Cargando…
Can multidetector CT replace MRI for evaluating mesorectal fascia in rectal cancer?
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing mesorectal fascia (MRF) in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS: This resear...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
China Medical University
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37168724 http://dx.doi.org/10.37796/2211-8039.1311 |
_version_ | 1785038406192988160 |
---|---|
author | Farghdani, Maryam Karami, Mehdi Najmabadi, Amirafraz Fallah |
author_facet | Farghdani, Maryam Karami, Mehdi Najmabadi, Amirafraz Fallah |
author_sort | Farghdani, Maryam |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing mesorectal fascia (MRF) in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS: This research was a cross-sectional study of 60 patients with rectal cancer referred to two centers in Isfahan, Al-Zahra, and Seyed-al-Shohada hospitals. Considered parameters included sex, tumoral location, nodal involvement, as well as tumoral description. To assess the invasion of MRF in rectal cancer, researchers used MRI, axial MDCT, and multiplanar reconstruction CT scan (MPRCT). Sensitivity, specificity, and techniques’ positive and negative predictive values were measured. Also, to assess the statistical associations, the Kappa coefficient was used. RESULTS: There was no significant association between axial MDCT and MRI reports regarding MRF involvement (P>0.05). However, a statistical association was determined between the reports of multiplanar reconstruction CT (MPRCT) and MRI (P< 0.01, kappa=0.44). In addition, the association between MPRCT and MRI reports was statistically significant in patients with wall thickening and negative nodal involvement (Kappa = 0.699, P = 0.001). On the other hand, there was more agreement between MPRCT and MRI reports in patients with tumors in the middle or upper rectum. CONCLUSION: The association between MRI and MPRCT reports regarding MRF involvement was statistically significant in patients with wall thickening and negative nodal involvement in the upper and middle rectum. Consequently, it is possible to replace MRI with the MPRCT method for assessing MRF in some patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10166253 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | China Medical University |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101662532023-05-09 Can multidetector CT replace MRI for evaluating mesorectal fascia in rectal cancer? Farghdani, Maryam Karami, Mehdi Najmabadi, Amirafraz Fallah Biomedicine (Taipei) Original Article BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing mesorectal fascia (MRF) in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS: This research was a cross-sectional study of 60 patients with rectal cancer referred to two centers in Isfahan, Al-Zahra, and Seyed-al-Shohada hospitals. Considered parameters included sex, tumoral location, nodal involvement, as well as tumoral description. To assess the invasion of MRF in rectal cancer, researchers used MRI, axial MDCT, and multiplanar reconstruction CT scan (MPRCT). Sensitivity, specificity, and techniques’ positive and negative predictive values were measured. Also, to assess the statistical associations, the Kappa coefficient was used. RESULTS: There was no significant association between axial MDCT and MRI reports regarding MRF involvement (P>0.05). However, a statistical association was determined between the reports of multiplanar reconstruction CT (MPRCT) and MRI (P< 0.01, kappa=0.44). In addition, the association between MPRCT and MRI reports was statistically significant in patients with wall thickening and negative nodal involvement (Kappa = 0.699, P = 0.001). On the other hand, there was more agreement between MPRCT and MRI reports in patients with tumors in the middle or upper rectum. CONCLUSION: The association between MRI and MPRCT reports regarding MRF involvement was statistically significant in patients with wall thickening and negative nodal involvement in the upper and middle rectum. Consequently, it is possible to replace MRI with the MPRCT method for assessing MRF in some patients. China Medical University 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10166253/ /pubmed/37168724 http://dx.doi.org/10.37796/2211-8039.1311 Text en © the Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Farghdani, Maryam Karami, Mehdi Najmabadi, Amirafraz Fallah Can multidetector CT replace MRI for evaluating mesorectal fascia in rectal cancer? |
title | Can multidetector CT replace MRI for evaluating mesorectal fascia in rectal cancer? |
title_full | Can multidetector CT replace MRI for evaluating mesorectal fascia in rectal cancer? |
title_fullStr | Can multidetector CT replace MRI for evaluating mesorectal fascia in rectal cancer? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can multidetector CT replace MRI for evaluating mesorectal fascia in rectal cancer? |
title_short | Can multidetector CT replace MRI for evaluating mesorectal fascia in rectal cancer? |
title_sort | can multidetector ct replace mri for evaluating mesorectal fascia in rectal cancer? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37168724 http://dx.doi.org/10.37796/2211-8039.1311 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT farghdanimaryam canmultidetectorctreplacemriforevaluatingmesorectalfasciainrectalcancer AT karamimehdi canmultidetectorctreplacemriforevaluatingmesorectalfasciainrectalcancer AT najmabadiamirafrazfallah canmultidetectorctreplacemriforevaluatingmesorectalfasciainrectalcancer |