Cargando…
Geriatric Radiation Oncology: What We Know and What Can We Do Better?
Elderly patients represent a growing subgroup of cancer patients for whom the role of radiation therapy is poorly defined. Older patients are still clearly underrepresented in clinical trials, resulting in very limited high-level evidence. Moreover, elderly patients are less likely to receive radiat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37168037 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S365495 |
_version_ | 1785038375192887296 |
---|---|
author | Roeder, Falk Jensen, Alexandra D Lindel, Katja Mattke, Matthias Wolf, Frank Gerum, Sabine |
author_facet | Roeder, Falk Jensen, Alexandra D Lindel, Katja Mattke, Matthias Wolf, Frank Gerum, Sabine |
author_sort | Roeder, Falk |
collection | PubMed |
description | Elderly patients represent a growing subgroup of cancer patients for whom the role of radiation therapy is poorly defined. Older patients are still clearly underrepresented in clinical trials, resulting in very limited high-level evidence. Moreover, elderly patients are less likely to receive radiation therapy in similar clinical scenarios compared to younger patients. However, there is no clear evidence for a generally reduced radiation tolerance with increasing age. Modern radiation techniques have clearly reduced acute and late side effects, thus extending the boundaries of the possible regarding treatment intensity in elderly or frail patients. Hypofractionated regimens have further decreased the socioeconomic burden of radiation treatments by reducing the overall treatment time. The current review aims at summarizing the existing data for the use of radiation therapy or chemoradiation in elderly patients focusing on the main cancer types. It provides an overview of treatment tolerability and outcomes with current standard radiation therapy regimens, including possible predictive factors in the elderly population. Strategies for patient selection for standard or tailored radiation therapy approaches based on age, performance score or comorbidity, including the use of prediction tests or geriatric assessments, are discussed. Current and future possibilities for improvements of routine care and creation of high-level evidence in elderly patients receiving radiation therapy are highlighted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10166100 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101661002023-05-09 Geriatric Radiation Oncology: What We Know and What Can We Do Better? Roeder, Falk Jensen, Alexandra D Lindel, Katja Mattke, Matthias Wolf, Frank Gerum, Sabine Clin Interv Aging Review Elderly patients represent a growing subgroup of cancer patients for whom the role of radiation therapy is poorly defined. Older patients are still clearly underrepresented in clinical trials, resulting in very limited high-level evidence. Moreover, elderly patients are less likely to receive radiation therapy in similar clinical scenarios compared to younger patients. However, there is no clear evidence for a generally reduced radiation tolerance with increasing age. Modern radiation techniques have clearly reduced acute and late side effects, thus extending the boundaries of the possible regarding treatment intensity in elderly or frail patients. Hypofractionated regimens have further decreased the socioeconomic burden of radiation treatments by reducing the overall treatment time. The current review aims at summarizing the existing data for the use of radiation therapy or chemoradiation in elderly patients focusing on the main cancer types. It provides an overview of treatment tolerability and outcomes with current standard radiation therapy regimens, including possible predictive factors in the elderly population. Strategies for patient selection for standard or tailored radiation therapy approaches based on age, performance score or comorbidity, including the use of prediction tests or geriatric assessments, are discussed. Current and future possibilities for improvements of routine care and creation of high-level evidence in elderly patients receiving radiation therapy are highlighted. Dove 2023-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10166100/ /pubmed/37168037 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S365495 Text en © 2023 Roeder et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Review Roeder, Falk Jensen, Alexandra D Lindel, Katja Mattke, Matthias Wolf, Frank Gerum, Sabine Geriatric Radiation Oncology: What We Know and What Can We Do Better? |
title | Geriatric Radiation Oncology: What We Know and What Can We Do Better? |
title_full | Geriatric Radiation Oncology: What We Know and What Can We Do Better? |
title_fullStr | Geriatric Radiation Oncology: What We Know and What Can We Do Better? |
title_full_unstemmed | Geriatric Radiation Oncology: What We Know and What Can We Do Better? |
title_short | Geriatric Radiation Oncology: What We Know and What Can We Do Better? |
title_sort | geriatric radiation oncology: what we know and what can we do better? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37168037 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S365495 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roederfalk geriatricradiationoncologywhatweknowandwhatcanwedobetter AT jensenalexandrad geriatricradiationoncologywhatweknowandwhatcanwedobetter AT lindelkatja geriatricradiationoncologywhatweknowandwhatcanwedobetter AT mattkematthias geriatricradiationoncologywhatweknowandwhatcanwedobetter AT wolffrank geriatricradiationoncologywhatweknowandwhatcanwedobetter AT gerumsabine geriatricradiationoncologywhatweknowandwhatcanwedobetter |