection PubMed
description Elderly patients represent a growing subgroup of cancer patients for whom the role of radiation therapy is poorly defined. Older patients are still clearly underrepresented in clinical trials, resulting in very limited high-level evidence. Moreover, elderly patients are less likely to receive radiation therapy in similar clinical scenarios compared to younger patients. However, there is no clear evidence for a generally reduced radiation tolerance with increasing age. Modern radiation techniques have clearly reduced acute and late side effects, thus extending the boundaries of the possible regarding treatment intensity in elderly or frail patients. Hypofractionated regimens have further decreased the socioeconomic burden of radiation treatments by reducing the overall treatment time. The current review aims at summarizing the existing data for the use of radiation therapy or chemoradiation in elderly patients focusing on the main cancer types. It provides an overview of treatment tolerability and outcomes with current standard radiation therapy regimens, including possible predictive factors in the elderly population. Strategies for patient selection for standard or tailored radiation therapy approaches based on age, performance score or comorbidity, including the use of prediction tests or geriatric assessments, are discussed. Current and future possibilities for improvements of routine care and creation of high-level evidence in elderly patients receiving radiation therapy are highlighted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10166100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101661002023-05-09 Geriatric Radiation Oncology: What We Know and What Can We Do Better? Roeder, Falk Jensen, Alexandra D Lindel, Katja Mattke, Matthias Wolf, Frank Gerum, Sabine Clin Interv Aging Review Elderly patients represent a growing subgroup of cancer patients for whom the role of radiation therapy is poorly defined. Older patients are still clearly underrepresented in clinical trials, resulting in very limited high-level evidence. Moreover, elderly patients are less likely to receive radiation therapy in similar clinical scenarios compared to younger patients. However, there is no clear evidence for a generally reduced radiation tolerance with increasing age. Modern radiation techniques have clearly reduced acute and late side effects, thus extending the boundaries of the possible regarding treatment intensity in elderly or frail patients. Hypofractionated regimens have further decreased the socioeconomic burden of radiation treatments by reducing the overall treatment time. The current review aims at summarizing the existing data for the use of radiation therapy or chemoradiation in elderly patients focusing on the main cancer types. It provides an overview of treatment tolerability and outcomes with current standard radiation therapy regimens, including possible predictive factors in the elderly population. Strategies for patient selection for standard or tailored radiation therapy approaches based on age, performance score or comorbidity, including the use of prediction tests or geriatric assessments, are discussed. Current and future possibilities for improvements of routine care and creation of high-level evidence in elderly patients receiving radiation therapy are highlighted. Dove 2023-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10166100/ /pubmed/37168037 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S365495 Text en © 2023 Roeder et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Roeder, Falk
Jensen, Alexandra D
Lindel, Katja
Mattke, Matthias
Wolf, Frank
Gerum, Sabine
Geriatric Radiation Oncology: What We Know and What Can We Do Better?
title Geriatric Radiation Oncology: What We Know and What Can We Do Better?
title_full Geriatric Radiation Oncology: What We Know and What Can We Do Better?
title_fullStr Geriatric Radiation Oncology: What We Know and What Can We Do Better?
title_full_unstemmed Geriatric Radiation Oncology: What We Know and What Can We Do Better?
title_short Geriatric Radiation Oncology: What We Know and What Can We Do Better?
title_sort geriatric radiation oncology: what we know and what can we do better?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37168037
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S365495
work_keys_str_mv AT roederfalk geriatricradiationoncologywhatweknowandwhatcanwedobetter
AT jensenalexandrad geriatricradiationoncologywhatweknowandwhatcanwedobetter
AT lindelkatja geriatricradiationoncologywhatweknowandwhatcanwedobetter
AT mattkematthias geriatricradiationoncologywhatweknowandwhatcanwedobetter
AT wolffrank geriatricradiationoncologywhatweknowandwhatcanwedobetter
AT gerumsabine geriatricradiationoncologywhatweknowandwhatcanwedobetter