Cargando…

Can multidetector CT replace MRI for evaluating mesorectal fascia in rectal cancer?

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing mesorectal fascia (MRF) in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS: This resear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farghdani, Maryam, Karami, Mehdi, Najmabadi, Amirafraz Fallah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: China Medical University 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37168724
http://dx.doi.org/10.37796/2211-8039.1311
_version_ 1785038406192988160
author Farghdani, Maryam
Karami, Mehdi
Najmabadi, Amirafraz Fallah
author_facet Farghdani, Maryam
Karami, Mehdi
Najmabadi, Amirafraz Fallah
author_sort Farghdani, Maryam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing mesorectal fascia (MRF) in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS: This research was a cross-sectional study of 60 patients with rectal cancer referred to two centers in Isfahan, Al-Zahra, and Seyed-al-Shohada hospitals. Considered parameters included sex, tumoral location, nodal involvement, as well as tumoral description. To assess the invasion of MRF in rectal cancer, researchers used MRI, axial MDCT, and multiplanar reconstruction CT scan (MPRCT). Sensitivity, specificity, and techniques’ positive and negative predictive values were measured. Also, to assess the statistical associations, the Kappa coefficient was used. RESULTS: There was no significant association between axial MDCT and MRI reports regarding MRF involvement (P>0.05). However, a statistical association was determined between the reports of multiplanar reconstruction CT (MPRCT) and MRI (P< 0.01, kappa=0.44). In addition, the association between MPRCT and MRI reports was statistically significant in patients with wall thickening and negative nodal involvement (Kappa = 0.699, P = 0.001). On the other hand, there was more agreement between MPRCT and MRI reports in patients with tumors in the middle or upper rectum. CONCLUSION: The association between MRI and MPRCT reports regarding MRF involvement was statistically significant in patients with wall thickening and negative nodal involvement in the upper and middle rectum. Consequently, it is possible to replace MRI with the MPRCT method for assessing MRF in some patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10166253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher China Medical University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101662532023-05-09 Can multidetector CT replace MRI for evaluating mesorectal fascia in rectal cancer? Farghdani, Maryam Karami, Mehdi Najmabadi, Amirafraz Fallah Biomedicine (Taipei) Original Article BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing mesorectal fascia (MRF) in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS: This research was a cross-sectional study of 60 patients with rectal cancer referred to two centers in Isfahan, Al-Zahra, and Seyed-al-Shohada hospitals. Considered parameters included sex, tumoral location, nodal involvement, as well as tumoral description. To assess the invasion of MRF in rectal cancer, researchers used MRI, axial MDCT, and multiplanar reconstruction CT scan (MPRCT). Sensitivity, specificity, and techniques’ positive and negative predictive values were measured. Also, to assess the statistical associations, the Kappa coefficient was used. RESULTS: There was no significant association between axial MDCT and MRI reports regarding MRF involvement (P>0.05). However, a statistical association was determined between the reports of multiplanar reconstruction CT (MPRCT) and MRI (P< 0.01, kappa=0.44). In addition, the association between MPRCT and MRI reports was statistically significant in patients with wall thickening and negative nodal involvement (Kappa = 0.699, P = 0.001). On the other hand, there was more agreement between MPRCT and MRI reports in patients with tumors in the middle or upper rectum. CONCLUSION: The association between MRI and MPRCT reports regarding MRF involvement was statistically significant in patients with wall thickening and negative nodal involvement in the upper and middle rectum. Consequently, it is possible to replace MRI with the MPRCT method for assessing MRF in some patients. China Medical University 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10166253/ /pubmed/37168724 http://dx.doi.org/10.37796/2211-8039.1311 Text en © the Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Original Article
Farghdani, Maryam
Karami, Mehdi
Najmabadi, Amirafraz Fallah
Can multidetector CT replace MRI for evaluating mesorectal fascia in rectal cancer?
title Can multidetector CT replace MRI for evaluating mesorectal fascia in rectal cancer?
title_full Can multidetector CT replace MRI for evaluating mesorectal fascia in rectal cancer?
title_fullStr Can multidetector CT replace MRI for evaluating mesorectal fascia in rectal cancer?
title_full_unstemmed Can multidetector CT replace MRI for evaluating mesorectal fascia in rectal cancer?
title_short Can multidetector CT replace MRI for evaluating mesorectal fascia in rectal cancer?
title_sort can multidetector ct replace mri for evaluating mesorectal fascia in rectal cancer?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37168724
http://dx.doi.org/10.37796/2211-8039.1311
work_keys_str_mv AT farghdanimaryam canmultidetectorctreplacemriforevaluatingmesorectalfasciainrectalcancer
AT karamimehdi canmultidetectorctreplacemriforevaluatingmesorectalfasciainrectalcancer
AT najmabadiamirafrazfallah canmultidetectorctreplacemriforevaluatingmesorectalfasciainrectalcancer